Subject: Possible and impossible in transmutation
From: poratmy@netvision.net.il
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 1996 19:41:35 GMT
(NAA
Results)
Atomic Atomic Per Nucleon (* ratio)
Ele Ratio A Z Mass Binding Ener Weighted B.E.
--- ------ --- --- ---------- ------------ --------------
Al 0.0051 13 27 26.98154 0.999316296 0.005096513
Ag 0.0661 47 107 106.905092 0.999113009 0.06604137
Cr 0.0594 24 52 51.940509 0.998855942 0.059332043
Fe 0.1453 26 56 55.934939 0.998838196 0.14513119
Ni 0.6231 28 58 57.935346 0.998885276 0.622405415
Cu 0.0796 29 63 62.939589 0.999041095 0.079523671
V 0.0001 23 51 50.943962 0.998901216 0.00009989
Co 0.001 27 59 58.933198 0.998867763 0.000998868
Zi 0.0204 30 64 63.929145 0.998892891 0.020377415
H 1 1 1.007825 1.007825
Average non-Ni Binding Energy 0.99920658
Delta Binding Energy (Ni's-other's) -0.000321304
Required protium / Ni nucleon ratio to balance 0.035941162
Required H/Ni atomic ratio 2.084587384
I would like to contribute something of my knowledge (Y .Porat)
about transmutation and what is 'possible' and what is 'impossible ' in
transmutation
and by that SAVE YOU ,FELLOWS SOME TIME AND ENERGY.
According to my research wich is sommed up in my book 'A model of the
Nucleus and the
Atom' The nuclei of the Periodic table may be grouped in a few groups .
The basis for that common group is a connon structure of their
'skeleton'
TRANSMUTATION IS POSSIBLE ONLY WITHIN THAT GROUP
-when I say possible I mean under "ordinary' conditions --Ordinary
does not include
for instance the 'Big Bang' conditions that I cannot claim knowing
something about it.
So ,under ordinary -even Nuclear energies :
Ni and Cu and to some extend Zn ,are a nuclear family (transmutation is
possible)
(If you know some basic chemistry it is in a way some surprise because
everybody 'knows ' that Ni belongs to the Iron family -but it is Not !
it is closer to Cuprum!)
Mg Si Al and P(otasium) are another 'closed' family
To be specific to our subject : If you start with a Ni electrode it
might be transmutated (potentially) to Cu and may be to Zn
but if you expect it to become Fe or Al or Co or Pb{!] than you may
forget about it.
i.e. by some more than the common knowlrdge of today ,many people can
save
time ,mony and resources .
How do I know all that and how can I be sure about it -you will have to
read the above book ,or at least begin with the abstract.
Therefore I join John Logajan (fusion digest No 5497) in the assumption
that all the 'Transmutated' elements of the above experiment are just
contaminations from outside resources.
Subject: What is the best source for Tritium Particles
From: margaret@beitberl.beitberl.ac.il (Porat)
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 1996 19:41:40 GMT
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_01BBC373.315C2B80
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1250
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Porat
I would like to ask one or many of the members of the list
What is the common source of Tritrium Particles used today.
I ask ,because ,I have a strange fealing ,I can contribute
something about finding a cheap source.
The same applies for Deuterium Particles.
Thanks.
------=_NextPart_000_01BBC373.315C2B80
Content-Type: text/html; charset=Windows-1250
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Porat
I would like to ask one or =
many of the members of the list
What is the common source of =
Tritrium Particles used today.
I ask ,because ,I have a strange =
fealing ,I can contribute
something about finding a cheap source. =
The same applies for Deuterium Particles.
Thanks.
------=_NextPart_000_01BBC373.315C2B80--