Don't forget - bookmark this site now, so you can find your way back!
Only the geologic reservoir characterization portion of this study is presented here. Geologic reservoir characterization---utilizing geologic, geophysical, and engineering data in an integrated and optimal fashion--- provides the cornerstone of any improved recovery and reservoir management strategy. In this case, approximately 1100 wells, several cores, well production and completion information, and a partial 3D seismic survey were utilized to develop a comprehensive geological reservoir model. Analysis of such a large set of information required a data management system. We developed a system utilizing the PC because it is the choice of computing environments by many Independent Operators. Results of the study revealed much more diversity and complexity in reservoir characteristics than had previously been recognized. It is these results that are presented below.
It is worth noting the main conclusions of the full interdisciplinary project. Improved understanding of the geology of the field area---coupled with petrophysics, estimating parameters of net pay, drainage area, and recovery factor, then reservoir simulation history matching---led to an increase in the reserve estimates over earlier estimates. For a detailed 12+ Section focus area, the revision in reserve estimates has an estimated incremental net present value (discounted at 10%) of $14 million. A major conclusion of the project was that interaction of people with different disciplines and integration of diverse data types both led to improved reservoir characterization and reduced uncertainty in the reserve estimates, with significant economic benefit (VanKirk, 1996).
Figure 1. Location of Hambert-Aristocrat Field
Figure 2. Flow chart for database development.
Figure 3. Structure contour map.
Figure 4. Structural cross-section.
Figure 5. Well log patterns.
Figure 6a. Gamma ray log and rock properties for Machii-Ross.
Figure 7. Gamma ray log and rock properties
for the #1 Donald Mosher.
Figure 8. Gross thickness isopach of the Terry Sandstone.
Figure 9. Stratigraphic cross-section.
Figure 10. Schematic sequence stratigraphic interpretation
of the Terry Sandstone.
Figure 11. Isopach of Parasequence B.
Figure 12. Isopach of Parasequence C.
Figure 13. Isopach of Parasequence D.
Figure 14. Isopach of Parasequence E.
Figure 15. Isopach of Parasequence F.
Figure 16. Isopach of Parasequence G.
- with special thanks to ANDREW M. SLATT for providing color graphics
Go to the national PTTC Home page
Back to the Rockies PTTC Home page
We appreciate your comments, please send us your comments at: