Back


Newsgroup sci.math 156713

Directory

Subject: Re: Why can't 1/0 be defined??? -- From: vistoli@math.harvard.edu (Angelo Vistoli)
Subject: Re: Ugly Mathematics? -- From: John Votaw
Subject: Re: Does Apple (Apple) = Apple? -- From: davk@netcom.com (David Kaufman)
Subject: Re: Mathematica, Maple, Mathcad and similar -- From: "Antoine Mathys"
Subject: Re: ZEROS of the 2500th degree polinomials -- From: tleko@aol.com
Subject: Re: fermat -- From: "Antoine Mathys"
Subject: Re: x^y+y^x>=1 -- From: b841039@math.ntu.edu.tw (sfly)
Subject: Re: PROBLEMS !!! -- From: ags@seaman.cc.purdue.edu (Dave Seaman)
Subject: recurring sequence 1,3,6,1,6,3,1,9,9 -- From: jrupe@advtech.uswest.com (Jason Rupe)
Subject: Re: x^y+y^x>=1 -- From: hrubin@b.stat.purdue.edu (Herman Rubin)
Subject: Re: x^y+y^x>=1 -- From: tony@jobstream.co.uk (Tony Lezard)
Subject: Re: The Inferiority of Cydonian "Math" in Comparison to the Earthly Science-Art -- From: caj@sherlock.math.niu.edu (Xcott Craver)
Subject: Re: circle algorithm -- From: Rick Decker
Subject: Re: PROBLEMS !!! -- From: Jacob
Subject: Detailed Contents for Godel, Escher, Bach -- From: cybermonk@cybtrans.com (Cybermonk)
Subject: Re: Fourier transform of non-linearities... -- From: Simon Read
Subject: Re: 4 lines / Wlod-1996 -- From: Simon Read
Subject: Re: Angle trisection -- From: bp887@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Angel Garcia)
Subject: Re: The Inferiority of Cydonian "Math" in Comparison to the Earthly Science-Art -- From: Jiri Mruzek
Subject: Re: The Inferiority of Cydonian "Math" in Comparison to the Earthly Science-Art -- From: Jiri Mruzek
Subject: algebra problem -- From: Wieschebrink@t-online.de (Christian Wieschebrink)
Subject: Re: x^y+y^x>=1 -- From: Richard Mentock
Subject: Re: prime number problem -- From: haha@astral.magic.ca (Hans Havermann)
Subject: Re: Math tricks/jokes? - math.jok (1/1) -- From: HdeJonge@ravelin.nl (Herre de Jonge)

Articles

Subject: Re: Why can't 1/0 be defined???
From: vistoli@math.harvard.edu (Angelo Vistoli)
Date: 3 Jan 1997 14:19:26 GMT
There two ways to compactify the real line, and both are useful in
different circumstances: one is to add +oo and -oo, obtaining a closed
segment, and the other one is to add only one point oo, obtaining a
circle. In this second case it makes perfect sense to say that the limit
of 1/x as x goes to 0 is oo.
Angelo Vistoli
-- 
Angelo Vistoli
Dipartimento di Matematica         Department of Mathematics
Universita` di Bologna             Science Center
Piazza di Porta San Donato 5       Harvard University
40127 Bologna                      Cambridge, MA 02174
Italy                              U.S.A.
Return to Top
Subject: Re: Ugly Mathematics?
From: John Votaw
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 1997 09:37:05 -0500
Three proofs have been given to show that 
"[a] natural number is a multiple of 3 iff 
the sum of the digits in its decimal
representation is a multiple of 3."  
Which is the most elegant?
I submit that the elegance of a proof cannot
be determined independent of the intended reader.
What good is a simple proof if no one
or only a few can understand it?  Certainly, 
the proof that recognizes the ring-
homomorphism is more elegent to someone familiar
with rings but is meaningless to the calculus
student who has not yet studied rings.
IMHO, the most elegent proof is the briefest
proof that can immediately be understood by
the intended reader.  In this perspective,
the concepts that make for good writting
or public speaking apply to mathamatical
proofs as well.
Personally, I was immediately convinced of
the truth of the theorm after reading the
van Gasteren presentation.  It took me 
several minutes of thinking about the 
summation in the proof presented by
Dan Kotlow before I realized what was
obvious to him.  The proof presented by
Ulrich Lange is meaningless to me because
I don't know what a ring-homomorphism is.
So, for me there is no question about
which proof is more elegant -- van Gasteren.
I think some of the comments in the "how
to study math" thread are applicable here.
As I learn more about mathamatics, what I
once thought was elegant will fade into
heavy-handedness and be replaced
by ideas and concepts that give me a deeper
understanding.
Return to Top
Subject: Re: Does Apple (Apple) = Apple?
From: davk@netcom.com (David Kaufman)
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 1997 09:20:06 GMT
For purpose of clarity in presentation, I added the square terms.
        1 atom   1 atoms        atoms
        ------   -------  =  ----------
        [d] m    [d] m        [dd] m^2
 Comment: Note that atoms (atoms) = atoms
Note that all constant rates (with numbered words) = 1
Therefore, the previous omission of (atom/[d]m) was dimentionally correct
but not clear or useful.
	The essense of the post is below, with the challenge still
unanswered. Anyone up to it?
David Kaufman (davk@netcom.com) wrote:
Regarding: apples (apples) = apples
: 	However, I would never solve problems this way except 
: as follows:
: Given:  distance d = [d] meters/atom in a square layer
:              |  d  |
:              |<--->|
:     |-->  O     O     O      <---3 atoms in a row
:     | d 
:     |  
:     |-->  O     O     O
: û
: Find:  The number of atoms in a meter square (m^2)
: Solution: The quick solution is by squaring the inverse of d
:           as follows:
:        1 atom   1 atoms        atoms
:        ------   -------  =  ----------
:        [d] m    [d] m        [dd] m^2
: Comment: Note that atoms (atoms) = atoms
: 	It seems that squaring an item (not a unit of 
: measurement) equals the item.  What do you think?
: 	It works for atoms and is used in chemistry to solve an
: important problem of how many atoms per m^2 given d.
: ûûû
: -----------------------------------------------------------
: Challenge: 1. Use the numbered word solution form to find  
:               the atoms/m^2 from 1/d in the above problem. 
: Use a method that doesn't require any squaring of atoms.
: Hint: This is a 3 variable problem requiring 3 variables in 
:       the numbered word fraction.  I learned this just by
:       playing around with words in a fraction to aid my 
:       thinking. It takes a little time and understanding of
:       division of a fraction by word "row" to justify the 
:       solution.
: Challenge: 2. Same problem as 1 above, except that
:               1/d = [1/d] bond/m
: Hint: This only requires that a bond^2 = 1 atom to avoid 
:       squaring the atom. 
: -----------------------------------------------------------
-- 
                                             davk@netcom.com
Return to Top
Subject: Re: Mathematica, Maple, Mathcad and similar
From: "Antoine Mathys"
Date: 3 Jan 1997 14:28:35 GMT
> Dear mathematicians,
> Is this newsgroup the forum to seek comments on the relative merits of
> Mathematica, Maple, Mathcad and the like?  If not, can people suggest a 
> newsgroup ?
In fact, this is not the good NewsGroup
There is a good one, especially talking about Mathematica .
comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica
Bye
mmathys@bluewin.ch
Return to Top
Subject: Re: ZEROS of the 2500th degree polinomials
From: tleko@aol.com
Date: 3 Jan 1997 15:00:05 GMT
In article <32CCF562.6113F4E@innet.be> Peter Verthez wrote:
:
:
:> Tleko wrote:
:> 
:> Have you found the error?
:> 
:> tleko@aol.com
:
:As I wrote, I DON'T CARE !!!!!
:Don't ever mail me again (and if you have any brains, you wouldn't
:post on sci.math again either)
           You did.
Thank you,   tleko@aol.com
Return to Top
Subject: Re: fermat
From: "Antoine Mathys"
Date: 3 Jan 1997 14:43:09 GMT
azathoth  a écrit dans l'article
<32CABA3A.6C87@club-internet.fr>...
> does anyone know where I can find the demonstration of the fermat's
theorem ?
In fact, there are many site what speak about Fermat's Last Theorem.
You can find on this page : http://www.msri.org/sched/fermatbib.html
any references about this subject.
The best thing to do is to search the server of an important mathematical
magasine.
For exemple : American Mathematical Monthly .
You can also try to connect to a university's web site.
This site is quite interesting : http://math.uc.edu/orgs.html
mmathys@bluewin.ch
Return to Top
Subject: Re: x^y+y^x>=1
From: b841039@math.ntu.edu.tw (sfly)
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 1997 03:18:32 GMT
ikastan@alumnae.caltech.edu (Ilias Kastanas) wrote:
>In article <5aaqgp$ftd@news.ncu.edu.tw>, sfly  wrote:
>>who can poof that x^y+y^x>=1 with x,y>=0?
>>it's seem to be easy,but not..
>>
>	The nontrivial case is  0 < x, y < 1.  Write it as  x log(1/y) <
>   < -log(1 - x^y), or, with z = 1/y,  x^z log(z) < -log(1 - x).
>	Note that log(m + 1) < 1 + 1/2 + ... + 1/m  (by induction using
>   (1 + 1/m)^m < e... or by integrating  dt/t from t=1 to t=m+1).
>	For some m, m <= z < m+1.  Then  x^z log(z) < x^m log(m + 1) <
>   x^m (1 + 1/2 + ... + 1/m) < x + x^2 /2 + x^3 /3 +... + x^m /m <
>   <  Sum[k=1 to inf] x^k /k  =  -log(1 - x).
>							Ilias
I  have know how to prove it!
Consider the nontrivil case ,0<=x,y<=1
so  let x=1-a,y=1-b
then x^y+y^x=(1-a)^(1-b)+(1-b)^(1-a)=(1-a)/((1-a)^b)+(1-b)/((1-b)^a)
and (1-a)^b<=1-ab ,(1-b)^a<=1-ab
so  x^y+y^x>=(2-a-b)/(1-ab)=1+(1-a)(1-b)/(1-ab)>=1 ##
look like easy.....
Return to Top
Subject: Re: PROBLEMS !!!
From: ags@seaman.cc.purdue.edu (Dave Seaman)
Date: 3 Jan 1997 10:25:17 -0500
In article <32CCE039.1061@mdstud.chalmers.se>,
Jacob   wrote:
>Hi folks. I am a student of The University of Gothenburg in Sweden.
> Please help me with this problem and I would be very grateful...
> 
> Proof that:
> 
>         13 divides (17^47 + 2^12)^14 -4
    |\^/|     Maple V Release 3 (Purdue University)
._|\|   |/|_. Copyright (c) 1981-1994 by Waterloo Maple Software and the
 \  MAPLE  /  University of Waterloo. All rights reserved. Maple and Maple V
 <____ ____>  are registered trademarks of Waterloo Maple Software.
      |       Type ? for help.
> (17^47 + 2^12)^14 mod 13;
                                       4
> Please, do not suggest me to use a computer or a calculator (17^47 is
> quite a large number).
It's not so large -- only 58 digits.
-- 
Dave Seaman			dseaman@purdue.edu
      ++++ stop the execution of Mumia Abu-Jamal ++++
    ++++ if you agree copy these lines to your sig ++++
++++ see http://www.xs4all.nl/~tank/spg-l/sigaction.htm ++++
Return to Top
Subject: recurring sequence 1,3,6,1,6,3,1,9,9
From: jrupe@advtech.uswest.com (Jason Rupe)
Date: 3 Jan 1997 16:07:02 GMT
While driving through Nebraska, I came across an interesting number result.  I haven't worked out much detail around this because I would quess that this is a common result in mathematics that I just haven't run into (I have an engineering OR background).  Here is what I have observed:
Begin with the positive reals 1 2 3 4 5 ....  Then take the partial sums from 1 to n for each n to yield 1 3 6 10 15 ...  Then, sum all digits in each n so that, for example, 10 becomes 1+0=1, 15 becomes 1+5=6 and 148 would become 1+4+8=13 become 1+3=4, and such.  This seems to result (should be easy to prove) in a recurring sequence of 1 3 6 1 6 3 1 9 9.  
In base 6, this also works with a recurring sequence of 1 3 1 5 5.  Notice that in both cases the period is base-1.  I half expected this to also work with base 15, but it doesn`t seem to repeat, unless the period is larger than 14, and base 14 doesn`t seem to work either.  
I would expect that this has already been discovered and studied.  I am interested in hearing about what is known about this phenomenon.  Particularly, is there an easy way of predicting the bases which exhibit the same properties as base 10 and base 6 described above, and are there any with finite recurring sequences greater than base-1? 
---
Jason Rupe, PhD
U S WEST Advanced Technologies
4001 Discovery Drive, Ste. 220
Boulder, CO 80303
Return to Top
Subject: Re: x^y+y^x>=1
From: hrubin@b.stat.purdue.edu (Herman Rubin)
Date: 3 Jan 1997 10:38:23 -0500
In article <32CCA3E3.38D@crpl.cedar-rapids.lib.ia.us>,
William E. Sabin  wrote:
>A = y^x + x^y
I have seen a huge number of postings on this, and none of the ones
I have seen show that this is at least 1 in the positive quadrant, and
in fact is 1 only for x=0 or y=0.  It is clearly undefined if both are 0.
It has been correctly observed that the above is true for either bwing
at least 1.
So I looked at this, and it turns out that there is a relatively
easy way to analyze this.  The proof goes in two parts; the first
one handles much of the domain, and shows that if the theorem is
false, there is a relative minimum in a particular region.  The next
part is to find that minimum.
Notice that if both are non-zero, A > 1 + xln(y) + x^y.  This it is 
sufficient to show that xln(y) + x^y >= 0.  Dividing by x, this means
that ln(y) + x^{y-1} >= 0, or x <= (-ln(y))^{1/(y-1)}.  It is not 
difficult to show that, for y bounded by 1/e, this is larger than y.
So now we look for a relative minimum of the function with both x 
and y at least 1/e.  If we let u = x^y and v = y^x, there derivatives
with respect to x and y are
	(y/x) u   + ln(y) v;
	ln(x) u   + (x/y) v.
If this system of expressions are both to be 0, the determinant of the
coefficient matrix for u and v must be 0.  This can only happen if
ln(x)ln(y) = 1.  Since both x and y are at least 1/e, they must both
be 1/e.  This happens to be a local saddle point, but we do not need
to verify that it is.
-- 
This address is for information only.  I do not claim that these views
are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University.
Herman Rubin, Dept. of Statistics, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette IN47907-1399
hrubin@stat.purdue.edu         Phone: (317)494-6054   FAX: (317)494-0558
Return to Top
Subject: Re: x^y+y^x>=1
From: tony@jobstream.co.uk (Tony Lezard)
Date: 3 Jan 1997 16:13:55 -0000
In article <32CCA3E3.38D@crpl.cedar-rapids.lib.ia.us>,
William E. Sabin  wrote:
[..]
>For various small values of y, "solve" for x using Mathcad numerical 
>methods, using a starting "guess" of 1.0.
[..]
>This is not a "rigorous" proof but it gets the job done, for me at least.
How you can even use the word "proof" in this treatment is beyond me.
-- 
== Tony Lezard ==  |  PGP public key 0xBF172045 available from keyservers
tony@mantis.co.uk  |  or from my home page, http://www.mantis.co.uk/~tony/
Return to Top
Subject: Re: The Inferiority of Cydonian "Math" in Comparison to the Earthly Science-Art
From: caj@sherlock.math.niu.edu (Xcott Craver)
Date: 3 Jan 1997 16:16:34 GMT
Brent Hetherwick  wrote:
>
>I'm unfamiliar with the category of wit.  What are the morphisms?  
>Are there any free objects?  How about interesting functors to the 
>category of sarcasm?
>
	Actually, while I am flattered with these allegations of wit,
I should point out that every post in every newsgroup is equally witty.
For suppose that S is the set of all possible unwitty posts.  Since each 
takes a whole number of bytes, there is a [blunt] least element.  
	Thanks to sarcasm (equivalent to the Axiom of Choice, I know, 
but bite me), any shortest unwitty phrase is pretty damned funny in
its own right, and hence we have a contradiction.
	I'll leave it as an exercise to the reader to prove that there
is no funny joke ending with, "orange you glad I didn't say 'banana?'"
  .,-:::::   :::.         ....:::::: @niu.edu -- http://www.math.niu.edu/~caj/
,;;;'````'   ;;`;;     ;;;;;;;;;````
[[[         ,[[ '[[,   ''`  `[[.     "I'd like a large order of FiboNachos."
$$$        c$$$cc$$$c ,,,    `$$      "Okay sir, that'll cost as much as a
`88bo,__,o, 888   888,888boood88    small order and a medium order combined."
  "YUMMMMMP"YMM   ""` "MMMMMMMM"  _____________________________________________
Return to Top
Subject: Re: circle algorithm
From: Rick Decker
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 1997 10:57:53 +0000
Gary Hampson wrote:
> 
> Circle Problem:
> 
> Why not numerically minimise
> 
>          sqrt[(x-x0)^2 + (y-y0)^2]-r
> 
> Actually this is a similar if not identical problem to the navigation
> triangulation problem. Given three ranges from 3 known locations where
> am I.
> --
Even including the missing \sum in front of your expression, it
won't give a reasonable solution.  If I read your intent correctly,
you'd have to minimize
     \sum{i=1, n}(\sqrt((xi-x0)^2 + (yi-y0)^2)-r)
and one could always make that as small as desired, simply by
chosing r large enough.  What's needed is to minimize the *distance*
from the sample points qi = (xi, yi) to the circle.  A more 
appropriate measure would be the sums of the squares of the distances 
from the sample points to the circle, which, with a little elementary
vector manipulation, comes out to
     D = \sum{i=1, n}(|qi - c| - r)^2,
where |.| denotes the usual Euclidean distance in the plane and
c = (x0, y0) is the center.  This form can actually be used to
find the value of r which minimizes D.  In fact, the value Rmin
is easily found to be
     Rmin = Rbar = (1/n)\sum{i=1, n}|qi - c|
and in that case we must have
     D = \sum{i=1, n}|qi - c|^2 - (1/n)(\sum{i=1, n}|qi - c|)^2
which, tidily enough, is
     n * (mean of squares) - n * (square of mean).
The problem, though, is that this is *really* messy when you try
to find the values of the x- and y-coordinates of the center which
minimize this expression.
Regards,
Rick
-----------------------------------------------------
Rick Decker                   rdecker@hamilton.edu
Department of Comp. Sci.      315-859-4785
Hamilton College
Clinton, NY  13323            =  !=  ==  (!)
-----------------------------------------------------
Return to Top
Subject: Re: PROBLEMS !!!
From: Jacob
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 1997 17:22:57 +0100
Dave Seaman wrote:
> 
> In article <32CCE039.1061@mdstud.chalmers.se>,
> Jacob   wrote:
> >Hi folks. I am a student of The University of Gothenburg in Sweden.
> > Please help me with this problem and I would be very grateful...
> >
> > Proof that:
> >
> >         13 divides (17^47 + 2^12)^14 -4
> 
>     |\^/|     Maple V Release 3 (Purdue University)
> ._|\|   |/|_. Copyright (c) 1981-1994 by Waterloo Maple Software and the
>  \  MAPLE  /  University of Waterloo. All rights reserved. Maple and Maple V
>  <____ ____>  are registered trademarks of Waterloo Maple Software.
>       |       Type ? for help.
