Back


Newsgroup sci.stat.consult 21919

Directory

Subject: Re: kappa -- From: Chauncey Parker <"chaunce\"removethis\""@u.washington.edu>
Subject: Evaluating stock-picking system -- From: Alfred Vinton
Subject: telephone -- From: david11763@aol.com (David11763)
Subject: Best Design of Experiments software -- From: Diana Kornbrot

Articles

Subject: Re: kappa
From: Chauncey Parker <"chaunce\"removethis\""@u.washington.edu>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 1997 01:42:50 -0800
Richard F Ulrich wrote:
> 
> William Delaney (wdelaney@DREAMSCAPE.COM) wrote:
> : We have tried to use  STATA to derive Kappa values.Intercooled STATA can't
> : handle more than 250 enteries of a 5 choice table to compare inter-rater
snip . . .
I'm not sure that I follow your rating task.  Seems that it might be an 
interval type measurement.  If so, Pearson's or t-test don't seem like 
they would express agreement and association as would an ICC.
If your measure is interval like, ICC is the interrater reliabability 
stat to use; I would think.  but alas, I'm still quite a naive student.
Return to Top
Subject: Evaluating stock-picking system
From: Alfred Vinton
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 1997 09:25:40 -0500
----------
From:   Cab Vinton[SMTP:cvinton@moe.webstersite.com]
Sent:   Sunday, January 12, 1997 9:22 AM
To:     'STAT-L'
Subject:        Evaluating stock-picking system
After ploughing my way through an introductory stats textbook,
this is what I've come up with in terms of possible tests for
evaluating the results of a stock-picking system (returns price
deltas over N weeks for K stocks; 5 wks, 30 stocks at present):
1./ Hypergeometric distributions (or maybe binomial?), given
probabilities of deltas < or > X% for both the system and the
market as a whole.
2./ Z-tests (hypothesis testing), given mean and standard dev'n
of deltas for both the system and the market as a whole (if I
want to use a random sample from the market as a stand-in,
any guidelines on the minimum number of stocks to use?)
3./ Chi-square tests, given frequencies/ probabilities of deltas,
for both the system and the market as a whole, segregated into
bins (EG 10-15%, 15-20%, etc.)
4./ Analysis of variance tests: not sure how to do these when
working w/ a sample from a much larger population.
5./ Rank tests: not sure how or whether to apply these either . . .
Any guidance on the appropriateness of these would be greatly
appreciated:
* do the tests make assumptions that don't apply to stock prices?
& if so, does it matter?
* any suggested references in the literature (books, articles,
encyclopedia articles, etc.) of particular usefulness?
* other tests I'm not familiar with?
* other newsgroups/ mailing lists worth posting this inquiry to?
Many thanks in advance,
Cab Vinton
cvinton@moe.webstersite.com
Return to Top
Subject: telephone
From: david11763@aol.com (David11763)
Date: 12 Jan 1997 17:15:05 GMT
do u know any telephone Stats
Return to Top
Subject: Best Design of Experiments software
From: Diana Kornbrot
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 1997 19:20:18 +0000
try JMP IN from Duxford Press or JMP from SAS.
diana kornbrot
On Wed, 8 Jan 1997, StanDN826 wrote:
> I am looking for "user friendly" Design of Experiments software.
> Something that will generate designs and analyze them completely, with
> high quality associated graphical output.  Software that I have typically
> seen usually falls short in one form or another or does not focus on DOE
> very well.  I am a user of S-Plus (S-DOX) and Statistica/w (for graphics),
> but I need something that will suit the needs of some of my less
> experienced colleagues and reports.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Dr. Stan Prybyla
> BFGoodrich Aerospace
> prybyla@research.bfg.com <- please e-mail response here in addition to
> posting.
>
Return to Top

Downloaded by WWW Programs
Byron Palmer