Newsgroup sci.engr.mech 28412

Directory

Subject: Re: Ignitioning Yourself -- From: mcinnis@austin.ibm.com (McInnis)
Subject: Re: Bench EDM -- From: "Roger P. Waldock"
Subject: Heater Design -- From: "Michael Fletcher"
Subject: Re: Fighting Complexity -- From: edmoore@vcd.hp.com (Ed Moore)
Subject: Re: Ignitioning Yourself -- From: ronk@planet.ho.att.com (ron)
Subject: Solar Panel -- From: Max Edelhauser
Subject: Re: solder accelereted ageing -- From: furini@embratel.net.br (roberto furini filho)
Subject: FS: ChE/Civil/Mech/BioChem Handbooks, at least 50% off -- From: chiang@cs.uiuc.edu (Sam HK Chiang)
Subject: Statics programs available? -- From: gpelkey@atl.mindspring.com (Gary Pelkey)
Subject: Re: Ignitioning Yourself -- From: ss80xt@worldnet.att.net (Steve S. )
Subject: Re: Statics programs available? -- From: chrisw@skypoint.com (Christopher Wright)
Subject: Re: Ignitioning Yourself -- From: Patrick Bulmer
Subject: Re: Ignitioning Yourself -- From: sberch@world.std.com (S.J. Berch)
Subject: Re: Drafting Software Survey -- From: noran@ix.netcom.com(Katarina Weinberg)
Subject: Re: Fighting Complexity -- From: chrisw@skypoint.com (Christopher Wright)
Subject: pet design -- From: gordon menzies
Subject: Re: Ignitioning Yourself -- From: firstkey@baradv.com (Yeggster)
Subject: Re: Ignitioning Yourself -- From: "Lawrence S. Galt"
Subject: Re: Modeling a screw or bolt -- From: Mighty Dog
Subject: Re: Solar Panel -- From: Robert Davis
Subject: Rubber Diaphragms -- From: hdorot@netvision.net.il
Subject: Re: Fighting Complexity -- From: Jonathan@actors.demon.co.uk (Jonathan Haigh)
Subject: Re: Ignitioning Yourself -- From: brindle@lf.hp.com (Mark Brindle)