> > (17^47 + 2^12)^14 mod 13;
> 
>                                        4
> 
> > Please, do not suggest me to use a computer or a calculator (17^47 is
> > quite a large number).
> 
> It's not so large -- only 58 digits.
OK, the number is not so large but using a computer is not nearly as fun
and also it is cheat...
Anyway, the problem is solved
	//Jacob
Return to Top
Subject: Detailed Contents for Godel, Escher, Bach
From: cybermonk@cybtrans.com (Cybermonk)
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 1997 17:30:49 GMT
http://www.cybtrans.com/philosph/geb.htm
Return to Top
Subject: Re: Fourier transform of non-linearities...
From: Simon Read
Date: 3 Jan 97 16:58:54 GMT
You've defined a non-linear finction g() which is
applied to the time-domain functin.
There are some things you can transfer between the time and frequency
domains. If you multiply two things in the time domain, it's like
convolving their DFTs. If you convolve two things in the time domain,
it's like multiplying their DFTs. This is the reason that a lot of
convolution gets done in the frequency domain instead of in the
time domain: multiplying is a lot quicker than convolving.
But now you want a non-linear function of the time-domain sequence and you
want to find the equivalent in the frequency domain. Tricky. I don't
know if it's possible in the general case but I can give you a
good approximation.
First, let g(x) = x^2.  That's exactly like multiplying two functions,
(which happen to be identical) so you need to convolve their DFTs.
You can do it with a simple loop over the components of your DFT but
it's more effort than doing the multiplication the simple way.
Secondly, let g(x) = polynomial of x:   A0 + A1x + A2x^2 etc.
Each term can be added inside or outside the DFT, so treat them separately.
Each term is a multiplication, so it comes out as a convolution inside
the DFT. It only takes one convolution to go from x^n to x^(n+1)
because you haven't thrown away your original DFT of x, have you?
so for an nth-degree polynomial, you must do n convolutions in the
frequency domain. This is all still exact, no approximations.
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  ***********************
Thirdly, approximate your real g() as a polynomial. Depending how
large your signal is, you might get reasonable approximations with
a low-order approximation. Each successive term in the polynomial
will apply a correction.
The above really is a lot of effort. It's so much more effort than
just transforming back to the time domain and applying g(), even
if your Fourier transform is not a fast one.
Even one convolution in the frequency domain would be more simply
done by transforming back to the time domain where you can multiply.
However, there might be one or two insights into what g() is
doing to your spectrum if you input a pure sine wave and watched
the resulting spectrum as its amplitude got larger and larger. There
would be all sorts of distortion harmonics developing, rather
reminiscent of an amplifier which is being fed a signal which is
too large. Hmm. That wouldn't be your application, would it? It
seems to me that g() resembles an amplifier which is initially
linear, but which saturates at higher amplitude. Mind you, lots
of physical systems behave like this. Since you use k (wavenumber)
rather than f or omega, I'm inclined to think there are some
physical waves in a medium and that medium saturates somehow.
[===>>YOUR QUESTION<<===]
    Can I apply, say, the Fourier transform of g(\sigma) to each
    point of F(k), i.e.,
            if DFT[g(\sigma)]  =  G(k), then is  IDFT[G(F(k))] = g(f(t)),
            where DFT is the discrete Fourier transform and IDFT
            is the inverse discrete Fourier transform?  (*)
[===>>YOUR QUESTION<<===]
g(sigma) is a time-domain function. t goes in, amplitude comes out.
because you've said that sigma is a finction of time.
G(k) is a frequency-domain function. k goes in, amplitude comes out.
F(k) is similarly a frequency-domain function. Amplitude comes out.
You can't take G() of anything which is not a frequency. G() just
won't operate on amplitude, which is what you're asking it to do
when you write G(F(k)) .
Simon
Return to Top
Subject: Re: 4 lines / Wlod-1996
From: Simon Read
Date: 3 Jan 97 17:02:05 GMT
ray@scribbledyne.com (Ray Heinrich) wrote:
>  i'm one of those little trees you
>  see hanging from rear view mirrors
and I'm one of those little mirrors you
see hanging from christmas trees.
Return to Top
Subject: Re: Angle trisection
From: bp887@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Angel Garcia)
Date: 3 Jan 1997 16:52:36 GMT
Robin Chapman (rjc@maths.ex.ac.uk) writes:
> Angel Garcia wrote:
>>   I worked out (at 17: thus elementarily) the cubic equation which
>> is fulfiled by the side of inscribed convex heptagon (angle 2*pi/7).
>> I can post it here if it is of some interest. The solution has two
>> complex-conjugate solutions plus the real solution, of course; which
>> only can be obtained in terms of cubic roots and therefore it cannot
>> geometrically be constructed via Plato's tools (ruler & compass).
>> But in any case the solution can be expressed explicitly in terms
>> of two relatively simple cubic roots with complex radicands.
> 
> In the recent "The Book of Numbers" (Springer 1996) Conway and Guy
> give constructions for regular 7, 9 and 13-gons using straightedge,
> compass and angle trisector. The heptagon construction is amazingly
> neat.
> 
     Still has not arrived to U of T. I will look for it as soon as
it arrives.
   Yes: adding trisection to ruler&compass; makes many classical problems
feasible. I wonder which type of approximation or method these recent
Conway and Guy use for trisection.
Trisection is not achievable with ruler&compass; alone, of course: the
simplest case is trisection of 60 degrees (or construction of 20degrees
angle) which is usually shown to be impossible via Plato's restriction
in almost any book dealing with the three classicals:
A)Duplication of the cube or 'delian problem'
B)Trisection of any given angle
C)Squaring the circle.
--
Angel, secretary of Universitas Americae (UNIAM). His proof of ETI at
Cydonia and complete Index of new "TETET-96: Faces on Mars.." by Prof.
Dr. D.G. Lahoz (leader on ETI and Cosmogony) can be studied at URL:
     http://www.ncf.carleton.ca/~bp887    ***************************
Return to Top
Subject: Re: The Inferiority of Cydonian "Math" in Comparison to the Earthly Science-Art
From: Jiri Mruzek
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 1997 00:28:09 -0800
Brent Hetherwick wrote:
> 
> Jiri Mruzek (jirimruzek@lynx.bc.ca) wrote:
> : Hmm, yours is an answer in the witty category.
> 
> I'm unfamiliar with the category of wit.  What are the morphisms?
> Are there any free objects?  How about interesting functors to the
> category of sarcasm?
> 
> $$$ 666 $$$ 666 $$$ 666 $$$ 666 $$$ 666 $$$ 666 $$$ 666 $$$ 666 $$$ 666
>                        hetherwi@math.wisc.edu
Pardon me, but a spelling mistake crept in. Twas not wit.
Twas supposed to be a short for "to wit" = "twit".
Regards,
It (just slightly more than 1/2 wit),
Return to Top
Subject: Re: The Inferiority of Cydonian "Math" in Comparison to the Earthly Science-Art
From: Jiri Mruzek
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 1997 00:57:49 -0800
Judith Stroud wrote:
> 
> Jiri Mruzek wrote:
> >
> > Xcott Craver wrote:
> >  rest of quote marks omitted ***** Since such shortcomings
 are not afflicting my own work, you, or anyone else, has a choice
 of specific subjects to focus onto in the intended debunking. 
 Pick a theme and do it, if you can.
Frankly, if you do, you will have disproved Euclid too,
for the ancient diagrams are purely Euclidean, though they were
encoded some 12,000 years before Euclid.
You can enumerate these, and debunk them all, one by one. Except,
it has never been done.
My findings don't have a weak spot. Can you find anything
wrong with the encoding method? Can you find boo-boos and slips
of the brain? Take the so called Frame, for instance. The whole
thing works wonderfully, based on a set of just a dozen points.
How will you criticise it?
Here is what someone wrote in February. It is typical of the
Science-Art phenom, and of the Monkey's opponents stumbling around,
s if they were knocked out on their feet.
> > Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 22:26:55 GMT
> > > Len Piotrowski (lpiotrow@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu) wrote:
> > > : In article  Doug Weller wrote
> > >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Re: Nazca Monkey: Refutation
> >
> >     This is a blank electronic form. Fill it out, and forward it,
> >     to the group.
> >     Remember, we had a lot of general comment. Would you like
> >     to add to it? - Do you have something specific on your mind?
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > If this doesn't remind you of the Ed Conrad, Danniken, Velikovsky
comedy one least bit - you're right, and hence fit enough to
answer my charges: You have added your banal joke to the fetid
heap of adverse general comment on Nasca Monkey, mister. Now, do
you have something specific on your mind to say for yourself? Or,
are you here just to be a clown?
When will pseudosavants (like you) realize that they are standing
in the way of a genuine discovery? This is no occasion for a little
ego massage, attacking indefensible feeble-minded chimeras. This
time, you are biting granite.
> > Post-seasonally bleak regards,
> > Jiri
> Do you know that you can solve for the distance from the earth to the
> sun in the angle and height of a fotomat booth's pyramid roof? Umberto
> Eco did. 
Accompany your testimonial by an example. Let's see the solution.
I didn't know, and I'm not sure I want to see the silly etude.
It would make me point out the fundamental differences between it
and a serious study, such as mine. 
> Foucault's Pendulum is hardly a repository of arcana. The
> essence of numbers and numerology is that everything can be reduced or
> extrapolated into anything else - reference the 666 in Nero, Hitler and
> Napoleon's name.
Are you saying that numerology is a science? Are you comparing Euclidean
geometry to pliable chaos? BTW, I don't see no 666 in the above names.
 Were they all the antichrist?  
Shouldn't it be "antichrists"?
> I can calculate the
> circumference of the earth with my left breast and the right formula.
> This is merely evidence that numbers permeate the universe, not that
> anyone happened to do it on purpose...
So according to you, there is no way to record exact information
into art? Don't you know the difference between a deliberate creation
and natural order (or chaos)?
