![]() |
![]() |
Back |
On Thu, 14 Nov 1996 14:38:55 -0800, Tom_AustinReturn to Topwrote: >Maybe it's a generational/geographical thing. I'm 35, and in all my >time in the workplaces, and all the places I've worked, Drafter and >Designer are the standard terms, even by the Old Guard guys, who are >traditionally sexist in every other way. Do you see what I mean by the baggage of our perceptions? Here we have the perception being put forward that "the Old Guard guys, who are traditionally sexist in every other way". I don't believe there is any malice involved, just that that is the perception you have. As you can see, this colours the way you see things. In the same way, those who see the three letters M, A and N used in sequence feel offended by it because they have the perception that its use somehow demeans females. Even of the letters were C, A and T, or D, O and G, a similar situation would result. Similarly there are people equally offended when the letters MAN are replaced by PERSON or something else, or the work changed entirely. We need to understand that the word is not the problem, it is simply a convenient hook to hang your coat on. When we understand this, maybe we will start to resolve things. Regards, Ian A. White, CPEng waiwhite@zip.com.au WAI Engineering Sydney 2000 Australia
I was assistant city engineer of a small midwestern town awhile back...I'll never forget a conversation I had with the (male) personnel director one time. I told him there was a better expression than "workMAN's comp"--plenty of people who worked in the city weren't men. He was absolutely bewildered--"worker's comp" had never occurred to him. Moral of story--people will sometimes go for the sexist title even when it's a more awkward locution (like "draftsman" instead of "drafter"). Carolyn Dougherty carolyn@accesscom.net "At last," cried Emerson. "Free from forges, farms and factories. How I long to write my masterpiece!" "No," said Thoreau, "let's go drinking." _Dreams_Return to Top
(Peter Skelton) writes: > I'm married to the drafting supervisor at a local plant. She flatly prefers > drafter or draftsperson but wouldn't make an issue of it, after all there > are real problems to be dealt with. > > As I want to stay married another twenty years, I'll be polite. > > Most sexism is lazyness, insensitivity or stupidity. There is a slight > possibility that your drafter considers you incorrigible in that way and > dosen't feel you're worth the emotional energy and career risk involved. But, but .... but, the word "draftsman" is just a title, meaning *one* who drafts. There is not gender associated with it at all. If one were to train a dog or cat to draft, it's still an appropriate title. Do not underestimate your abilities. That is your boss's job. It is your job to find ways around your boss's roadblocks. _______________________________________________________________ Glen Appleby glena@bbs.cruzio.com http://www2.cruzio.com/~glena/Return to Top
I use 8 micron hollow glass spheres for seeding water in PIV applications. They are sold by Potter's Ballotini in the UK. The tradename is Sphericel and they have a nominal density of 1.1 g/cc (range 0.8 to 1.4 g/cc). You can try separating them in a centrifuge or you may condsider using a glycerol and water test fluid. My (old 1992?) data sheet gives the US address as: Potters Industries Inc 20 Waterview Boulevard PArsippany NJ 07054 Tel: (201) 299-2900 Fax: (201) 335-9350 You might get better advice if you described the flow you are investigating and your proposed illumination system. I think you will have problems with particles much smaller than the size you suggest. TSI will sell you some very expensive silver coated hollow glass spheres with roughly the same mean diameter and density. I think Potters now sell something similar as a component for odd conducting polymer mixes(?) If you feel braver, the following reference gives a method for making your own silver coated particles. @ARTICLE{schmitt95a, AUTHOR = {T. Schmitt and J. N. Koster and H. Hamacher}, JOURNAL = {Meas. Sci. Technol.}, KEY = {piv}, NUMBER = {6}, PAGES = {682-689}, TITLE = {Particle design for displacement tracking velocimetry}, VOLUME = {6}, YEAR = {1995} } Cheers, Andy Mr Andrew Hind, WWW: http://www.chemeng.ed.ac.uk/people/andy/ Department of Chemical Engineering, Email: A.K.Hind@Ed.Ac.Uk Edinburgh University, The King's Buildings, Phone: +44 (0)31650 4857 Mayfield Road, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH9 3JL. Fax: +44 (0)31650 6551Return to Top
