Subject: Re: freedom of privacy & thoughts
From: caesar@copland.udel.edu (Johnny Chien-Min Yu)
Date: 19 Dec 1996 07:30:16 -0500
The Warning Letter To The Mind Control Operators
Recently, I have revealed many more mind control operators' evil
secrets including their curent crimes: to manipulate people's
healths and lives in order to eliminate their opponents, enemies and
those people whom the operators dislike. So, they can easily eliminate
any dissident or awared people (who know the existence of the mind
control surveillance system & invisible wave weapon) without attracting
the attention of the society.
Why are the most of victims never aware of being injured or
their lives being manipulated by the mind control group?!
Why are the most of victims never awared of being injured or
being manipulated their lives by the mind control operators, while
people are staying at home?!
There are some reasons below:
First reason:
Most people are not aware of the mind control surveillance system
in this society.
The mind control surveillance system is too secret to be known by
most of average citizns. Therefore, most of people will
not suspect that the authorities can spy them in their private home.
So these kinds of people will not suspect that anyone can injure them
at home.
Second reason:
Even some people know that authority has the surveillancec system
to spy people at home. However, most of them cannot imaginate that
the state of the art surveillance system can watch people's
activities at home as clearly as the movies on TV no matter day or
night (no matter the lights of people home turn on or not).
Third reason:
Most of people have no knowledge about the state of art invisible wave
weapon (so called nonlethal weapon).
Furthermore, most of people do not know that the operators can use
the advanced Tesla technology to remotely transfer the energy
(electromagnetic wave) to power the emitters of invisible wave
weapon to attack people from everythere.
Fourth reason:
Most of people do not know that the invisible wave weapon can be used
in conjuction with the state of art surveillance system to accurately
attack victim's body on any acupunture point.
Comparing with the below information, we know that using the
invisible wave weapon (so called nonlethal weapon) to attack
victims without victims' knowing is a fact.
That's because such kind of fact has been admited by our government.
This information is a report on nonlethal technologies, issued by
the Council on Foreign Relations.
(attachment)---See page 180 on _ANGELS DON'T PLAY THE HAARP_1995
by Jeane Manning & Dr. Nick Begich)
----------------------------------------------
This report points out that , "The Nairobiv Convention, to which
the United States is a signastory, prohiibits the broadcast of
electronic signals into a sovereign state without its consent in
peace time.
This report opens discussion of use of these weapons against
"terrorists" and "drug traffickers". The CFR report recommends
that this be done secretly so that the victims do not know where
the attack is from, or if there even is an attack! There is a
problem with this approach. The use of these weapons, even against
these kinds of individuals, may be in violation of United States
law in that it presume guilt rather than innocence. In other words,
the POLICE, CIA, DEA, OR OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT ORGANIZATION become
THE JUDGE, JURY AND EXCECUTIONER.
-------------------------------------------------
The above information also proves that the invisible wave weapon
are specially designed for the law enforcement to against the
terorists and durgtrafficekers by government.
It further proves that the invisible wave weapon users are also the
law enforcement officers.
However, since these career officers (or operators) can use this kind
of invisible wave weapon to attack criminals legally, they also have
chanced to use these kinds of weapon to manipulate people's lives
illegally.
I would remind you the cases which was reported in "Microwave
Harassment & Mind Control Experimentation" by Jullianne McKinney to
prove what I say is true.
(attachment)
================================================
One dividual (driven to extremes of stress by ongoing electronic
harassment focusing on her children) killed one child in an effort
to protect her from further pain.
Another individual, during a telephone conversation, was told by an
employee of a local power company that , if she value the lives of
her children, she would drop the her opposition to the company's
installation of high power lines. Since receiving that threat, the
individual 11-year-old daughter has been reduced to extrrement of
illness which cannot be diagnosed. It's now also apparent to this
invidual that her three-year-old son is on the receiving end of
externally induced auditory input.
==================================================
I would like to emphasize some important point for those readers
who think that the above examples are unusual cases and other
people would not be subjected to similar harassment.
The two families in this example are average law abiding citizens
and living in their own home. Even under such kind circumstances,
these members of these two families cannot avoid of being spied on.
So, the children of these two families cannot avoid being attacked
and harm by remotely controlled invisible wave weapons (even in the
security of their own home or staying at hospitals).
It proves the invisible wave weapon has been used in conjuction with
the surveilliance system. Also, both systems can track or attack any
of the member of these two families with incredible accuracy. From
these cases, we know that anyone of us can be also injured or examined
in our own home or any public building (including cars -- I would
emphsize it).
Fifth reason:
While the operators are using the invisible weapons to manipulate
people's live on low settings, the victims might only feel as if he or
she is stung by a bee or itch after being attacked.
To avoid the victims from becoming suspcious and awared of being
injured, the operators usually use chronal gun (bullets) which can
quickly penetrate victims' bodies and cause injury. It can be
used to target acupuncture points, any vital organ such as the heart,
liver, kidney, etc.) without generating obvious pain on the victims.
That's why the operators alway try to manipulate people's lives at
night after their targets (the people) have fallen asleep.
At the same time, as the victims are being injured, the operators
will also use the mind control surveillance system to read the
victims' minds.
Therefore, the operators can check if the victims have been awakened
or is awared of being injured. In addition, it is also used to
monitor if the operators were successful at injuring the people (to
induce the an illness).
Now, I would like to further clearify my words that human mind can be
read by mind control operators.
Reading people's mind has been achieved for a long time.
That's because I have handled the Taiwan' military classified
documrent which had pointed that Taiwan purchased the mind machine
from US (it was called the psychological language machine in Taiwan.
It means the machine can read people's mind) in 1984.
The _RADIO FREQUENCY DOSIMETRY HANDBOOK_ published by U.S. Air
Force in 1986 has proven that reading human mind is not the
problem and they just want to increase the speed of mind reading
in order to know a target's reaction while this target is being
input with subliminal message (see detail on page 189, _ANGELS
DON'T PLAY THIS HAARP_ by Jeane Manning & Dr. Nick Begich).
If the local mind control central stations (in city or county)
operate at same time, the operators indeed can track any target
24 hours a day. Most of time, they can read the target's thoughts
no matter the target is at home or driving a car (I emphasize that
the operators can read driver's mind in car, boat, or even plane
because the orginal national survreilliance system program of 1971
was supposed to "wire" the house, car, boat, etc ). However, while
the target is moving very fast on foot in the shopping canter or
shpopping mall, the operators cannot read target's thoughts.
Furthermore,In January 1991 the University of Arizona, the civilian
scientist, Dr. Stuart Hameroff, also point out that" the seat of
consciousness may be located in "computer-like cytoskeletal
polymers within living cells. " Phrased more simply; an individual's
consciousness may be located whin microscopic structures appear to
communicate via "coherent nanosecond excitations", that is, some form
of ultra-short wavelengh energy coupling. Hameroff goes to say,
"An idea expresssed relevant to life "beyond 2000", was that the brain
cytoskeletal proteins could be prepared in an artificial enviorment
which may be capable of vcontaining congnitive function."
"An individual may be able to transfer his own consciousness to an
artificial enviorment when their body approached expiration."
( "MIND CONTROL TECHNIQUES AND TACTICS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER" by
Glenn Krawczyk-- see NEXUS new times on January 93 on page 26-27 )
The above words tell us that civilian scientist also prove human
thoughts (consciousness) can be used the technique to remove or
store in an artificial enviiormnent ( and can transfer to another body).
The classified research of mind control in CIA has been over 30 years.
We believe that the CIA should have achieved the goal which using VLF
(VERY LOW FREQUENCY) to creat the artificial enviorment (such as focus
a small VLF field on target or even creat a big artificial enviorment
for people) to remove (detect) people's thoughts and read any target's
mind for a long time.
So it means that the operators have two way to read people's mind.
The original one is to collect the target's brain waves and send into
the CPU (computer). The computer wil then translate these collected
brain waves into words according to the human brain wave pattern
program.
The advanced one is to creat the artificial enviorment to remove
( or store) the target's thoughts to enviormants, then use the
power beming system patent remotely send this "removed thoughts"
as the energy into an operator's brain to directly read people's
thoughts.
Therefore, by using the brain surveillance system, the operators
can manipulate people's lives, health with the invisible wave
weapon and avoid their crimes (of manipulating people's lives
and slowly eliminating their enemies) from being discovered.
To avoid the victims from becoming suspcious and awared of being
injured, the operators usually use chronal gun (bullets) which can
quickly penetrate victims' bodies and cause injury. It can be used to
target acupuncture points, any vital organ such as the heart, liver,
kidney, etc.) without generating obvious pain on the victims. That's
why the operators alway try to manipulate people's lives at night after
their targets (the people) have fallen asleep.
At the same time, as the victims are being injured, the operators will
also use the mind control surveillance system to read the victims' minds.
Therefore, the operators can check if the victims have been awakened or is
awared of being injured. In addition, it is also used to monitor if the
operators were successful at injuring the people (to induce the an
illness).
Therefore, the operators can manipulate people's lives, health with
the invisible wave weapon and avoid their crimes (of manipulating
people's lives and slowly eliminating their enemies) from being
discovered.
In the mind control surveillance system, the ability to manipulate
people's lives without victims' knowledge is the most important
qualification for being a career (or undercover) mind control
operator.
That's because the operators must be to handle all the people
whom are being kept under their close surveillance and control and
without making them suspicious.
With this ability to manipulate people's lives, the operators can
achieve their ultimate goal of keeping people's behaviors well under
their control and elminate those whom the operators dislike or cannot
control.
That's why only a few people dare to oppose the mind control
operators in curent society because most of opponents have been
eliminated (by inducing illness or hear attack") or surpressed by the
operators with the invisible wave weapon in last two decades.
Thus, eventually, the only people who are still alive are those
people who are not aware of this mind control surveillance system or
the loyal subjects of the mind control operators. However, the most evil
in this mind control surveillance system is that the operators judge
everything with their own will but not according to the law.
So, some criminals might allow to live normally because the operators
can control them well, and some law abiding citizens might not
allow to live normally becasuse they against the interests of mind
control opertors (or some law abiding citizens are being injured
because the operators dislike them).
Since US learned the mind control technology from Russia, the
philosophy of the mind control operators has also inherit the
philosophy of Communism (Materialism & Atheism).
Therefore, these operators are carrying out the social revolution on
the U.S. society with the Communism ideology (Materialism & Atheism).
They don't believe that our Constitutoion, Law, religion or moral
values can regulate people's behaviors. In addition, they are
completely atheist and do not believe in anything other than the powers
that they hold in their hands. However, they do believe that they can
use the mind control technology to change people's behaviors.
They are controlling people's live with the invisible wave weapon
because they share a same belief in the evil philosophy of
Communism (Stalin and Mao)--The regime's power come frome the nozzle
of the gun.
Absolutely power corrupts absolutely, since the career officers
(operators) can manipulate people's lives, these career officers
(operators) have become the real controllers of people instead of
the position of public servants.
After they can manipulate people's lives (and health) without people's
knowledge (so the opertors commit crimes without being held by law),
the operators believe that "they are equal to God" because they can also
change people's fate with the invisible wave weapon..
Since these career officers (operators) hold so unbelieveble power
they have tasted and enjoyed these privileges (which is to spy on
everyone and manipulate people's lives). To protect their
privileges, the operators will get rid of anyone who is aware of their
secrets.
The most evil is that these law enforcement officers (or operaytors)
will be the judge, jury, and executioner at same time while they use
the invisible wave weapon to manipulate people's lives.
Therefore, these career officers have become the most poweerful persons
and their real powers are bigger than any elected offices.
The career officers (and agents) in security system have become the
only 'elite group" to control our society. Their powers have supassed
the elected officers becauuse the elected oficers can only stay at
their positions in limited time (term).
However these career officers (and undercover agents) will maintain
their positions in the government and the positions of mind
control operator (who can manipulate people's lives) until retirement.
Therefore, if any elected officer try to limite these career officers'
(operators') power, these career officers (operators) will take
the revenge on this elected officer after the elected officer leave his
position.
And that's why even our President or Congress members cannot regulate
these career officers (operators).
While these mind control group pursue their interests, they will
disregard the interests of our country and people.
Recently, I have written the article of "How could operators use the
invisible wave weapon to manipulate people's lives?" and "The problem
of Olmypic Central Park Explosion & The victims' Suspicous Toward the
Okolahoma City Bombing" to expose such kind of conspiracy which might be
caused by the mind control operators.
By informing the people of such kinds of facts, I have frequently
angered the mind control operators, and they are eagerly trying to get
rid of me.
This time, they secretly use the chronal gun and infrasound
weapons attack my brain and try to damdge my brain.
Although they didn't succeed, it has proven that they are trying to
kill anyone who know of their secrets and expose their corruption.
They will use such kind of violence to suppress any of their
opponents or anyone whom they dislike. Some career operators openly use
the governmental officer's title to threaten me on internet and mislead
people in order to pursue their own interests.
This time although they use the more polite title ""a friend" to notice
me, hoewever, it is still a threatened letter.
That's because I was attacked at night (12/18/96) with the invisible wave
weapon (chronal gun and infrasound) by the operators after I openly refuse
to stopping my post on Internet.
I would show readers this letter below.
(attachment)
==================================================
From user@jejpu.com Wed Dec 18 15:56:00 EST 1996
Article: 180921 of alt.conspiracy
From: user@jejpu.com
Subject: Re: freedom of privacy & thoughts
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 1996 13:10:47 GMT
Organization: Softdisk Publishing
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.1/32.230
caesar@copland.udel.edu (Yu) WROTE:
>>Why Is Mind Control Also the Lives Control?
>>(Part Nine)
>>"Why Has The mind control syatem Been Used As the Invisible
>>Martial Law?"
>I SEE THAT YOU ARE STILL POSTING, MR. ALAN YU. I THINK THAT IT WOULD
>BE A GOOD IDEA IF YOU STOPPED POSTING NOW. IT IS A GOOD IDEA TO STOP
>POSTING. A VERY GOOD IDEA. STOP POSTING NOW. NEVER POST AGAIN. IT
>IS A GOOD IDEA TO NEVER POST AGAIN.
Dear Readers,
I believe that this is a threat from a mind control operator or
cooperator.
>I AM SURE THAT YOU UNDERSTAND.
I only know that the Taiwan's operators are cooperating with the
local mind controil operators of US and have secrely attacked me with
the invisible wave weapon (chronal gun or infrasound) many times.
That's because I have exposed the most secrets of mind control
technologies.
Therefore, these operstors are trying to force me to stop my posting.
However, I believe that I know the most secrets of mind control technology
and the evil actions, philosophy of these operators.
These operators cannot debate with me on internet because their theory are
poor, also they cannot cheat me.
>NEVER POST AGAIN. YES, THIS IS A GOOD IDEA. YOU WILL NEVER POST
>AGAIN. NEVER AGAIN. YOU WILL RETIRE TO YOUR HOME AND LIVE A HAPPY
>QUIET LIFE AND MAKE NO MORE TROUBLE.
If it is a threat, then I believe that the mind control operatotrs
try to use the invisible wave weapo˷Vrf&n to injure my brain in order
to force me keeping quite to their secrets.t"U
>YOU WILL MAKE NO MORE TROUBLE.
>YOU WILL CEASE POSTING AND RETIRE TO YOUR HOME AND ALL WILL BE GRAND.
>THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME, MR ALAN YU.
I will keep posting my articles unless these operators stop their crime.
Especially, if the operators try to use their invisible wave weapon to
force me to stop my posting the truth (facts), I rather fight with them
(or die in the battle field).
>A FRIEND
I don' t have any friend who try to threaten me.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alan Yu
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
==================================================
If the mind control group succeed they will destroy the free and
democratic society that so many Americans have fought so hard to build.