> Unless the creators of the local fotomat had astronomy and perhaps
> quantum physics in mind when they built a one-hour photo processing
> booth in the local grocery store plaza...
Sigh, more general comment to deal with. Go ahead and reread the quotes.
The complaint was that there was too much general comment. I've news
for you, your general comments were made while your face was diverted
from the object you were slandering. If you can't bear to look into
the radiant face of reality, you will forever stumble in the dark.
Hmm,
Jiri
Return to Top
Subject: algebra problem
From: Wieschebrink@t-online.de (Christian Wieschebrink)
Date: 30 Dec 1996 17:11:44 GMT
Does anyone know a proof of the statement below?
I can't find the answer myself.
    There are no positive integers p,q, such that 
    p^3 - q^2 = 1 
    is true.
Of course the conjecture might be wrong. What is
the smallest solution (p,q) then?
Return to Top
Subject: Re: x^y+y^x>=1
From: Richard Mentock
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 1997 12:26:14 -0500
sfly wrote:
> 
> ikastan@alumnae.caltech.edu (Ilias Kastanas) wrote:
> 
> >In article <5aaqgp$ftd@news.ncu.edu.tw>, sfly  wrote:
> >>who can poof that x^y+y^x>=1 with x,y>=0?
> >>it's seem to be easy,but not..
> >>
> 
> >       The nontrivial case is  0 < x, y < 1.  Write it as  x log(1/y) <
> >   < -log(1 - x^y), or, with z = 1/y,  x^z log(z) < -log(1 - x).
> 
> >       Note that log(m + 1) < 1 + 1/2 + ... + 1/m  (by induction using
> >   (1 + 1/m)^m < e... or by integrating  dt/t from t=1 to t=m+1).
> 
> >       For some m, m <= z < m+1.  Then  x^z log(z) < x^m log(m + 1) <
> >   x^m (1 + 1/2 + ... + 1/m) < x + x^2 /2 + x^3 /3 +... + x^m /m <
> >   <  Sum[k=1 to inf] x^k /k  =  -log(1 - x).
> 
> >                                                       Ilias
> 
> I  have know how to prove it!
> Consider the nontrivil case ,0<=x,y<=1
> so  let x=1-a,y=1-b
> then x^y+y^x=(1-a)^(1-b)+(1-b)^(1-a)=(1-a)/((1-a)^b)+(1-b)/((1-b)^a)
> and (1-a)^b<=1-ab ,(1-b)^a<=1-ab
This works for a=b=.5, for instance, but not for a=b=.1
Try again!
> so  x^y+y^x>=(2-a-b)/(1-ab)=1+(1-a)(1-b)/(1-ab)>=1 ##
> look like easy.....
-- 
D.
mentock@mindspring.com
http://www.mindspring.com/~mentock/index.htm
Return to Top
Subject: Re: prime number problem
From: haha@astral.magic.ca (Hans Havermann)
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 1997 12:23:44 -0500
The Universal Heretic  wrote:
> Has anyone thusfar observed that the pattern is different for n<=9?
> Visually, the pattern creates palindromes for n<=9 and n=11 but 
> does not create palendromes otherwise.
As originally formulated,
"123456789101112...(n-1)n(n-1)...121110987654321", Kn, for n=11 (i.e.,
123456789101110987654321), is *not* a palindrome.
-- 
HaHa
Rarebit Dreams
Return to Top
Subject: Re: Math tricks/jokes? - math.jok (1/1)
From: HdeJonge@ravelin.nl (Herre de Jonge)
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 1997 17:49:57 GMT
"David A. Lyons"  wrote:
[]There was something similar about how something started
simple and was
[]made to be very complicated.
[]It started as:
[]1 + 1 = 2
[]Then some substitutions were made.  One of the 1s was
replaced by
[]"sin^2(x)+cos^2(x)" and the other 1 was substituted by
some other
[]identy, as well as the 2.  The end was a complete mess.
[]Anybody seen that?
Well... I've got this list of math jokes. Maybe you like
'em.
Cheers,
   Herre
begin 644 math.jok
M2&5R92=S('-O;64@;6%T:"!R96QA=&5D(&AU;6]R(&]B=&%I;F5D(&9R;VT-
M"G9A,B`M(#DR>5XR(#T@,2!I2!P87)E;G0G2!P
M;W-T960@:6YC;W)R96-T;'DN#0H@5&AE;(&EN;=&5G2!S979E;BP-"G!L=7,@9FEV92!T:6UE6]U('-E92P-"B`@("`@("`@5&AA;B`S('!O
M:6YT(#$@-"`Q(#4@.2X-"@T**")4:&4@3'5R92!O9B!T:&4@3&EM97;)I8VLB
M(&)Y(%2!,+B!#87)T97(I+@T*#0HM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+0T*#0I)9B!I;G-I9&4@82!C:7)C;&4@82!L:6YE#0I(:71S
M('1H92!C96YT97(@86YD(&=O97,@&EM871I;VX@=&\@2X-"D$@('!H>7-I8VES="!T:&EN;:W,@
M2!I2!S8VAO;VQ=(&ES;(')I9VAT(&YE;
M>'0@=&\@=&AE;(&=R860@2!O9B!'96%R2!O9B!G96%R2X-"E5P;VX@9FEN:7-H
M:6YG+"!T:&4@96YG:6YE97(@;F]T960@=&AA;="!T:&4@'!E7-I8VES="!I;6UE9&EA;=&5L>2!C87)R:65D
M(&AI;7-I8VES="P@:&%D(&$@:&]R2!B96QI979E9`T*=&AA;="!A(&AO;0T*=&AE;
M;W)I97,A("!"=70@;F]W('EO=2!A6UO2!T:&%T('1R86YS8V5N9&5N=&%L(&YU;
M;6)E0T*8VAA;&QE;F=E9#\-"@T*36%N:69O
M;&1S(&%R92!P97)S;VYI9F]L9',@*&AU;6%N:69O;&1S*2X-"@T*3F5I9VAB
M;W)H;V]D2(@+2!T:&4@9G5N8W1I;VX@:7,@(F-O
M;G9E0T*8VAA;&QE;F=E9"(@=&AE;2!D:60@=&AE;(&-O;7!U
M=&5R('-C:65N=&ES;="!D:64@:6X@=&AE;('-H;W=E2!D;R!C;VUP=71E7!O=&5N=7-E
M+"!#3U,@/2!!9&IA8V5N;="](+"!404X@/2!/+T$I+@T*#0HQ+B`@("`@(%-/
M2$-!2%1/00DH2!/;&0@2&%R6-L97,@("`@
M("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@,B!M96=A
M8WEC;&5S#0H-"C$@=6YI="!O9B!S=7-P96YS92!I;B!A;B!!9V%T:&$@0VAR
M:7-T:64@;F]V96P@("`@("`@("`@,2!W:&]D('5N:70-"@T*+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2T-"@T*5&AR964;@3&%W6YA;6EC71H:6YG('=I=&AO;=70@=V]R:VEN9R!F;W(@:70N
M#0H-"E-E8V]N9"!,872!W;W)K(&ES;('1O(&)R96%K(&5V96XN#0H-"E1H:7)D($QA=SH@(%EO=2!C
M86XG="!B2!T;R!T:&4@=&%N9V5N="!L:6YE
M/PT*03H@(E-T;W`@=&]U8VAI;F<@;64A(@T*#0HM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+0T*#0I!(&UA;=&AE;6%T:6-I86X@:7,@82!P
