Newsgroup sci.techniques.mag-resonance 1132

Directory

Subject: The Two Magnetic Fields -- From: "Howard L. Chappell"
Subject: NMR and MRI -- From: jsnodgrass
Subject: Re: NMR and MRI -- From: ackolbert@aol.com (ACKolbert)
Subject: Re: NMR and MRI -- From: jamesl@netcom.com (James Logajan)
Subject: Acoustic noise during MRI scan? Why? -- From: "ed thelen"
Subject: Re: NMR and MRI -- From: ackolbert@aol.com (ACKolbert)
Subject: perfusion mri software -- From: Kjell-Inge Gjesdal

Articles

Subject: The Two Magnetic Fields
From: "Howard L. Chappell"
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 1996 21:03:49 -0600
I have placed a paper with the above title on the Web in order to put
forth many reasons to believe that present day descriptions of magnetic
fields are incorrect.  
The address is:
http://www.mcs.com/~chappell/magnetism/magnetism.html
Here I describe my model of magnetic fields, which includes the separate
fields for the two forces from dipole atoms and a description of the
alignment of atoms in both the bar magnet and a current carrying
conductor.  I encourage comments and inquiries from interested parties. 
The purpose of the paper is to attempt to convince readers that this
phase of physics is a wide open field ready for many discoveries.
Howard L. Chappell
chappell@mcs.com
Return to Top
Subject: NMR and MRI
From: jsnodgrass
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 1996 03:03:47 -0700
Is NMR and MRI considered the same in the medical field?
NMR=Nuclear Magnetic resonance
Return to Top
Subject: Re: NMR and MRI
From: ackolbert@aol.com (ACKolbert)
Date: 3 Nov 1996 13:04:02 -0500
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) used to be called by its more descriptive
name, NMR Imaging, however the medical profession got too many concerned
queries from patients on the use of a "nuclear" technique, which the
uninformed associated with radiation and danger.  NMR imaging is now
universally referred to as MRI in medical journals.  You can find some
discussions of this in the New England Journal of Medicine prior to 1980.
Andrew C. Kolbert
NMR Spectroscopist
DSM Copolymer Inc
Baton Rouge, LA
Return to Top
Subject: Re: NMR and MRI
From: jamesl@netcom.com (James Logajan)
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 1996 19:49:50 GMT
jsnodgrass (jsnodgrass@mho.net) wrote:
: Is NMR and MRI considered the same in the medical field?
: NMR=Nuclear Magnetic resonance
Possibly; although they aren't the same. MRI=Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Within physics and physical chemistry, NMR is not normally associated with
imaging, but with chemical analysis. And magnetic resonance in general could
be said to include electron spin resonance (ESR) and NMR.
Return to Top
Subject: Acoustic noise during MRI scan? Why?
From: "ed thelen"
Date: 4 Nov 1996 00:55:45 GMT
A friend had an MRI scan done for a jaw condition.
He reported that the acoustical noise was very unpleasant.
He said that about every second in time, there was 
a very loud "Bang" noise as though a hammer struck metal.
Is this the correct place to request an explaination?
Return to Top
Subject: Re: NMR and MRI
From: ackolbert@aol.com (ACKolbert)
Date: 3 Nov 1996 23:40:48 -0500
From: jamesl@netcom.com (James Logajan)
:jsnodgrass (jsnodgrass@mho.net) wrote:
: Is NMR and MRI considered the same in the medical field?
: NMR=Nuclear Magnetic resonance
>Possibly; although they aren't the same. MRI=Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
>Within physics and physical chemistry, NMR is not normally associated
with
>imaging, but with chemical analysis. And magnetic resonance in general
could
>be said to include electron spin resonance (ESR) and NMR.
ESR imaging is not used in medicine, though there are some academic groups
working on developing it.  The problem with ESR imaging is that you have
to introduce a toxic level of nitrosyl radicals to get a decent image. 
Not exactly what we hope for in a non-invasive technique.
Andrew C. Kolbert
Return to Top
Subject: perfusion mri software
From: Kjell-Inge Gjesdal
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 1996 16:25:13 +0100
Dear Colleagues
To analyse our MRI perfusion studies we need better software than the
one provided on our MRI scanner.
What we would like to produce are not only perfusion curves, but a
colored presentation of pixels that has changed in intensity by a input 
given percentage.
We would also like to know how many of these pixels there are compared
to the number of pixels found in a traced out tumor.
This to help rule out possible blood vessels.
I any of you know of such software, please contact me by e-mail.
(Our scanner is a Philips ACS-NT)
Sincerely Kjell-Inge Gjesdal, Ph.D
Return to Top

Downloaded by WWW Programs
Byron Palmer