This is because the philsophies and behaviors of these operators are
totally opposite with the founding principles of the United States
and the current constitution.
To avoid these groups from secretly destroy the founding principle of
United States and the freed and democratic system or even betray our
Constitution, We must request every governmental officer and especially
the law enforcement officers to follow the Constitution and Law while they
are carrying out their duties.
Since people's lives are not in their's own hands but in the
operators' hands, our freedom, democracy, wealth and political
power are only the illusion.
Our President and Congress members must stop these career oifficers
(operators) use the invisible wave weapon on our law abiding citizens.
In God's name, I tell the facts & truth with my best knowledge.
I will be responsible for my words to God because it is true.
Signed,
Alan Yu 12/19/96
Subject: Re: Revisionist SR and GR
From: odessey2@ix.netcom.com(Allen Meisner)
Date: 19 Dec 1996 13:02:05 GMT
In <59af7l$ipd@sjx-ixn9.ix.netcom.com> odessey2@ix.netcom.com(Allen
Meisner) writes:
>
>In <597n67$181@dfw-ixnews10.ix.netcom.com>
odessey2@ix.netcom.com(Allen
>Meisner) writes:
>>
>> Please bear with me in this article because I am not a
>>mathematician. Could Einstien's thought experiments be reevaluated in
>>light of a theory which suggests that light is bent by velocity? What
>I
>>mean is this: It seems that the basic equation for both SR and GR is:
>>x^2+y^2+z^2=ct^2. Could another parameter be substituted for the ct^2
>>term? For example, if you substitute a length contraction parameter
>for
>>the ct^2 time dilation parameter, would the equation still be
>>consistent with observations?
>>
>>Edward Meisner
>
> The reason I am writing this is because Einstein's equations are
>fundamenatally at odds with the inertial theory. In Mr. Hinson's
>thought experiment, he says that if you are traveling in a spaceship
at
>5c and shine a light straight up, the observer in the spacehip will
>see the light go straight up, and the stationary observer will see the
>light go diagonally forward. If I am correct and light does not have
>inertia, then the observer in the ship will see the light go
diagonally
>back and the stationary observer will see the light go straight up.
>Therefore one can define inertia as a bending of space. Mr Hillman, in
>another posting, states that the contours of inertia describe a
>Lobachevsky geometry. However, you can't use Einstein's formula
because
>it is based on the faulty model of Mr. Hinson. According to that
model,
>the light travels a longer distance for the stationary observer, than
>for the observer in the spaceship and therefore time slowed for the
>observer in the ship. In the inertial theory, exactly the opposite is
>the case. Therefore time dilation can not be the cause of the inertial
>geometry. However, the equations are nevertheless correct. The only
way
>to resolve this dillema is by positing another explanation for the
>Lobachevsky geometry. It seems that the only way to do this is by
>assuming length contraction and absolute time. However. I am not sure
>about this. Would there be any other explanation?
>
>Edward Meisner
>
> If length contraction and expansion and absolute time are assumed
then the ct^2 time dilation parameter becomes a length dilation
parameter. The speed of light will therefore vary relative to observers
moving at different speeds. This is in agreement with what the theory
predicts. For example, absolute velocity can now be determined. In the
example above, the absolute velocity is .5c. Say the spaceship is 1
lightsecond long and the observer is in the middle of the ship. He
shines a light in the direction that the ship is traveling. The length
dilation formula is exactly the same as Einstein's formula for time
dilation-sqrt(1-v^2/c^2). Substituting .5c for v, we get a length
contraction of .5. The speed of light in the term ct^2 then becomes
5c, which is the speed of the light relative to the observer in the
ship, as the theory predicts. To the observer at absolute rest the
speed of light is still c, since substituting 0 for v in the length
dilation formula gives 1. However time is now absolute and the same for
all observers. In order to determine the time it takes for the light to
hit the front of the ship, we use the train method. The absolute speed
of the ship is .5c. The distance from the middle of the ship to the
front end is .5 lightseconds. Setting the speed of light to 1, the time
that it takes for the light to hit the front of the ship for the
stationary observer is:
ct= .5t+.5
t=.5t+.5
.5t=.5
t=1 second
The distance for the stationary observer is therefore c x t= 1
light second. The observer in the spaceship sees the light travel only
the distance from the middle of the ship to the front end. However,
from the length dilation formula, he calculates .5c for the velcoity of
light relative to himself. The time it takes for the light to hit the
front of the ship for this observer is therefore just
.5t=.5
t=1
The distance for this observer is therefore .5 light seconds.
Therefore we see that for the stationary observer the length has
doubled. However, for the observer in the spaceship the length has
remained the same. Therefore although the isotropy of space has been
sacrificed, the isotropy of time has been saved, since the time that
the light took to travel the different distances is the same.