M97)S;VX@=VAO('-A>7,@=&AA;="P@=VAE;B`S('!E;W!L92!A2!O9B!T:&4@86)O
M=F4I#0H-"B`@("`J($E"32!00PT*#0H@("`@*B!!<'!L92!-86-I;G1O6]U6]U(')E86-H('1H92!P:6YN86-L92!O9B!M;V1E6]U2`J=VEL;"H@8F4-"B`@("`@('5N9&5R2X@
M($YE=F5R#0H@("`@("!A9V%I;B!F6]U6]U(&=I=F4@=&AE;2!A(&=O;V0@*G=H
M86-K(2H-"B`@("`@('5P6]U<@T*("`@("`@9&EN;W-A=7(_("!4
M:&ES;(&1O97-N)W0@:&%P<&5N('=I=&@@9W)A9"X@2!G:79E('1H96T-"B`@("`@('1H92!0:$0@86YD(&)O
M;W0@=&AE;2!O=70@;VYT;R!T:&4@2!C;VYS=6UE(&AO;="!S<&EC;>0T*("`@("`@
M8VAI;F5S92!D:7-H97,L(&-H96%P('1A8V\@'!A;G-I;VX@;W!T
M:6]N2!A6]U6]U,2X-"DAE)W,@86QW87ES(&=O:6YG
M(&]F9B!O;B!A('1A;F=E;G0N#0H-"BTM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM#0H-"D$@;6%T:&5M871I8VEA;B!A;F0@82!P:'ES:6-I
M6]U7-I8VES="!I;BX@($AE(&5X<&QA;:6YS('1H92!S
M:71U871I;VXL(&%N9"!T:&4@<&AY;6]U(')E86QI>F4@=&AA;="!Y;W4G
M;&P;@;F5V97(@7-I8W,@9&5P87)T;65N="X@(")7:'D@9&\@22!A;'=A>7,@:&%V92!T
M;R!G:79E('EO=0T*9W5Y'!E;G-I=F4@97%U:7!M96YT(&%N9`T*6]U(&)E(&QI;:V4@=&AE;(&UA;=&@@9&5P87)T;65N="`M(&%L
M;"!T:&5Y(&YE960-;"FES(&UO;F5Y(&9O2!D97!A&ES;=',A(B!A;F0@9V]E6EN9R!T:&4@96=G+@T*#0I397%U96PZ("!4:&ES;('1I;64@
M=&AE;>2!A2!A;B!E9V<@*&YO;(&9I2!A;F0@<')O
M9'5C97,@82!C87)E9G5L;'D@8V]O:V5D(&5G9SL@86YD('1H92!M871H96UA
M=&EC;:6%N#0IL:6=H=',@82!F:7)E(&EN;('1H92!C;W)N97(L(&%N9"!S87ES
M("))(&AA;=F4@7-I8VES="!A;F0@82!M871H96UA=&EC;:6%N('-E='1I;F<@:6X@82!F
M86-U;'1Y(&QO;=6YG92X@#0I3=61D96YL>2P@=&AE;(&-O9F9E92!M86-H:6YE
M(&-A=&-H97,@;VX@9FER92X@(%1H92!P:'ES:6-I7-I
M8VES="P@=&AU;2!B
M965N('-O;'9E9"!A;F0-"F=O97,@8F%C:R!T;R!S;&5E<"X-"@T*+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2T-"@T*02!M871H96UA=&EC;
M:6%N(&%N9"!A('!H>7-I8VES="!W97)E(&%S:V5D('1H92!F;VQL;W=I;F<@
M<75E61R86YT+"!T=7)N(&]N('1H92!W871E6]U('=A;&ME9;"!B>2!A(&AO;
M=7-E(&%N9"!S87<@82!H;W-E(&-O;FYE8W1E9"!T;PT*("`@("`@("!A(&AY;
M9')A;G0N("!7:&%T('=O=6QD('EO=2!D;S\-"@T*4#H@22!W;W5L9"!K965P
M('=A;&MI;F61R
M86YT(&%N9"!S970@=&AE;(&AO;=7-E(&]N(&9I0T*=V5N="!T;R!S964@82!C;W5N2!H860@9V]O9"!P'0L(&AE;('!U="!T:&5M(&EN;=&\@80T*71H:6YG(&)U="!I;7!R97-S
M(&]N;&]O:V5R2!T
M:&ES;('1I;64@=VES97,@=7`@86YD#0IV86YI6]U(&UE86X;_
M(B!P:7!E2!K;F5W(&ET;('=A7-I8VES="P@86YD
M(&%N(&5N9VEN965R('=E7,@=&AE;('!H>7-I8VES="P@(EEO=2!M96%N('1H870@2!A#0I0:'ES:6-I'!R97-S:6YG('1H92!R96QA=&EO;G-H:7`@
M8F5T=V5E;B!T:&4-"@D@("`@("`@8VER8W5M9F5R96YC92!O9B!A(&-IF5R.@T*#0I!(&UA;=&AE;6%T:6-I86X@=VEL;"!B92!A8FQE('1O
M(&-A;&-U;&%T92!W:&5R92!T:&4@7-I8VES="!W:6QL(&)E(&%B;&4@=&\@97AP;&%I;B!H;W<@=&AE;('-H96QL
M(&=E=',@=&AE;2!T;R!C871C:"!I="X-"@T*+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2T-"@T*06X@96YG:6YE97(L(&$@<&AY;2!T:&%T('EO=2!H879E(&YO;#0ID;W5B="!A;')E861Y(&AE87;)D+B`@069T
M97(@F5S('1H92!S:71U871I;VX@86YD('-T87)T
M2!T:&%T(&AE;('=A2!D:60@=&AE;(&UA;=&AE;6%T:6-I86X@;F%M
M92!H:7,@9&]G(")#875C:'DB/PT*03H@0F5C875S92!H92!L969T(&$@2!Y;W4@9&5M86YD(&9R;VT@86X@:6YT97)P;VQA=&EO;
M;@T*("`@9G5N8W1I;VXL('1H92!M;W)E(&5X<&5N2!M871H96UA=&EC;:6%N7-I
M8VES="!;;W(@96YG:6YE97(L(&]R(&UU;2!A6]U(&-R;W-S
M(#4P(&9E;6%L92!P:6=S(&%N9"`U,"!M86QE(&1E97(_#0I!.B!/;F4@:'5N
M9')E9"!S;W=S+6%N9"UB=6-K2!T:&4@6]U7,@(DAE"!J;VME6]U(&)E;&EE;=F4@:6X@;VYE
M($=O9#\-"@E!;G-W97(Z(%EE2!F:6YI=&5L>2!M86YY(&YE87;(M6UB;VQS(&%R92!U6]U
M(&1O(&YO;="!K;F]W('=H870@>6]U(&%R92!T86QK:6YG(&%B;W5T+B(-"@T*
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2T-"@T*2&5I2!D;R!I=`T*#0I!;&=E8G)A:7-T2P@(D5I=&AE;2X@(%1H92!E;F=I;F5E7-I8VES="!H860@=V]R:V5D(&]U="!T:&4@
M86YG;&4@;F5C97-S87)Y('1O(&MN;V-K('1H92!L:61S(&]F9@T*=&AE;('1I
M;B`@8V%N2!T:')O=VEN9R!T:&5M(&%G86EN2!I;B`Q.3,X(&)Y(")(+B!0971A2P@=V4@8V%N('9I
M97<@=&AE;(&1EF%N;RU796EE2!A(&QI;F4@0T*;F%R2!C;VYS=')U8W0@82!C=7)V92!C;VYT
M86EN:6YG(&5V97)Y('!O:6YT(&EN;('1H90T*9&5S97)T+B`@270@:&%S(&)E
M96X@<')O=F5N(%LQ72!T:&%T('-U8V@@82!C=7)V92!C86X@8F4@=')A=F5R
M2!S:&]R="!T:6UE+B`@3F]W('=E('1R879E
M2!M971H;V0-"@T*5V4@97AA;6EN
M92!A(&QI;VXM=F%L=65D(&9U;F-T:6]N(&8H>BDN($)E(%QZ971A('1H92!C
M86=E+B`@0V]NB`M(%QZ971A#0H-"B`@("`@("`@("`@("`@($,-
M"@T*=VAE2!O9B!T:&4@9&5S
M97)T+B`@271S('9A;'5E(&ES;(&8H>F5T82DL#0II+F4N('1H97)E(&ES;(&$@
M;&EO;B!I;B!T:&4@8V%G92!;,UTN#0H-"C$N.2!4:&4@5VEE;F5R+51A=6)E
M2Q<:6YF:6YI='DI+`T*=VAO2!O=&AE;2!W92!C86X@87!P0T*8VQOF5R;R!P2!O9B!T:&4@;&EO;B!B96EN9R!I;@T*=&AE;(&-A9V4N("!3:70@86YD
M('=A:70N#0H-"C(N,R!4:&4@475A;G1U;2!-96%S=7)E;65N="!-971H;V0-
M"@T*5V4@87-S=6UE('1H870@=&AE;('-E>"!O9B!T:&4@;&EO;B!I"!C86X@7-I8W,@;65T:&]D#0H-"DEN2!A($UA:F]R86YA
M(&5X8VAA;F=E#0IO<&5R871O6YA;6EC71H:6YG(&)U="!L:6]NF]N=&%L#0IC;VUP;VYE
M;G0@;V8@=&AE;(&5A6)O9'D@:VYO=W,L#0IA(&AI9V;@@:7)O;B!C;VYT96YT
M+B`@5&AE;('-P:6YA8V@@:7,@96%T96X@8GD@=F5G971A2!T:&4@8V%T(&UI;G0@;&5N2!O9B!&=6YC=&EO;G,@;V8@
M82!296%L#0H@("`@5F%R:6%B;&4@86YD('1H92!4:&5O&-E<'0@
M9F]R(&%T(&UO;7-I8W,B+"`X#0H@("`@*#$Y,S8I+"!P
M<"`X,BTR,CDL(&5S<"X@<'`@,3`V+3$P-PT*6S==(&EB;:60-"@T*+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+0T*#0HT($-O;G1R:6)U=&EO;G,@9G)O;2!#;VUP=71E2!U2!U&EN9R;!T:&4@2!T;R!C871C:"X@(%=E('1H97)E9F]R
M92!C871C:"!I="!A;F0@8V%L;"!I="!A(&QI;VXN#0H-"C0N-2!4:&4@8V]M
M;6]N(&QA;F=U86=E(&%P<')O86-H+@T*#0I)9B!O;FQY(&5V97)Y;VYE('5S
M960@041!+T-O;6UO;B!,:7-P+U!R;VQO9RP@=&AI;6]U(')E86-H('1H92!R:6=H=`T*:&%N9"!E9&=E
