Newsgroup sci.physics.fusion 26968

Directory

Arthur Carlson TOK wrote:
> 
> 
> 48 orders of magnitude covers an awful lot of territory. For instance,
> the size of the universe is just a few exameters, and the time it
> takes light to cross a proton is a few yoctoseconds. But there are
>
And a dozen eggs is about 20 yoctomoles?
Mike Morrow
Dept. of Physics and Physical Oceanography
Memorial University of Newfoundland
St. John's, NF
Canada

In article <57i6lj$2ub@stratus.skypoint.net>,
   jlogajan@skypoint.com (John Logajan) wrote:
->Bob Sullivan (bsulliva@sky.net) wrote:
->: John Logajan == TB
->
->Oh brother!
->
Can we take this as an announcement of a very recent 'religious' conversion, 
brother?

Bob Sullivan (bsulliva@sky.net) wrote:
:    jlogajan@skypoint.com (John Logajan) wrote:
: ->: John Logajan == TB
: ->
: ->Oh brother!
: Can we take this as an announcement of a very recent 'religious' conversion, 
: brother?
Take it as an indication that you are so comfortable with making baseless
allegations and engaging in intellectual dishonesty that you don't even
notice when you are doing it anymore.
--
 - John Logajan -- jlogajan@skypoint.com  --  612-699-9472 -
 - 4248 Hamline Ave; Arden Hills, Minnesota (MN) 55112 USA -
 -   WWW URL = http://www.skypoint.com/members/jlogajan    -

In article <329E8C8C.320F@algonet.se> techau@algonet.se (Lars Jorgensen)
writes:
>Arthur Carlson TOK wrote:
>
>> The complete list of SI prefixes is:
>>
>> Factor  Prefix  Symbol
>> ------  ------  ------
>> 10^24   yotta   Y
>  ... (or else my newsprogram wount send it)
>> 10^-24  yocto   y
>
>I'm not a physiesist. I'm just a High School student who likes physics.
>But arent there more prefixes then that becurse we have them all in
>ower "Book of formulars" or what you would call it. Dont you need any
>smaller/larger or do u just change unit then like m/lightyears?
Usually people just resort to exponential notation.  Sometimes if
a value is used enough it gets its own name, e.g. Avogadro's number
(6.02 * 10^23).  But looking at the table above, it occurs to me
that you could say a mole of any chemical compound consists of
.602 yotta molecules.  :-)
Charlie_Gibbs@mindlink.bc.ca
If your nose runs and your feet smell, you're built umop-apisdn.

Hi Folks:
I'm building a piece of high vacuum equipment in my shop and I need some 
large latching solenoids to open and close the valves. They should have a 
holding power of at least 25 lbs. I'll buy them outright or swap. Email 
me if you know of any.
Dave Sleeter

Gloria Edith Keays  wrote in article
<57g9ev$6gq@ds2.acs.ucalgary.ca>...
> I read an article in the paper today saying the Japanese were
> sending missions (unmanned) to the moon.  Apparently, they are
> interested in mining the moon for an isotope of helium for use in
> fusion reactors.  Aren't they getting a little ahead of the game,
> or am I missing something???
> 
> thanks
> 
> rod (on his wife's account)
> 
> 
What? HE3? Huh?! What's wrong with DT? Did I miss something? Please expound.

no

|>Sources of He3 on Earth are more than adequate for any experimentation
|>with He3. It occurs in some natural gas wells.
and if you keep tritium long enough, it will decay to He3

to Robin
Patent PCT/IB96/00711
Priorite suisse no. 02 203/95-0 DU 27 juillet 1995
My patent should be available the 27 july 1997
Thanks.

                   The one Field Theory,
                 is necessary to the Person!?
   Whether the one Field Theory (OFT) Is necessary to the Person,
above(over) which great Einstein worked up to the last days? The
scientist
has left to followers a question and problem.
The spectrum of the answers on a question will be: from YES to NOT.
However in conditions of limited resources of our Planet and
activity of the Person a median of the answers is in area "YES".
We created a Method Matrixed of Systematics. A ensemble multileveled
of matrixes, represents OFT.
What you expect from practical use of the theory?
Who will answer at this two questions, will receive the summary 
of the theory.
Example of the answer:
1. Y (N)
2. I Want determine a structure of time (other your text)
Yours faithfully   L.Fylinski & R.Rynkovski
e-mail: sashaaj@hotmail.com
e-mail: sashaaj@hotmail.com

                 ATTENTION!!!
   There is a Method for the solution of fundamental problems
knowledge
at all levels of matter (and not only) from the Theory of a Field up 
to Universum (Is created as makes the One Field Theory).
          It is the Method MATRIXed of Systematics (MMS).
MMS - simplicity, beauty, perfection and practical efficiency of the
theoretical analysis of any systems and their ensembles.
MMS - this holiday of soul for the creative person.
MMS - it is a god's spark for the researcher.
MMS - unfortunately, our heavy cross.
Everyone, who can help to bear this cross, we ask to send the answers
on our e-mail: sashaaj@hotmail.com
Thank you in advanced.
Yours faithfully   L.Fylinski & R.Rynkovski
e-mail: sashaaj@hotmail.com
e-mail: sashaaj@hotmail.com