Now let's do the calculation for the situation in which the light
is shined in the opposite direction. For the stationary observer, the
lenght dilation is zero and the speed of light is c. The time it takes
for the light to hit the back of the ship is therefore:
ct+.5t=.5
1.5t=.5
t=1/3 seconds
The observer in the ship calculates the length dilation,
substituting 1.5c for v in sqrt(1-v^2/c^2). The distance is dilated by
a factor of 1.5 and therefore the velocity of light is 1.5c relative to
himself. He only sees the light travel the distance from the middle of
the ship to the back end. The time it takes for the light to hit the
back of the ship is therefore :
1.5ct=.5
1.5t=.5
t=1/3 seconds
The stationary observer sees the light travel a distance 1/3 x c=
1/3 light seconds. The observer in the ship sees sees the light travel
a distance 1.5c x 1/3 = .5 light seconds. So for the observer in the
ship everything is normal, just as in special relativity. However, the
stationary observer sees the length of the forward part of the ship as
expanded and the rearward part of the ship as contracted. The magnitude
and proportions of this distortion depends on the velocity of the ship.
Once again the isotropy of space is sacrificed but the isotropy of time
is saved, since it took the light the same time to travel the different
distances.
As we have shown, the ct^2 term in general relativity is therefore
a length dilation parameter, instead of a time dilation parameter.
However, the equations are exactly the same, so although these
different interpretations predict different things, the crucial
predictions of the spatial geometries are the same. More correctly,
this theory predicts a space geometry alone, while Einstein's theory
predicts a spacetime geometry.
Edward Meisner
Subject: Re: Vietmath War: Ian Stewart, how much money does he make?
From: Archimedes.Plutonium@dartmouth.edu (Archimedes Plutonium)
Date: 19 Dec 1996 05:20:27 GMT
In article <5990ct$777@sleepy.inch.com>
jmcgowan@metric.inch.com (John McGowan) writes:
> Well.. they do for Ian Note that one can state FLT as "there are no
> non-trivial rational solutions to x^n+y^n=z^n for n>2" and I will simply
> state that CBR(2) (cuberoot) clearly "makes sense" and is therefore a
> "rational" (makes sense) number, as is CBR(6) and so
> CBR(2)^3+CBR(6)^3=2^3... aha! I have demolished FLT and should be
> published except that Ian does not quite own all of NEW SCIENTIST as
> recognized!
>
> Of course, what I did was note that there are approximate solutions in the
> rationals (standard norm) and simply completed the rationals (to the
> reals) to get to a solution. If one wants to avoid fractions, one can note
> that there are approximate solutions in the integers (in, say, the 5-adic
> norm) and note that one can complete the integers in this norm to get a
> solution. If I did the completion of the rationals (to the reals) to get a
> counter example, it would be obvious what I did (and would be a joke).
> Completing the integers (in a p-adic norm) is not so well known and hides
> the fact that it is just a simple trick.
>
> None the less, Stewart is adamant that just as Hsiang Kepler packing
> problem (but has not redefined "rational" to mean "real"), diophantine
> analysis must go beyond integers to adics (there are folks who study
> p-adics, but not for diophantine analysis! -- heck, most if not all
> diophantine/integral equations have approximate --in a p-adic norm--
> solutions and completions of the integers to the adics like the rationals
> to the reals would show they have solutions... it would make determining
> whether or not solutions exist rather trivial... just find approximate
> ones as one solves equations in the reals by finding a sequence of
> approximations) and insists that they must follow his new definition of
> integer as adics... so please tell us Ian, since you are the biggest writer
> of math articles in all the world, tell us how much you gross in income
> and are you about to own majority shares of NEW SCIENTIST. I love how
> you fill up every article with some Penrose tiles. I think Roger is sick
> of Penrose tiles but you seem to feel that the world cannot get enough
> of those tilings.
John, that is funny, while reading your profound analysis of Ian
Stewart, I was reminded of the fact that Ian published his version of
Euclid's Infinitude of Primes in one of his books, and by gosh by
golly, Ian gave an invalid proof. I mean, here is a guy who has his
name plastered on thousands of published math reports and the man
cannot even do a valid proof of Euclid's Infinitude of Primes.
Of course, reading your above post John, he would fail miserably at
giving a valid proof of Euclid's infinitude of primes. Why, you would
just copy someone elses and pretend it was yours.
Subject: Vietmath War: Andre Weil, and allies
From: Archimedes.Plutonium@dartmouth.edu (Archimedes Plutonium)
Date: 19 Dec 1996 06:04:09 GMT
In article <32B7E9A0.41C67EA6@clipper.ens.fr>
David Madore writes:
> Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>
> > I thought you were sticking with Andrew Wiles, there, Barry? Or have
> > you come to commonsense and joined Andre' Weil who knows Wiles FLT is a
> > fake?
>
> Andr\'e Weil knows FLT is a fake? Now that's a very interesting
> notion.
> I also wonder how *you* should know that? Did you come up to him and ask
> him? Or did he ever state the fact publicly? Or are you reading his mind
> in some mystical way? Now perhaps you believe you're the reincarnation
> of Andr\'e Weil - in that case, I have bad news for you: he's not dead
> yet.
Don't even hint of nonlife on the Net. Your enemies will say you made
a threat.
I don't have time to give a broad historical cultural history of the
antagonisms between Britain, France, Germany and the US.
It was seen in the Leibniz and Newton case. It never really surfaced
with the Galois and Gauss case, but if the French had been more
rational at that time, Paris would have become the math capital of
Europe. Gauss in the distant future will be remember more for his
physics than any of his math. Gauss did nothing big in math, except for
stealing the noneuclidean geometries from Bolyai and Lobachevsky.
But as far as math rivalry with France and Britain, Britain was never
really in the big leagues. The French have been the cultural custodians
of mathematics since Napoleon who was a mathematician himself.
