![]() |
![]() |
Back |
The tenth issue of Infinite Energy, edited by Eugene Mallove, is out, and this is my brief review of it. Physical qualities: 8" x 11", 72 pages, color cover and b&w; interior. This issue seems like a cleanup issue that mostly deals with items that appeared in the previous issue. For those who wonder what the editor was doing before CF hit the fan, he was writing books, including "The Starflight Handbook," an ad for which is on the first page. The editorial by Mallove, on page 3, was better than usual, IMO, because the editor's past tendency to get critical and call names at the various little people who oppose CF -- the Steve Joneses of the world -- was thankfully absent. The letters section was good, among which was a reprint of a very interesting post made by Lawrence Wharton to the vortex-l mailing list, regarding possible evidence for biologic transmutations in geologic history. Then come some articles about CETI and ICCF6. And for those, like me, who don't know what Japanese writing looks like, there are two pages of this gibberish thanks to the mighty pen of Jed Rothwell. Then comes several small articles regarding the AquaFuel device that was introduced to readers in the previous issue. My own opinion is that the article by Gerhard Knapp, complete with supporting calculations, hits the nail on the head: the apparent excess energy is due to the latent chemical energy in the carbon rod that is only partially combusted by the initial production of carbon monoxide. Also, as others have already pointed out on the vortex-l mailing list, AquaFuel is only a minor variation of "water gas" which has been around for many decades. Then comes an article by Harold Aspden, who likes to write about magic electric motors, on which he now holds a patent. Aspden has a nice writing style, and he puts in some interesting commentary, but personally I wouldn't bet on his motor. Then comes the "Experimenter's Corner" which features some simple transmutation experiments. Then comes the "Briefs" section, which has a number of little items, including the reported demise of the previously much-ballyhooed "Takahashi scooter" which now looks like a case of mistaken identity (Chris Tinsley, in a previous issue, identified it as apparently over-unity, based solely on his riding the magic scooter: I guess Chris underestimated how much an ordinary battery and electric motor can push his body around). So once again, with things like AquaFuel and magic motors biting the dust of truth and exposure, the only viable OU effect is CF, which remains, rightfully so, the primary focus of Infinite Energy. On the other hand, I no longer object to Mallove's tendency to let in these fringe items -- as long as they are ultimately exposed -- because it makes the magazine more interesting and more educational. After the "Briefs" section are a few more articles on miscellaneous subjects. And for me, the most interesting article is "Experimental Discovery and Investigation of the Phenomenon of Nuclear Transmutation of Isotopes in Growing Biological Cultures" by three Russians. This article focuses on a single reaction mediated by the tested bacteria: Mn^55 + d^2 = Fe^57 The whole subject of biologic transmutations is something I would like to see more coverage of in future issues, if possible. That concludes my review. For those who want a subscription (recommended for those who want to keep up with the CF field) here is the relevant info: Infinite Energy is published six times a year a 1-yr subscription is $29.95 for US and Canada, $49.95 foreign Phone: 603-228-4516, or FAX: 603-224-5975 (Visa or Mastercard) Address: Infinite Energy Magazine P.O. Box 2816 Concord, NH 03302 Kurt Johmann --Return to Top
Ignore. This is a test.Return to Top
bds@ipp-garching.mpg.de (Bruce Scott TOK ) writes: > Tritium is quite different from other radioactive materials. Even worse > than dust, it is a gas. Moreover, it is a gas that the body greedily > gulps, and it has a short half life so that once you get it you likely > get all of it. Nasty stuff. "Quite different"? "You likely get all of it"? Radon and Krypton are also gases. For the same amount of tritium inhaled, tritiated water (HTO) is much more dangerous than tritium gas, which is mostly exhaled again with the next breath. Incorporated tritium has a biological halflife of only 6 days, i.e., of the tritium that isn't exhaled immediately, half is lost within a week. Faster if you drink lots of beer. There is also a small fraction which gets bound to organic molecules, and that can stay around for months, but still far less than the radioactive halflife. I'm not saying that tritium isn't "nasty stuff" or that it's characteristics are not significantly different from those of other radiological hazards. To judge the safety of D-T fusion, simple inventories and physical properties are not, in the end, enough without detailed safety analyses. From what I've seen, I'm not (very) worried about the safety of fusion. If we can make it cheap enough, we can make it safe enough. By the way, JET long ago reached "equivalent breakeven" and will presumable demonstrate actual breakeven when they start their serious tritium phase. JT-60U will never run with tritium because it was not designed to. Q=1.05 means fusion power (which is more than the electrical power which could potentially be produced) just a tad more than heating power delivered to the plasma from outside (which is less than the electrical power delivered to the heating equipment). Since only 20% of the fusion power, the fraction carried by the alphas, stays in the plasma, most of the heating is still external. A power plant cannot afford to operate with a Q below 15 or 20 when realistic conversion efficiencies and recirculating power fractions are considered. But that only requires a triple product (n*T*tau) about a factor of five above that needed to achieve Q=1. -- To study, to finish, to publish. -- Benjamin Franklin Dr. Arthur Carlson Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics Garching, Germany carlson@ipp-garching.mpg.de http://www.rzg.mpg.de/~awc/home.html As usual, if I am caught or killed, the Institute will disavow any knowledge of my actions.Return to Top