![]() |
![]() |
Back |
"Take a Minute, Save an Hour!" Looking for a hard-to-find product? Tired of voice mail, fuzzy faxes, phone tag? Need to contact a vendor? Then… Search our database of over 5000 laboratory suppliers. Use SciMail(SM) to broadcast requests for price quotes, literature, technical/sales assistance, and more! Send SciMail… It’s Smart. It’s Easy. It’s FREE! "http://sciquest.com" SciQuest - It’s about YOUR time. We also value your feedback and support so much that we want to give you free stuff for it!! It's our way of saying thanks for taking the time to help us. After using our site, go to the "Free Stuff for Feedback" button and fill out the feedback form. You will receive a free SciQuest T-shirt or hat if: -you make a suggestion to improve our site and we adopt your idea. -we use your email comments in our marketing materials. -you get a qualified vendor to register online. -you convince five new users to become a SciQuester (have them put your userid or name in the Other text box when asked "How Did You Find Out About SciQuest?" on the "Be a SciQuester" membership form). -you post a message to a Usenet group or Listserv telling your peers about SciQuest. send an email to the Site Director (sqsitedirector@sciquest.com)with the details of the message and which groups you posted to. ____________________________________________________________________ Joe Bumgarner, Jr. SciQuest - "Internet Solutions for Science" jbumgarner@sciquest.com "http://sciquest.com" Site Director Phone: 919-732-5813 FAX: 919-782-3123 ____________________________________________________________________Return to Top
"Robert E. Fields"Return to Topwrote: }I have a question about resolution and resolving power. Maybe I'm }missing something because it seems like such a simple question, but }I've been sifting through the literature and having trouble coming up }with an answer. }I've found resolution defined as (delta)m/m and also as m/(delta)m - }even in different chapters of the same book though by different }authors. When it is quoted as "parts" the implication is (delta)m/m - }i.e. 1 part in 1500. }Resolving power seems to always be defined as m/(delta)m. }I believe the correct answer is that resolution is (delta)m/m and }resolving power the inverse, but have seen so many quote mass }spectrometer resolution as m/(delta)m that I have to ask. }Is there an accepted/correct convention or are these essentially used }interchangably with the meaning clear from the use? }Thanks in advance, }Robert Fields Robert, The American Society for Mass Spectrometry has published an article entitled "Standard Definitions of Terms Relating to Mass Spectrometry: A Report from the Committee on Measurements and Standards of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry" (P. Phrice, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 1991, 2, 336-348) that provides a guideline for the MS community with regards to the definitions of resolution and resolving power. My preference is resolution defined at FWHM because it allows for evaluation of instrumental performance while observing only a single peak as opposed to the mixture necessary for the 10% valley definition. I hope you find this info helpful. The replicated ASMS definitions are as follows: Resolution: 10% valley definition, M/deltaM. Let two peaks of equal height in a mass spectrum at masses M and M-deltaM be separated by a valley that at its lowest point is just 10% of the height of either peak. For similar peaks at a mass exceeding M, let the height of the valley at its lowest point be more (by any amount) than 10% of either peak height. Then the resolution (10% valley definition) is M/deltaM. It is usually a function of M, therefore M/deltaM should be given for a number of values of M. Resolution: peak width definition, M/deltaM. For a single peak made up of singly charged ions at mass M in a mass spectrum, the resolution may be expressed as M/deltaM, where deltaM is the width of the peak at a height that is a specified fraction of the maximum peak height. It is recommeded that one of three values 50%, 5%, or 0.5% be used. For an isolated symmetrical peak, recorded with a system that is linear in the range between 5% and 10% levels of the peak, the 5% peak width definition is technically equivalent to the 10% valley definition. A common standard is the definition of resolution based upon deltaM being full width of the peak at half its maximum height, sometimes abbreviated "FWHM". Resolving Power (mass). The abilitity to distinguish between ions differing slightly in mass-to-charge ratio. It may be characterized by giving the peak width, measured in mass units, expressed as a function of mass, for at least two points on the peak, specifically for 50% and for 5% of the maximum peak height. Lloyd W. Sumner, Ph.D. Associate Director, The Laboratory for Biological Mass Spectrometry Voice #(409)845-8404 Fax#(409)845-4719 Email Sumner@chemvx.tamu.edu Lottery: A tax on people who are bad at math.
In article <574ekf$nse@acmey.gatech.edu>, Huang@wuchem.wustl.edu says: } }Hello. I have a question here if someone can help me. Besides PEG, what }other scources can give a polymer-like patten with mass diffrence of 44 }amu. Thank you. } } Alkyphenol ethoxylate type surfactants i.e. octyl and nonyl phenol ethoxylates give mass spectra very similar to PEG since the repeating unit is also an ethoxylate group in these cases.Return to Top
The next San Francisco bay area mass spectrometry (BAMS) meeting will be held on Tuesday, December 10, 1996, at the Holiday Inn Hotel, Foster City, CA. NEW MASS SPECTROMETRIC APPROACHES FOR SOLVING BIOLOGICAL PROBLEMS Brian T. Chait The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Ave., NY 10021 We have recently developed a new matrix-assisted laser desorption (MALDI) ion trap mass spectrometer [1-3], which we have found to be an extraordinarily powerful tool for the analysis of biopolymers. The capacity of the ion trap for high-sensitivity multi-stage mass spectrometry is of particular appeal for biological applications that require the determination of the primary structures of proteins - e.g., the identification of proteins, the elucidation of posttranslational modifications, and the determination of sites of interaction. An attractive strategy for solving problems of this type involves enzymatic digestion of the protein, followed by mass spectrometric analysis of individual components of the resulting complex mixture of peptide ions. This strategy, which does not require prior chromatographic separation of the peptides, is fast and sensitive. In my talk I will discuss the development of the MALDI ion trap together with a range of applications of the approach described above, including protein identification of proteins components of complex biological machines, rapid mapping of disulfide bonds in proteins, definition of complex phosphorylation/dephosphorylation events in proteins, determination of protein glycosylation, and definition of functional sites of interaction between biopolymers. If I have time, I will discuss the use of mass spectrometry in the determination of high resolution structures of proteins. [1] J. Qin, R. J. J. M. Steenvoorden & B.T. Chait "A practical ion trap mass spectrometer for the analysis of peptides by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization" Anal. Chem. 68 (1996) 1784 - 1791. [2] J. Qin & B.T. Chait "Matrix-assisted laser desorption ion trap mass spectrometry: efficient trapping and ejection of ions" Anal. Chem. 68 (1996) 2102 - 2107. [3] J. Qin & B.T. Chait "Matrix-assisted laser desorption ion trap mass spectrometry: Efficient isolation and effective fragmentation of peptide ions" Anal. Chem. 68 (1996) 2108 - 2112. This meeting will follow the traditional BAMS format: 6:00 pm Social hour (no-host cocktails) 7:00 pm Dinner ($25, reservations required - see below) 8:15 pm Lecture (lecture is free, reservations not required) Dinner reservations are required, and the deadline is Friday December 6 at noon. Dinner choices are Champagne Chicken, Coho Salmon Almondine, or Vermicelli with Sundried Tomatoes and Portabello Mushrooms. RSVP to Paul Schnier at (510) 642-6240 or pds@uclink4.berkeley.edu. For more information, please contact either Paul (phone/e-mail given above) or Hugh Gregg (phone, e-mail below). -- Hugh Gregg Lawrence Livermore Nat. Lab. (510) 423-7501 hugh-gregg@llnl.govReturn to Top