Much of the fanfare of the Wiles FLT is the cultural subconscious
dance that Wiles is British and that FLT is a French originated
problem. The US has never been on the mathematics world map, it is
still a backwater frontier of mathematics.
The recent news of Wiles FLT and his pilgrammage to Cambridge, then
his Wolf prize which the British in cohorts with the Israelis made
happen. The US mathematicians are just happy to see some of their minor
league players get some attention such as Barry Mazur, Ken Ribet and a
few at Ohio State. As long as the publicity and attention come their
way they will play the game.
The British that know math, know that Wiles alleged FLT is weak in
many spots, in fact he never really bridged his gap of 1993, he just
changed methods and is banking on a changed method to mask his 1993
gap. The French know this. The Germans are half and half, halB und
HalB. The Germans always consult the French on mathematics for they
know, having lived so close to the French, that their math acumen as a
collective whole is superior to the German collection. Rumors have gone
out of France into the Germans ears and it has knocked the wind out of
their sails. Gerd Faltings is a German pimp and traitor having lived in
Princeton and picked up the loose habits of undisciplined US math
people like John Conway, a British traitor and spy for the left.
This brings us back to Paris France and Andre Weil. Whose picture is
in
--- Halmos's I Have A Photographic Memory ---
236-237
Andre' Weil
This is as good a place as any to insert the picture of one who has
often been named a candidate for the world's greatest living
mathematician. Despite the breadth of his knowledge and the power of
his creativity, he has been fiercely competitive most of his life. Many
fear his aggressive sharp tongue, but some, notably his few students,
remember only his kind helpfulness. As a lecturer he can be as
difficult as his mathematics. In one course on algebraic geometry,
after a brave auditor complained that Weil didn't write enough on the
board, and, in particular, that he didn't draw any pictures, Weil
resolved to mend his ways. He strode into the room the next time,
picked up the chalk, hit its point sharply against the board once,
began: "Let P be a point in the plane...", and spent all the rest of
the hour lecturing, with the otherwise empty board, about the point P.
--- end quoting from book ---
Wiles FLT is so weak that he had to get the BBC to make a TV
documentary. Of course Andre Weil was not mentioned in the program.
Instead outside cheerleaders who had no role in Wiles FLT, such as John
Conway or other cheerleaders were given coverage.
The reason Weil was not in that TV show is because Weil knows that
the Wiles FLT is flawed and that Wiles is just trumpeting up a
publicity stunt to enshrine his fake proof.
Soon it will be Britain against France where the Brits are going to
say that Wiles FLT is correct and the French, the guardians of
mathematics are going to point out Wiles still unpatched gaps. When
this showtime flairs up, the US math people are going to be a nuisance,
and the Germans , for some other reasons except math will stay out of
the fight.
Notice how the Fields medals were awarded to three Frenchmen. Those
men deserved it, but according to the Brits and US, their news had
words to the effect "unexciting". Why? Because the math world knows
that the French are the guardians of mathematics, and that the British
with their US allies are reckless pushers of mathematics.
Andre Weil was omitted from that TV program because Andre knows
Wiles alleged FLT is not a proof.
Subject: other GALAXIES
From: raven@david.silesia.pik-net.pl (Grzegorz Kruk Ph.D.)
Date: 19 Dec 1996 17:17:10 GMT
Just for Goodbye prior to unsubscribing for a while.
In addition to my previous published here texts.
The Lorenz transformation and relativity theory give proper results in
CERN because they concern what we can observe and measure.
They do not say anything about intergalaxial travels being impossible within
human's life when the rest frame is in the middle of the travelling space-ship.
I wish you Happy New Year 1997.
GK
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
To those who were frequently asking me who I was I am available for employment
and my CV follows:
ADDRESS:
Grzegorz Kruk, Ph.D.
Wysoka 12A/146
41-200 Sosnowiec
Poland (please register mail)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
or ph./fax/modem (2400-8-N-1) +48 32 1995546
EDUCATION:
Ph.D.
13th of December 1993, graduated from Trinity
College, University of Dublin, Ireland.
Thesis: FT Infrared Spectroscopy of Liquid Crystals.
Papers:
A. Kocot, R. Wrzalik, G. Kruk, J.K. Vij, Molecular Materials, v.1,
p.273-279, (1992).
A. Kocot, G. Kruk, R. Wrzalik, J.K. Vij, Liquid Crystals, v.12, n.6,
p.1005-1012, (1992).
J.K. Vij, A. Kocot, G.Kruk, R. Wrzalik, R. Zental, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst.,
v. 14, p. 337-350, (1993).
G. Kruk, A. Kocot, R. Wrzalik, J.K. Vij, O. Karthaus, H. Ringsdorf, Liquid
Crystals, v.14, n.3, p.807-820, (1993).
G. Kruk, J.K. Vij, O. Karthaus, H. Ringsdorf, Supramolecular Science, v.2,
p.51-58, (1995).
6th of July 1989, graduated from Silesian University, Katowice, Poland,
(specialization: experimental and applications of physics).
Degree of Magistri (Master) in Physics.
M.Sc. Graduation Exam: "A"
Total Grade Point Average "B" (4.0)
Thesis: Strong Thermal Lens Induced by Laser Light in Mixtures of
Organic Liquids with Ferrocene.
Published in Berichte der Bunsenges. Phys. Chem., v.94, p.417-420, (1990)
by G. Kruk and Z. Gburski.