Rikard GEBARTReturn to Topwrote: (snip) >I remember reading in a Swedish newspaper many years ago of a system for houses where a salt >was used to absorb heat from the indoor air during the (warm) day. This was accomplished >by melting of the salt (phase change). During the night when the temperature decreased >the salt solidified and released its heat again to the indoor air, thereby saving some >energy for heating. I have not heard anything recently about this system so I assume >that it is not competitive to ordinary heat exchangers and similar systems which are >widely used in Sweden. It is possible that the same system could be used for engine >heating. The newspaper article probably mentioned what salt they used but I have no clue. >Its melting point has to be somewhere close to room temperature (20 degree C). Maybe a >chemist can tell you which salt would be suitable. Yes, but the "melting" point should be at about 80C and boiling higher than 120C >Finally, if you just want to have something for your own car you should definitely buy >existing equipment and not build something yourself. If you buy it in Europe the cost >of a complete solution with engine and passenger compartment heating and a timer would >probably be less than the cost of the parts only for something you build yourself (not >mentioning that the reliability and safety would be much higher). Well, I agree in general. But you have to know I'm a mechanical engineer with own design and prototyping business working for medical and automotive industrie. I guess I'd manage to calc., design and manufacture a proper heat exchanger, fill it with the apropriate liquid and mount it in a car. Moneywise I completely agree. >If, on the other hand, you want to invent something new you may have a pretty interesting >idea.... Unfortunately it's developed already :-( Only seems to be not too popular and cost/value for the user is not overwhelmingly great. I suspect there are some problems with keeping the liquid absolutely clean so it doesn't crystalize when the temperature drops but does so when I start the car. I'll do some patent research ad see how BMW and other manufacturers did it. Thanks for all the interesting replies so far, Frank
Steven VogelReturn to Topwrote: >Somehow I recall work going on at the Engineering School of Tufts >University, under Dr. Iannos Mioulis. You might contact him; they were >using lithium bromide and water. Adding water gives a lot of heat; >using engine heat after warm up can cook the water off again for the >next cycle. Lithium bromide has been used for quick-heat packages of >food as well. Lithium bromide sounds very poisonous. But when it's used in dischargable packages for food it can't be. Maybe a chemist can clearify and say something about that "stuff"? Does it change phases and can this process be initiated at a low temp so it heats up anytime? Greetings, Frank
INTERNET Some people prefear to go on thinking that the Einstein’s relativity theory is right , thinking that matter cannot reach and substain light velocity, because in this case matter would have an infinitive mass , and it would be necessary to transfer to it an infinitive quantity of energy to reach light velocity. At the same time the physics substain that at elemental material level the time does not exist and that in normal conditions it is not possible to travel in the time. As opposite to what mentioned before, the writer, after 20 years of research out of the pubblic ufficial circuit of the physical research, can prove that things are different. Some examples of his theories follows: -The conception of time and space given by Einstein Relativity is completly inconsistent applied to the case of light velocity of the matter and the time is translated by some physical, heavy consistent material particles but normally invisible. In many cases the theories substained by the physics are uncomplete or inadeguated to describe the reality, but because of their lack to give an explanation to the real phenomenons; they continue to substain that their concepts is the only truth, thing that is false in the reality. - The Writer gives some information about: 1) travels of matter at light velocity in present time, 2) the explanation of the natural composition of the elemental particles that translate the time in the matter, 3) the explanation of the forces unification, where it is explained the natural formation in the sub-elemental particles of the electricity, of the magnetism and the gravity, 4) explanation of matter at null temperature, where the quarks can be visible and free, because they are stopped in the space, expanded and enlarged 10(18 ) times or 1 billion of billions of times and they are freely visible at naked eyes for about 10 minutes and they reveal their true physical nature as physical particles. The Writer brings explanations and ascertained cases which confutate the Einstein’s relativity theory substaining that the matter can not travel at light velocity. The contrary is possible. It is given the right explanation of the whole physical world (included that the real physical structure of the space is " not "empty" , but it has a completly different structure " normally " not ascertainable "). End of December 1996 it will be ready a book , entitled "THE QUADRIDIMENTIONAL UNIVERSE", where in about 420 pages with colour photos and pictures , the writer explains these theories and many other concepts not already reached by the officials science. Shipment: per Airmail. Possible markets: All countries except for Italy , Switzerland , Japan, Cina , C.S.I. and related Countries DEPOSITED AND PROTECTED CONTENTS SINCE 1994 PLEASE REPLY FOR MORE INFOS OR TO READ FURTHER PAGES: scienza@pianeta.itReturn to Top