M+B`@268@>6]U(')E86-H('1H92!R:6=H="!H86YD(&5D9V4L('1A:V4@;VYE
M('-T97`-"G-O=71H=V%R9',L(&%N9"!P0T*2!A
M9V%I;BX-"@T*-"XX(%1H92!$:6IK2!T:&4@<')O8FQE;2!R96%C:&5D(&UE;('=A2!O9B!S=&%T
M:6YG('1H92!P&EO;2`S.B!.3U0H3&EO;B!E;&5M(&-A9V4I#0H-"E=E
M(&]B2!A8V-O;7!L:7-H960@=VET
M:"!T:&4@2!I;7!L96UE;G1E9"!B>2!O<&5N:6YG('1H
M92!D;V]R('1O('1H92!C86=E(&%N9"!S:&%K:6YG#0IO=70@86YY(&QI;VYS
M('1H870@:&%P<&5N('1O(&)E('1H97)E(&EN;:71I86QL>2X-"BA%;F0@;V8@
M;F]T92`P+BD-"@T*5&AE;(&]B=FEO=7,@<')O9W)A;2!S=')U8W1U6EN9R!T:&%T('=E('1H97)E9F]R92!D;R!N
M;W0@:&%V92!T;PT*F$-"DEN($UA
M=&AE;6%T:6-A;"!#:7)C;&5S("@R('9O;'5M97,I("T@2&]W87)D($5V97,-
M"DUA=&AE;6%T:6-A;"!#:7)C;&5S(%)E=FES:71E9"`M($AO=V%R9"!%=F5S
M#0I-871H96UA=&EC86P;@0VER8VQE7-I2`H=&\@=&AE;(&)E"!D964@97@L#0IE
M92!T;R!T:&4@=VAY(&1E92!W:'DL#0IS:6YE('@L(&-O2P-"F1E71E+"!B>71E+"!B>71E(0T*#0HM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+0T*#0I/=&AE;W!I?7MR:&]]36%N:6%C+B`@4B!5("`Q+#(_
M#0H@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("!O("`@("`@("`@/"T@
M6]U(&YO;="!O;F4L('1O;S\B("`B5VAY(&YO;=#\B
M*0T*#0I&(%4@7'MC86YW)E861TUS=%Q](%Q[=7-E
M7'T@5&58#0HH(DEF('EO=2!C86X@6]N('-O;65W
M:&5R92X@($]N92!O9B!T:&4@=&AR964;@;65N('-A>7,L(")))W9E(&=O="!A
M;B!I9&5A+@T*5V4@8V%N(&-A;&P;@9F]R(&AE;'`@:6X@=&AI;2!H96%R('1H92!E
M8VAO('-E=F5R86P@=&EM97;,N*0T*#0HQ-2!M:6YU=&5S(&QA;=&5R+"!T:&5Y
M(&AE87;(@=&AI;7,L(")4:&%T(&UU;
MGIL960L(&]N
M92!O9B!T:&4@;W1H97(@;65N(&%S:W,L(")7:'D@9&\@>6]U('-A>2!T:&%T
M/R(-"@T*5&AE;(')E<&QY.B;`B1F]R('1H2P@22!P2!T:&5R92=S(&$@2!L;W-T+"!W:&5N#0IS=61D96YL>2!H92!F:6YD6EN9R!N97AT('1O(&$@=&%L;"!O9F9I8V4@8G5I;&1I;F2!T;R!T:&4@
M6]U
M('=E2P@8G5T($D@9&]N)W0-"G5N9&5R
M2!O6]U)W)E('1H92!0;W!E+B(-"B`@("!(92!T:&]U9VAT
M(&9O"YC;VT@*$UE71H:6YG#0IF
M;VQL;W=E9"!F2!!6]U2!L;V=I8VEA
M;G,N#0H-"BTM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM#0H-
M"E1(12!35$]262!/1B!"04)%3#H-"@T*26X@=&AE;(&)E9VEN;FEN9R!T:&5R
M92!W87,@;VYL>2!O;F4@:VEN9"!O9B!-871H96UA=&EC;:6%N+"!C2!T:&5Y(&QO;VME
M9"!U<"!I;B!T:&4@:&5A=F5N64@8V]U;&0@2!S970@;W5T
M(&EN;(&)U:6QD:6YG(&$@36%T:&5M871I8V%L#0IE9&EF;:6-E('1H870@=V%S
M('1O(')E86-H('5P(&%S(&9A"X-"@T*5&AE;(&9O;&QO;=VEN9R!M;W)N:6YG('-A=R!O;FQY(')U8F)L
M92!W:&5R92!T:&5R92!O;F-E('=A2!O;F4L('1H92!-871H96UA
M=&EC;:6%N2!W87,-"FMI;&QE9;#L@8G5T
M('=H96X@=&AE;>2!B96=A;B!T;R!S<&5A:R!T;R!O;F4@86YO=&AE;2!C;W5L9"!N;W0@=6YD97)S
M=&%N9"!E86-H(&]T:&5R+B`@5&AE;>2!A;&P;@2!T:&4@5&]P;VQO9VES=',@2!*;V5L($4N($-O
M:&5N/RDZ#0H-"@T*5&\@:6QL=7-T2!I;G1I;6ED871I;VXN
M*0T*#0I02!H879E('1W;R!L96=S#0IA;F0@:6X@9G)O;G0@
M=&AE;>2!H879E(&9O2!A;B!O9&0@;G5M8F5R(&]F(&QE9W;,@9F]R
M(&$@:&]R2`Q+B`@179E2UQ=6%N=&EF;:65D(&-O;F1I=&EO;F%L
M("=&;W(@86QL('@L(&EF;('@@:7,@82!H;W)S92P@=&AE;B!X(&ES;#0IT:&4@
M2!B92!G96YE
M"P@
M:68@>"!I71H:6YG(&ES;('=H:71E+@T*#0I0&ES;
M="`H9F]R#0IP2!B;&%T86YT(&%S2`Q(&5V97)Y=&AI;F<-"FES('=H:71E+@T*#0I4:&5O7,@=&5L;"!T
M:&4@=')U=&@@*&9O2`R(&5V97)Y=&AI;F<@:7,@=VAI=&4[#0IH96YC92!!;&5X86YD97(@8V]U
M;&0@;F]T(&AA;=F4@2!T2!A;B!O2!A;B!O9&0@;G5M8F5R(&]F(&QI;6)S(&9O2!N=6UB97(@=VAI8V@@:7,@979E;B!A;F0@;V1D
M(&ES;(&EN9FEN;:71Y.R!H96YC92!!;&5X86YD97(-"FAA9"!A;B!I;F9I;FET
M92!N=6UB97(@;V8@;&EM8G;,N("!792!H879E('1H=7,@<')O=F5D('1H870@
M06QE>&%N9&5R('1H90T*1W)E870@9&ED;(&YO;="!E>&ES;="!A;F0@=&AA;="!H
M92!H860@86X@:6YF:6YI=&4@;G5M8F5R(&]F(&QI;6)S+@T*#0I3979E7-I8W,-"G-T=61E
M;G0@=&AE;B!S86ED+"`B22=M(&YO;="!S=7)E(&]F('1H92!V86QI9&ET;>2!O
M9B!Y;W5R('!R;V]F+"!B=70@20T*=&AI;FL@22=L;"!T6]U2!B860@<&EC;='5R
M92!J;VME2!T6=O;BXB#0H-"BTM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM#0H-"DQU;6)E6QE+6\M<&AO8FEA;/PT*#0I!
M.B!4:&4@9F5A7-I8W,@:F]K93H-"@T*
M("`@(")%;F5R9WD@97%U86QS(&UI;&L;@8VAO8V]L871E('-Q=6%R92(-"@T*
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2T-"@T*4G5S2!';V1E;"!I65R(&%N9"!A(&UA;=&AE;6%T:6-I86X@=V5R92!D:7-C=7-S
M:6YG('1H92!R96QA=&EV90T;*;65R:71S(&]F(&AA;=FEN9R!A('=I9F4@;W(@
M82!M:7-T6]U
M(&-A;B!D;R!S;VUE(&UA;=&AE;6%T:6-S+@T*#0HM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+0T*#0I6;VX@3F5U;6%N;B!A;F0@3F]R8F5R
M="!7:65N97(@=V5R92!B;W1H('1H92!S=6)J96-T(&]F(&UA;GD@9&]T='D-
M"G!R;V9E2!H
M860@=&AE;(&AA8FET;(&]F('-I;7!L>0T*=W)I=&EN9R;!A;G-W97)S('1O(&AO;
M;65W;W)K(&%S2!T;R!S;VQV92!T:&4@<')O8FQE;2X-"E9O;B!.975M86YN(&QO;VME
M9"!B;&%N:R!F;W(@82!M;VUE;G0L('1H;W5G:'0L(&%N9"!T:&5N(&%N2!M;W9E9"!F2!U2!H860@;6]V960@=&\L('-H92!W2!I;B!H:7,@:61E82P-"F%N9"!T:')E=R!T:&4@<&EE8V4;@;V8@<&%P97(@
M87=A>2X@($%T('1H92!E;F0@;V8@=&AE;(&1A>2!H92!W96YT(&AO;64-"BAT
M;R!T:&4@;VQD(&%D9')EF5D('1H870@=&AE;>2!H860@
M;6]V960L('1H870@:&4@:&%D(&YO;(&ED96;$@=VAE2!H860@;6]V
M960-"G1O+"!A;F0@=&AA;="!T:&4@<&EE8V4;@;V8@<&%P97(@=VET:"!T:&4@
M861D6]U;F<@9VER;"!O;B!T:&4@2!T:&]U9VAT('EO=2!W;W5L9"!F;W)G970N
M(@T*#0I4:&4@8V%P<&5R('1O('1H92!S=&]R>2!I2!H87!P96YE9"XN+@T*#0HM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+0T*#0I4:&4@55-$02!O;F-E('=A;G1E9"!T;R!M86ME(&-O
M=W,@<')O9'5C92!M:6QK(&9A2!A8V-I9&5N="P@86YD+"`R('EE
M87)S#0IL871E2!C86UE(&)A8VL@=VET:"!T:&4@(FYE=RP@:6UP
M2P@=&AE;>2!G;W0@82`Q)2!I;7!R;W9E;65N="!I;B!O=71P=70N#0H-
M"D9I;F%L;'DL(&EN;(&1E2!)(&QO;
M2X@($D@;65A2!C;W5L
M9"!R=6XN+BXB#0H-"E1H92!P:'ES:6-I2!A6]U(&)R;VME/R(@87-K960@=&AE;(&5N9VEN965R+B`@0G5T#0IB969O7,L(&)E='=E96X@<'5F9G,@;VX@=&AE;('!I<&4L(")F:7)S="!)