INTERNATIONAL MEETINGS:
Internal EC SCI*0291 project meeting, 1990, University of Dublin, Ireland.
14th International Liquid Crystal Conference, 1991, Pisa, Italy,
(Presented 2 posters).
Internal EC SCI*0291 project meeting, 1992, University of Manchester,
U.K., (Seminar).
WORK EXPERIENCE
1988-1994 physicist, Silesian University, Katowice, Poland.
Duties:
1) preparing and explaining basic experiments on physics for
undergraduate students.
2) writing computer programmes for experiments
3) designing and performance supervising of new experimental
setups for experiments within undergraduate course
5) supervising maintenance jobs on experimental hardware
6) assembling electronic hardware for experiments like e.g.
interfaces for meters and also writing software in ASSEMBLER
1989-1990 part time teacher of programming in PASCAL and BASIC, III Liceum
Ogolnoksztalcace im. A. Mickiewicza, Katowice, Poland.
Duties:
1) Installing software
2) Teaching programming in Pascal and Basic and also how to
run and operate other applications
1991-1993 research student, EEE Department, Trinity College, University of
Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. (working for EC research project SCI*0291
in cooperation with groups of University of Mainz and University of
Manchester).
Duties:
1) Laboratory research on liquid crystals and discotic liquid
crystals using FTIR spectroscopy equipment and polarizing
microscopy including:
a) FTIR Spectrometer BIO-RAD FTS60A a Motorola 68000 based
system with IDRIS operating system
b) Programmable Intelligent Temperature Controller
Oxford ITC4
2) Writing software applications for data handling in FORTRAN
3) Data handling and plotting on VAX/VMS (MATLAB), UNIX, DOS
(EASYPLOT, WORD, LOTUS MANUSCRIPT)
4) Preparing seminars for internal project meetings and conferences
5) Correcting tutorials
03.1994 - Owner of "RAVEN" -Translation & Interpreting Services Bureau.
Cooperating with:
East Europen Business Centre, Welling, London, Kent
International Language Engineering, Boulder, CO, USA (signed
contract)
Duties:
1) Manager
2) Accountant
3) Translator
4) Writing and modifying own software for accountancy
PROGRAMMING: PASCAL, FORTRAN, C
EXPERIENCE WITH OPERATING SYSTEMS: VMS, UNIX, DOS, RSX-11, CP/M, TOS,
LANGUAGES: English-fluent, Polish-native.
OTHER SKILLS: driving licence, yacht steersman licence
INTERESTED IN: programming, robotics, computer simulations, AI,
optical computing, OB, optical transistor, space research.
OTHER FIELDS OF INTEREST: sailing, skiing, sport driving, basketball, swimming,
movies, chess.
already 33 y.o., married, 2 children.
REFERENCES:
Prof. H. Robinson-Hammerstein, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
ph. +353-1-7021045
Prof. J.K. Vij, EEE Department, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland.
ph. +353-1-7021431
Subject: Re: Should a theory explain why?
From: mmcirvin@world.std.com (Matt McIrvin)
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 18:05:29 GMT
In article <591clo$n8d@agate.berkeley.edu>, Ben Thomas Galehouse
wrote:
> However,
> Newton's law's of mechanics are still, and probably always will be,
> used to explain why a multitude of effects occur. Lagrangian
> mechanics are arguably derived from a simpler statement, but that
> statement doesn't have the same feel of comprehensibility, so it
> generally isn't presented as an explanation why. Lagrangian mechanics
> isn't the origin of the phenomenon as the physicist thinks about it,
> so it isn't a good explanation why.
I think you're on to something here; things feel more like "reasons
why" if they seem more simple and elegant, though at heart that is
probably not a terribly objective criterion.
Your example is interesting. It's true that a Lagrangian derivation of
Newtonian mechanics, while it might involve fewer postulates, somehow
*feels* more esoteric and complicated than Newton's original laws. However,
when one examines more complicated theories, particularly field theories,
the Lagrangian approach becomes more and more attractive. To me, the
threshold is somewhere in the vicinity of Maxwell's equations; everything
more complicated looks nicer when expressed in a Lagrangian way than in any
other way.
The Lagrangian formalism of general relativity, in particular, is
wonderfully elegant in its basic premises, compared to starting from
Einstein's field equation. Indeed, to me it's so elegant that I consider it
as much of a "reason why" as Newton's laws. Spacetime evolves in the
absence of matter so as to extremize an action obtained, more or less, by
summing up the Gaussian curvature over spacetime. Other matter fields'
interactions come from just plugging curved-spacetime generalizations of
Lagrangians we already know and love into the same equation! There are
complications, but the fact that the basic principle can be stated in two
fairly simple sentences strikes me as just amazing.
> Is being simplified enough to explain why a good thing in a theory?
> Good or not, it is and always will be looked for in new theories. I
> have yet to hear somebody dispute Occam's Razor as a tool for
> identifying useful theories.
People (particularly grand-conspiracy theorists) actually dispute it fairly
often, but they tend to have little luck promoting their objections. One
could justify it on the basis of common sense, but a lot of things violate
common sense.
Objectors to the Razor tend to argue that the simplest theory is often
wrong. That is true, but it completely misses the point. The best
justification of this principle I can think of is that it *facilitates* the
conduct of science as a self-correcting enterprise.
