![]() |
![]() |
Back |
Christopher Kaine wrote: } } Finngan Customers: } } It has been my pleasure to assist and train some of you during my 8 year } tenure with Finnigan. It is Finnigan management's plan that my and other } educated/trained and experienced mass-spectroscopist Technical } Specialist's services are no longer required for the customers or Service } Engineers. I will though, continue to avail myself to this newsgroup to } offer what ever expertise I may. } } Again, I thank-you and wish you all the best in the coming years. } } Cordially; } } Christopher J. Kaine } ex-Finnigan Technical Specialist Sorry, my typing leaves something to be desired. Should be FinniganReturn to Top
Does FT-IR comparasion really give an accurate "fingerprint" of a material such as a two component epoxy such that the FT-IR results could be used as a stand alone quality verification of the material? Example: We identify a specific batch of coating that has the desired properties we want a manufacturer to reproduce from batch to batch. We have the initial batch "fingerprinted" by FT-IR and use that spectra as the "master fingerprint" to which all subsequent batches are examined by FT-IR and compared to the master. If the spectra is "reasonably identical", does that alone assure us that the coating is really the same as the master batch? Are there other lab tests that would give us a higher degree of confidence? Thank you very much! Michael Crapps Corporate Quality Assurance Manager S.G. Pinney & Associates, Inc. Port St. Lucie, FLReturn to Top
Karl J. Treier of UniTech wrote: } } I was trying to reach the Teknivent website and it appears to have gone. } Has the company ? } Teknivent has been acquired by ProLab resources. They can be reached at: ProLab Resources, Inc. prolab@ix.netcom.com http://www.prolab.com (608) 278-0002 (608) 278-0072 FAX -- John H. Callahan Code 6113/Analytical Chemistry Section Naval Research Laboratory Washington, D.C. 20375 202-767-0719 FAX 202-404-8119 John.Callahan@nrl.navy.mil http://chem1.nrl.navy.mil/analyticalReturn to Top
kd4wyn@emi.net wrote: } } Does FT-IR comparasion really give an accurate "fingerprint" of a material } such as a two component epoxy such that the FT-IR results could be used as } a stand alone quality verification of the material? } } Example: } We identify a specific batch of coating that has the desired properties we } want a manufacturer to reproduce from batch to batch. We have the initial } batch "fingerprinted" by FT-IR and use that spectra as the "master } fingerprint" to which all subsequent batches are examined by FT-IR and } compared to the master. If the spectra is "reasonably identical", does } that alone assure us that the coating is really the same as the master } batch? Are there other lab tests that would give us a higher degree of } confidence? } } Thank you very much! } } Michael Crapps } Corporate Quality Assurance Manager } S.G. Pinney & Associates, Inc. } Port St. Lucie, FL FT-IR can give you very reproducible information regarding the chemistry of the batch (ie relative concentration of molcular species or covalent bonds/functional groups) but will not tell you how well the coating is bonded or what the structural properties of the material are. -- Sincerely, Chad Nelson Advanced Fuel Research, Inc. 87 Church Street East Hartford, CT 06108-3742 "The views expressed above are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Advanced Fuel Research, Inc. or any affiliates."Return to Top
Dear sir/madam, My name is Paul Slater, and I am currently completing my Ph.D. in novel applications of electrospray mass spectrometry. My main area of interest is in the use of organic adducts to improve the quality of salt contaminated spectra and to quantify the number of polar groups, (for example, sulfonates), that are present. I have achieved this goal with a wide range of complex polysulfonated compounds, mainly azo dyes. In October my partner and I will be moving to Australia for approximately one year. During this period I hope to find work or research in my field. I would be grateful if you could therefore advise me on some contacts whom I can approach and arrange a possible visit. Thank you in advance for your time and help. With very best wishes, Paul Slater EPSRC National Mass Spectrometry Service Centre, Department of Chemistry, University of Wales Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP. U.K.Return to Top
Our Varian 3400CX gas chromatograph coupled to out Saturn 3 GC/MS has a 1077 Split/Splitless injector. After a BTEX run on the Tekmar 2016 autosampler, the backpressure gauge on the GC went to zero! We notice when tripping the GC into run mode, the pressure returns. The pressure is lost again when GC returns to ready mode. We are having a difficult time identifying the problem. Has anyone had a similar problem? Thanks, Ken Brandau ------------------------------------- Name: J K Brandau E-mail: J K BrandauReturn to TopDate: 1/17/97 Time: 9:19:27 AM This message was sent by Chameleon -------------------------------------