M(&%S2P@;VYE(&]F#0IT:&4@
M2!T:&4@86ER8W)A
M9G0N#0H-"DAE('-A="!D;W=N(&%T('1H92!C;VYT'!E6]N(&]N(&$@
M2!H=6YT97(L#0I(92!C
M;W5L9"!S:&]O="!T96X@87)R;W=S('5P=V%R9"P-"E-H;V]T('1H96T@=VET
M:"!S=6-H('-T2!R96=A2!F96QT(&5N=&ET;&5D#0I4;R!I
M;G-T&5D(&5X8V5E9&EN9VQY;(&EN9;&EG;F%N="P-"E1A;&ME9;"!A
M8F]U="!T:&4@;&%W(&]F(&5R&-E<'1I;VX-
M"F]F(&$@F5R;RX-"@T*(E1H:7,L(B!T:&5Y('-A
M:60L(")W87,@2!F
M;W(-"D%L;"!T:&4@87)R;W=S(&AE;(&AA9;"!W87-T960N(@T*#0I(:6%W871H
M82P@:6X@82!T96UP97(L#0I1=6]T960@<&%R=',@;V8@4BX@02X@1FES:&5R
M+`T*475O=&5D(%EA=&5S(&%N9"!Q=6]T960@1FEN;F5Y+`T*475O=&5D(')E
M86US(&]F($]S8V%R($ME;7!T:&]R;F4L#0I1=6]T960@06YD97)S;VX@86YD
M($)A;F-R;V9T#0HH<')A8W1I8V%L;'D@:6X@97AT96YS;RD-"E1R>6EN9R!T
M;R!I;7!R97-S('5P;VX@=&AE;0T*5&AA;="!W:&%T(&%C='5A;&QY;(&UA;='1E
M2!O9B!'86QO:7,L#0I';W0@82!N
M:6-E;'D@8F%L86YC960@;&%Y;W5T#0I!;F0@2!E>&-E
M<'1I;VXN#0I4:&ES;+"!)(&AA;=&4@=&\@:&%V92!T;R!S87D@:70L#0I787,@
M=&AE;('-C;W)E(&]F($AI87=A=&AA;+`T*5VAO(&%S('5S=6%L('-H;W0@:&ES;
M(&%R2!E;'-E('=A2!C;W5L9&XG;="!U;F1E2!C;W5L9&XG;="!R86ES92!O8FIE8W1I;VYS+@T**%=H:6-H(&ES;('=H
M870@7-I2!(:6%W871H80T*5V%S
M(&$@8G)I;&QI86YT;('-T871I2!(:6%W871H80T*4&5R;6%N96YT;'D@8V]G
M:71A=&EN9PT;*3VX@=&AE;(&YO;6YA;6EC(%!R;V=R86UM:6YG(B!B>2!"96QL;6%N
M(&%N9"!$7-I
M8VES="!C;VYS=6QT6]U
M+"!A;B!A;G-W97(@97AI6]U(%]M96%N7R!B>2`R("H@,B`_(@T*#0I,;V=I8VEA;CH@(E!L
M96%S92!D969I;F4@,B`J(#(@;6]R92!P2P-"B`@("`@("`@("`@('1H96X@87-K0T*
M("`@("`@("`@("!T;R!B92!A;B!A8V-O=6YT86YT+@T*#0HM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+0T*#0I/;&0@;6%T:&5M871I8VEA
M;G,@;F5V97(@9&EE.R;!T:&5Y(&IU;2!S=&]O9"!D;W=N
M(&]N('1H92!S=')E970@=VET:"!A;&P;@=&AE;:7(-"G1H:6YG&DN;#0H-"E-H
M92!L969T(&%N9"!L969T(&AI;2!T:&5R92P@97EE2!H879I;F<@8V%L;&5D#0IF;W(@
M82!T87AI+B`@4V%Y64I.@T*("T@22!T:&]U9VAT('EO=2!S86ED('1H
M97)E('=E2!C;W5N=&5D('1O
M(&YI;F4N#0H@+2!.;RP@=&AE;>2=R92!414XA#0H@+2!.;RP@8V]U;G0@=&AE;
M;3H@,"P@,2P@,BP@+BXN(@T*#0HM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+0T*#0I7:&%T)W,@;F]N+6]R:65N=&%B;&4@86YD(&QI;=F5S
M(&EN;('1H92!S96$_#0H-"DUO8FEU7!O=&AE;71H:6YG(&EN;('1H
M:7,@56YI=F5R7=A>2X@($)E2!D96)U9V=I;F<@;7D@
M4&%S8V%L('!R;V=R86US+B(-"@T*36%T:&5M871I8VEA;CH-"B`@("`@("`@
M("`@("`B1F]R9V5T(&%L;"!T:&%T(2`@2G5S="!M86ME('EO=7(@9F]R;75L
M864@87,@865S=&AE;=&EC86QL;>0T*("`@("`@("`@("`@("!P;&5A7,@=&\@=&AE;('-E8V]N9"!T:&%T('1H92!A
M=F5R86=E('!E"!C=6)E9""!C=65B9"<_("!997,L
M('1H870G"!C
M=65B9"XN+B7,@:&4@=VEL;"!A2!A9W)E
M97,N#0H-"E1H92!S96-O;F0@;6%N(&-A;&QS;(&]V97(@=&AE;('=A:71R97-S
M(&%N9"!A"!S<75A"!C=6)E9"<@
M86YD('=H:6QE('=A;&MI;F<@87=A>2P@='5R;G,-"F)A8VL@86YD('-A>7,@
M;W9E65S)W,L('-U8G1R86-T
M(&9R;VT@-C`L(&%N9"!D:79I9&4@8GD@,"XV+@T*#0HM+2TM+2TM+2TM#0H-
M"B`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@5&AE;($)A2!F;W(@;6]R
M92!T:&%N(#,P(&UI;G5T97,_#0HQ,2D@5V]R:V5D(&]N(&$@<')O8FQE;2!C
M;VYT:6YU;W5S;'D@9F]R(&UO;&-L=61E
M9"D_#0HQ."D@1&]N92!A('!R;V)L96T@3\-"C(R*2!(879E('EO=2!E
M=F5R(&EN861V97;)T96YT;'D@=V%L:V5D(&EN;('5P;VX@<&5O<&QE;(&1O:6YG
M(&$@<')O8FQE;2!S970_#0HR,RD@06YD(&IO;:6YE9"!I;B!A9G1E6]U(&5V97(@=7-E9"!F;V]D(&1O:6YG(&$@<')O8FQE
M;2!S970_#0HR-2D@1&ED;('EO=2!E870@:70@86QL/PT*,C8I($AA=F4@>6]U
M(&5V97(@:&%D(&$@9&]M97-T:6-A=&5D('!E="!O6]U6]U2!I;B!O2!O;B!A(&UA;=&@@=&5S=#\-"C4R*2!3=V%L;&]W960@979E2!O;B!A('1E2!Y;W5R('!R
M;V9E3\-"C8Y*2!(879E('EO=2!E=F5R('5N
M9&5R,"!T;R!#7S`L($)?,"P@86YD($A?,`T*
M("`@("`@("!I&%M<&QE;(&]F(&$@9V5N97)A;"!P7-I8W-?+"!V;VPN(#(I#0H-
M"@T*3F]T('!R96-I2!P=7)E+6UA=&@L(&)U="`N+BX-"@T*1G5L;&5R
M)W,@3&%W(&]F($-O2!L87)G92!A;F0@2!D969E871E9"!A;&P;@8VAA;&QE;F=E65A2P@=&AE;>2!H;W!E9"!T;R!S964@=&AA;="!S
M:&4@=V]U;&0@;F\@;&]N9V5R(&)E#0IC:&%M<&EO;B!W2!M970@86X@;W!P;VYE;G0@=&AA;="!W87,@:&5R(&5Q
M=6%L+B`@5&AE;('1W;R!S;VYS('=R97-T;&5D#0IA;F0@2!O;B!A;B!E<75A;"!F;V]T:6YG
M('=I=&@@=&AE;#0IP;W=E2!O9B!T:&4@
M=W)E6]U;F<@;65N(&AA9;"!C;&5A2!D96-I9&5D('1O(&=O('1O('1H92!B2!I;F9O7,L(")))VT@2!U<&]N(&AE;F4@:&5R('-I;F-E('-H92!I65D(&MN;W0N(@T*#0HM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+0T*#0I4:&5R92!A2`B5&AE;('=O3H-"B`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("!4:&4@=V]R;&0@
M:7,@9&EV;:61E9"!I;G1O('1W;R!C;&%S6=O;@T*($$N(%1H92!B;WD@
M:&%S(&$@2!S8VAE9'5L92!G>6T@8VQA0T*('(N(%=H>2!T:&4@9VER;"!D;V5S;B=T(')U;B!A(#0M;6EN
M=71E(&UI;&4-"B!J+B`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@
M("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@9&5C86=O;@T*#0HM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+0T*#0I?7U\@(#$N(%1H870@=VAI8V@@
M3F]A:"!B=6EL="X-"E]?7R`@,BX@06X@87)T:6-L92!F;W(@'!R97-S:6]N('1O(')E
M<')E2X-"E]?7R`Q-2X@5VAA="!Y;W4@9&\@:68@>6]U(&AA;=F4@
M>6%R;B!A;F0@;F5E9&QE;&EO;0T*0RX@:6YS8W)I8F4@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@2RX@
M8V]N90T*1"X@9V5O;65T2X-
M"@T*5VAE;B!H92!L96%V97,L(&]N92!E;F=I;F5E2!B>2!A9&1I;F6]U('=I;&P;@:&%V
M92!T;R!S:&%R90T*=&AE;(')O;VT@=VET:"!O=&AE;2!E
M;G1E2!T
M:&%T)W,@=V]N9&5R9G5L(2(@(%-A>7,@06QB97)T+B`@(E=E(&-A;B!D:7-C
M=7-S(&UA;=&AE;6%T:6-S(2(-"B)!;F0@:&5R92!I7,@06QB97)T+B`@(E=E(&-A;B!D:7-C=7-S('!H>7-I8W,A
M(@T*(D%N9"!H97)E(&ES;('EO=7(@=&AI;7,@870@=&AE;('1H96%T97(A(@T*2G5S="!T:&5N(&%N
M;W1H97(@;6%N(&UO;=F5S(&]U="!T;R!C87!T=7)E($%L8F5R="=S(&AA;F0@
M86YD('-H86ME(&ET;+@T*(DDG;2!Y;W5R(&QA;7,L(")3;RP@=VAE6]U('1H
M:6YK(&EN;=&5R97-T#0IR871E2P@=6YT:6P@;VYE(&1A>2P@:71S
M('1E86-H97)S('1R:65D('1O('1E86-H(&ET;(&%B;W5T#0IR96-T86YG=6QA
M2!D:79I9&5D(&)Y('IE
M2X-"C,N("`@("`@22!C;W5L9"!O;FQY
M(&=E="!A2!C;&]S92!T;R!M>2!T97AT8F]O:RX@($D@8V]U
M;&1N)W0-"B`@("`@("`@86-T=6%L;'D@2X-"C6]U(2`@22=L;"!D:69F97)E;G1I871E('EO=2$A(2(@(%-O
M(&5V97)Y8F]D>2!G971S('-C87)E9"!A;F0@2X@($]N;'D@
M;VYE('!E"XB#0H-"BTM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M#0H-"D$@;6%T:&5M871I8VEA;B!W96YT(&EN;6]U(2(L(&)U="!S=&EL;"!T:&4@;W1H97(@;6%N
M(&AA9;"!N;R!R96%C=&EO;BX@($9I;F%L;'DL(&EN;#0IF6]U(&QI;:V4Z($DG;2!E('1O('1H92!X+B(-"@T*+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2T-"@T*("`@+PT*("!\
M("`@,0T*("!\("TM+2TM("`](&QO9R;!C86)I;@T*("!\(&-A8FEN#0H@+PT*
M#0H@("`@("`@($]O<',L('EO=2!F;W)G;W0@>6]U2DL("!T:&5N
M('=H870@9&]E"T^,"`@>"`@("`@("`@("`@("`@
M("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@('@M/C`@>`T*#0IA;G-W97(Z("AW6]U(&1O(&UY;(&UA;=&@@9F]R(&UE;
M('1O;FEG:'0_#0I$860Z("`@($YO+"!S;VXL(&ET;('=O=6QD;B=T(&)E(')I
M9VAT+@T*4F%L<&@Z("!796QL+"!Y;W4@8V]U;&0@=')Y+@T*#0HM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+0T*#0I-2X-"@T*8&!7:&\@=V]U;&0@;&EK92;!T;R!D;R!T:&4@9FER2P@86YD('=I=&@@GDL('=H
M;R!G;W0@:70@2!T:&4-"F5N=&AU;2!S='5D96YT(&]F(&UA;=&AE;6%T:6-S('=H;PT*("`@("`@
M("`@(&ES;(&]F=&5N(&-O;F9R;VYT960@=VET:"!T97)MF5D+"!S;W5R8V4N("!4:'5S+"!W90T*("`@
M("`@("`@(&9O;&QO;=V5D('1H92!A9'9I8V4@;V8@;6%T:&5M871I8VEA;G,@
M:&%N9&5D(&1O=VX@9G)O;2!T:6UE#0H@("`@("`@("`@:6UM;W)T86PZ("`B
M5VEN9R!)="XB#0H-"@T*("`@("`@("`@($-,14%23%DZ("`@("`@("`@("`@
M22!D;VXG="!W86YT('1O('=R:71E(&1O=VX@86QL('1H92`B:6XM#0H@("`@
M("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("!B971W965N(B!S=&5P6]U(&AO;=R!T;R!D;R!T:&ES;+"!Y;W4G6]U6]U6]U<@T*("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@
M("`@("`@("`@("`@:&%N9"X-"@T*("`@("`@("`@($-(14-+(&]R($-(14-+
M($9/4B!93U524T5,1CH@5&AI;6]U
M(&-A;B!D;R!I="!O;B!Y;W5R(&]W;B!T:6UE+@T*#0H@("`@("`@("`@4TM%
M5$-(($]&($$@4%)/3T8Z("!)(&-O=6QD;B=T('9E2!A;&P;@=&AE;(&1E
M=&%I;',L('-O($DG;&P-;"B`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@
M(&)R96%K(&ET;(&1O=VX@:6YT;R!T:&4@<&%R=',@22!C;W5L9&XG;=`T*("`@
M("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@<')O=F4N#0H-"B`@("`@("`@
M("!(24Y4.B`@("`@("`@("`@("`@(%1H92!H87)D97-T(&]F('-E=F5R86P@
M<&]S2!T:&ES;
M(&ET;(&UE86YS;('1H870L#0H@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@
M("!A;F0@:68@22!S87D@=&AA;="!I="!M96%N71H:6YG(&)U="!T:&4@8V]N8VQU6]U(&-A
M;B=T('-E92`G96TN#0H-"B`@("`@("`@("!"4DE%1DQ9.B`@("`@("`@("`@
M($DG;2!R=6YN:6YG(&]U="!O9B!T:6UE+"!S;R!))VQL(&IU;&-E<'0@=&AA;="!I
M="!W;VXG="!W;W)K(&EF;('@@:7,@82!M;V]N(&]F#0H@("`@("`@("`@("`@
M("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("!*=7!I=&5R("A0;W!U;&%R(&EN;(&%P<&QI960;@
M;6%T:"!C;W5R2!P96]P;&4@:&%V92!T:&5I3L@;F%T
M=7)A;&QY;(&AE;(&%S:V5D(&EF;('1H97)E('=A6]U
M+"!!;&)E6]U('-I;7!L>2!C86XG="!C;W5N="XB#0H-
M"BTM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM#0H-"E-O;64@
M9F%M;W5S(&UA;=&AE;6%T:6-I86X@=V%S('1O(&=I=F4@82!K97EN;W1E('-P
M965C:"!A="!A#0IC;VYF97)E;F-E+B`@07-K960@9F]R(&%N(&%D=F%N8V4@
M2P@:&4@F5R2!T;R!T:&4-"F-O;F9E2!H92!S='5M
M8FQE9"!I;G1O(&-L87-S(&QA;=&4L('-A=R!S979E;B!P'0-"F-L
M87-S(')O;&QE9;"!A2!H860@2!I="!C86UE
M(&]U="!T:&%T('=H870@=&AE;('!R;V8@:&%D('=R:71T96X@;VX@=&AE;(&)O
M87)D#0IW97)E('1H92!S979E;B!M;W-T(&EM;<&]R=&%N="!U;G-O;'9E9"!P
M2!A;B!A
M8V%D96UI8R!L96=E;F0L(&%T(&QE87-T;(&%C8V]R9&EN9R;!T;R!*86X@2&%R
M;VQD#0I"0T*=6YS;VQV960@=6YD97(@
M2X-"@T*5'=O('1R86EN2!S=&%R=&EN9R;!O;B!T
M:&4@9G)O;G0@;V8-"F]N92!O9B!T:&5M(&9L:65S(&)A8VL@86YD(&9O2!T;PT*9&5A=&@N("!7:&%T(&ES;('1H92!T;W1A;"!D
M:7-T86YC92!T:&4@9FQY(&AA;2!A8W1U86QL
M>2!H:71S(&5A8V@@=')A:6X@86X@:6YF:6YI=&4@;G5M8F5R(&]F('1I;65S
M(&)E9F]R92!I=`T*9V5T2!W:71H('!E;F-I;`T*86YD('!A
M<&5R(&)Y('-U;6UI;F<@86X@:6YF:6YI=&4@('-E2!W87D-"FES(&%S(&9O;&QO;=W,Z("!3:6YC92!T:&4@
M=')A:6YS(&%R92`R,#`@;6EL97,@87!A6EN9PT*870@82!R871E(&]F(#2!S=')A;F=E+"(@6]U('-A>2!T;R!T:&5M+"!T:&5Y#0IT2!D:69F97)E;G0N#0H@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@+2T@
M2F]H86YN(%=O;&9G86YG('9O;B!';V5T:&4-"@T*+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2T-"@T*(E1H92!R96%S;VX@=&AA;="!E=F5R
M>2!M86IO7-I8VES="!W86QK(&EN;=&\@
M82!B87(N#0I9;W4G9"!T:&EN;:R!T:&4@2!A(&9A2!A2!A
M(&YE;=R!C87(N("!4:&4@;6%T:&5M871I8VEA;B!S87ES('1H97D-"G-H;W5L
M9"!S96QL('1H92!O;&0@=&ER92;!A;F0@8G5Y(&$@;F5W(&]N92X@(%1H92!C
M;VUP=71EFQE9"X@(%1H92!C;VYD=6-T;W(@8V%M92!A8F]A2!B86-K(&9R;VT@=&AE;(&-O;G9E
M;G1I;VXL('1H92!G2!A('1R=64@2P@8G5T#0II="=S(&9U;FYY
M(&%N>7=A>2XN+BX-"@T*07)O=6YD('1H92!T:6UE('=H96X@0V]L9"!787(@
M2!C;W5L9"!G970@=&AE;:7(@:&%N9',-"F]N+B`@5&AE;(&=U87)D+"!B96EN
M9R!A;B!%;F=L:7-H(&=E;G1L96UA;BP@9&ED;(&YO;="!W86YT('1O(&)E(')O
M=6=H#0IT;R!T:&4@;&%D:65S(&%N9"!Y970@;F5E9&5D('1O('-A=F4@4G5S
M2P@:&4@2$B("!4:&4@<')O9F5S6]U)VQL#0IF:6YD('1H:7,@
M:6YT97)E7-I8VES="P@86YD(&$@;6%T:&5M871I8VEA;B!F:6YD('1H96US96QV
M97,@:6X@86X-"F%N96-D;W1E+"!I;F1E960@86X@86YE8V1O=&4@<75I=&4@
M6]U(&AA;=F4@;F\-"F1O=6)T(&%LF5S('1H92!S:71U
M871I;VX@86YD('-T87)T2!T:&%T(&AE;('=A
M
Return to Top

Downloaded by WWW Programs
Byron Palmer