Suppose we assume that two theories explaining the same body of data, one
of which clearly contains more theoretical entities than the other, are
equally likely to be correct. Simpler theories still possess two distinct
advantages in this case.
First, they often make more definite, testable predictions than more
complex theories about data *not yet* obtained. (Indeed, scientists often
speak more of "predictive power" than of simplicity.) That means that the
simpler theory is easier to test, and if the predictions are borne out, it
is likely to imply a broader and more useful range of statements about the
world.
Second, suppose that a counterexample to a theory is found. Then the effort
of modifying the theory to accomodate the counterexample is usually more
enlightening, the simpler the theory is to begin with. We end up knowing
more about limiting cases of the broadened theory. If the more complex
theory (or some other theory entirely) ends up being the right one all
along, then the theoretical apparatus developed to study the simpler theory
will still be useful to describe simply the limit in which it still holds.
This can be of great practical value.
--
Matt McIrvin
Subject: free chem software list
From: xu
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 16:45:03 -0800
http://www.umass.edu/microbio/rasmol/othersof.htm
Free Molecular Visualization Software
Other than RasMol
Chemscape Chime from MDL Information Systems, Inc., allows rotating
a
molecular image within a Netscape page. Multiple molecules can be
displayed
within a single web page, unlike helper applications (such as
RasMol) which
display each molecule in a separate window. Chime also supports
scripts
(using a superset of the RasMol scripting language). See the UMass
Chime
Resources page for the latest and greatest educational Chime
scripts.
Cn3D (Read as See in 3D) is a superb new free viewer from the
National
Center for Biotechnology Information. It uses "cleaned-up" PDB files
converted to ASN.1 format available thru WWW Entrez, also available
directly within Cn3D which will itself query the Entrez database.
Considerable
effort has been applied to the ASN.1 data files to resolve
ambiguities present
in the PDB format and remove errors present in some PDB files. See
the
on-line article by Hogue et al. for an explanation. Cn3D is more
intelligent
than RasMol -- for example, it provides a more informative first
image of a
structure.
WebLab from Molecular Simulations, Inc. is free and runs on Windows
and
Macintoshes, and is in part derived from RasMol. It can represent
alpha
helices as cylinders, can add missing hydrogen atoms, and can rotate
residues
around a bond (torsion). Excellent for selecting (including by mouse
clicking)
a subset of atoms and saving them to a separate file. MSI offers
nice
prepackaged sets of examples of various types of molecular
structures (mostly
readable only in WebLab, though). WebLab is highly recommended!
MAGE (molecular animations; PC/Windows, Mac)
Swiss-PdbViewer ( Switzerland / US Mirror) program by Nicolas Guex
and
Manuel C. Pietsch. This program runs on Macintosh or Windows NT/95
(but
not Windows 3.1x). You can overlay and align multiple structures,
mutate
amino acids (the best rotamer of the new AA is found automatically),
and
dynamically find/display hydrogen bonds. Upgraded to version 2.0
March,
1996 (first Windows version; Mac version now supports Quickdraw3D).
LinusLite is a free test version of a forthcoming enhanced version
of the
commercial viewer MacMolecule. These programs run only on the
Macintosh, and require a special atomic coordinate data file format,
generated
from PDB files with a free translator provided.
WPDB (Windows Protein Data Base)
MovieMol makes ball-and-stick animations of molecular structures,
and runs
on PC DOS, IBM RISC/6000, and SGI workstations. It is free to
academic
researchers.
Free Molecular Animations using Animation Works show off alpha
helix, beta
sheet, DNA, tRNA, homeoboxes, and DNA polymerase.
VMD (Visual Molecular Dynamics) runs on Silicon Graphics
workstations
(IRIX 5.x). This sophisticated package can produce virtual reality
3D, show
molecular dynamics simulations, and has a script language complete
with
loops, variables, conditional branching, and subroutines. It comes
complete
with C++ source code from the Theoretical Biophysics Group of the
Beckman Institute at the Univ Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
Hingefind is an X-PLOR script by Willy Wriggers which identifies
domain
movements in proteins. It generates output files which can be
visualized with
standard software.
Computational Center for Macromolecular Structures, CCMS, at the San
Diego Supercomputer Center. Here you can get free programs including
SHAPE (analysis of molecular surfaces), FLEX (molecular animations),
PDBtool (browser), XTALVIEW (X-ray crystal structure solver). These
are
mostly for unix/workstations/xwindows systems.
Midas+ isn't free from UCSF but an academic license costs only $350.
It is
very powerful and runs on Silicon Graphics, DEC Alpha AXP, and NeXT
workstations.
ChemDraw & Chem3D, free demo software from CambridgeSoft Corp.,
which also provides a web-searchable database of molecules.
(Windows,
Mac, unix)
MolGen (Windows, OS/2, Sun) computes molecular structures. Free demo
for up to 100 atoms. University of Bayreuth, Germany.
PDBTools, a small package of home-made C programs for extracting
subsets
of PDB files or combining PDB files.
The US NIH Molecular Modeling group provides a very comprehensive
listing of software (free and commercial).
The Institute for Molecular Virology at the Univ Wisconsin maintains
an
annotated list of molecular visualization software.
Brookhaven National Laboratory lists some free software tools for
advanced
protein structurists.
Back to Free Molecular Visualization Resources Other than RasMol
This page is maintained by emartz@microbio.umass.edu