Articles

Subject: Re: Ignitioning Yourself
From: mcinnis@austin.ibm.com (McInnis)
Date: 11 Nov 1996 22:21:30 GMT
In article <55iomi$dc8$4@mhadf.production.compuserve.com>, DC <75277.3335@CompuServe.COM> writes:
> Why doesn't a person electrocute himself when he turns on the
> ignition in a car, since he is holding a metal key contacting metal
> leads (to the battery) in the steering column, and moreover his body
> is touching the car's ground (its frame)?
> Thanks for clarifying this.
>
> --
> From 75277.3335 at CompuServe
Well, I haven't disassembled one lately, but I'd bet that the lock
is electrically isolated from the contacts for the ignition.  i.e.
there's insulating material between the lock and the hot wire.
Actually, I've heard that you can electrocute yourself with 12 Volts,
but it's real hard to accomplish.
-- 
Mickey McInnis - mcinnis@austin.ibm.com
--
All opinions expressed are my own opinions, not my company's opinions.
Return to Top
Subject: Re: Bench EDM
From: "Roger P. Waldock"
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 14:08:02 -0700
Pedro D. Peralta wrote:
> 
>                Hi there!
> 
>                My group here at Los Alamos National Lab is trying to get into
>    a small EDM, preferably something that can fit in top of a bench and that
>    can do straight cuts with decent precision. I have talked to the people
>    of Brother and Charmilles, and they do not seem to have anything like
>    that (they have good machines, but they are kind of too big for what
>    we have in mind). Does anyboby out there know if such "bench" EDM's
>    exist? Any pointers would be greatly appreciated.
> 
>                   Thanks,
> 
>                                                 Pedro D. Peralta
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  pperalta@lanl.gov                              Los Alamos National Lab
>  Phone: (505) 665-3289                          Center for Materials Science
>  Fax: (505) 665-2992                            MS K765
>                                                 Los Alamos, NM 87545
Pedro
We market a "benchtop EDM". Cabinet dimensions 29" wide x 28 1/2" deep
x  22 1/2" high.  The basic system starts at ~ $22K and then options
such as lathe, planer, slicer etc can be added.
Call me if you think this will suit your needs.  I will mail you more
information.
Best regards
Roger Waldock 
-- 
Roger Waldock, MR Semicon Inc. 6200 Eubank Blvd. NE #415, Albuquerque,
NM 87111-7313. Tel: (505) 294-5761, Fax: (505) 294-5772
Return to Top
Subject: Heater Design
From: "Michael Fletcher"
Date: 11 Nov 1996 19:59:25 GMT
I wonder if anybody can help.
I am currently building a Vacuum Forming Machine . I need help calculating
the layout of the  platten heater bank (1500mm   x   1000mm). I will be
using conventional Infa-Red electric elements, but what wattage, and what
quantity?
If anybody has any literature, please send it my way.
-- 
 \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ 
 Mike  Fletch  Ndip eleceng(heavy current)
 /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\
Return to Top
Subject: Re: Fighting Complexity
From: edmoore@vcd.hp.com (Ed Moore)
Date: 10 Nov 1996 04:33:28 GMT
Jonathan Priluck (jamcorp@world.std.com) wrote:
:                               How woud you explain to a person who is
: convinced that they don't need to build the prototype becuase they already
: know the answer that maybe their analysis is not as foolproof a they think.
: Here comes the hard part of the assignment.  You have to explain it without
: telling or even implying that they might be wrong.  The reason for this is
: that it's not worth the managerial problems it would create over the long
: term.
I've sat here for quite a while staring at your question.  I wish I could
answer it.  The situation reminds me of something Tony Rizzo said here a
couple years ago.  Paraphrasing (very loosely, probably), learning cannot
begin until one admits the possibility that one doesn't already have all the
answers.  A tactic that might work in a few situations is to challenge the
other person to put his money behind his answer.  I don't see how that would
fit in your predicament.  I think a lot of analysts would seek verification
by prototype before betting their own money on their predictions.
: >Reminds me of when I was young.  I loved stress analysis.  I could
: >calculate what the stresses would be in a part.  I had an older lead
: >engineer who often would show in minutes that the stresses were low
: >enough that we didn't care what they really were.  It took a lot of
: >fun out of the job, but it saved an enormous amount of time.
: In other words, is it relevant?  That's such a difficult question to ask,
: people always assume their questions are relevant.  Of course most questions
: are not relevant, some questions don't even really make sense they only
: appear to becuase they have the proper gramatical form and can be asked.
When I was in a large CAD group at Boeing, a business graduate was hired into
the organization.  I was really surprised.  What could a non-technical person
contribute to a CAD organization?  Quite a lot, in fact.  We engineers are
trained to solve problems.  This fellow was trained to manage problems.  When
a new problem appears, the engineer starts thinking about solutions.  This
business fellow, who was actually a friend of mine, started asking "silly"
questions.  Does this problem need to be solved?  Should it be solved here
or elsewhere?  Though he never solved a technical problem himself, he justified
his cost by preventing us sometimes-myopic technical folks from wasting time
on problems that could simply be ignored or left to others.
: That's just it Ed, most engineers I work with these days just don't beleive in
: prototypes.
That's news to me.  Maybe I've been out of college too long.  In my 29-year
career I've spent only the last 4.5 years in a high volume, low cost product
business.  I find prototypes almost worshiped here.  I would expect that in
any business that builds parts by the millions.
: Interesting.  LBM is itself a high volume low cost item.  Right now that's
: not the case but that is the goal and it's not a matter of figuring out if
: it can be done or not, it's simply a matter of making it so. At the same
: time, the most important applications for LBM are in aviation and other
: areas with similar ground rules.  Will aviation people use a material that
: is stronger and lighter if it also costs less?  I half way suspect they will
: not.
I never worked on military aircraft, so I can't comment on that industry.  But
the jet transport business is so competitive that I'd expect your material to
be considered on its merits without any resistance to its low cost.
Thanks for starting this thread.  I hope others contribute their perspectives
on prototyping.
--
Ed Moore
Hewlett-Packard         	The keyboard is my employer's, but
Vancouver, WA, USA      	the keystrokes belong only to me.

Return to Top
Subject: Re: Ignitioning Yourself
From: ronk@planet.ho.att.com (ron)
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 96 20:44:08 GMT
 DC <75277.3335@CompuServe.COM> wrote:
>Why doesn't a person electrocute himself when he turns on the 
>ignition in a car, since he is holding a metal key contacting metal 
>leads (to the battery) in the steering column, and moreover his body
>is touching the car's ground (its frame)?
>Thanks for clarifying this.
>
First it's only 12 volts which is not high enough to hurt you.
Second the key mechanism is insulated from the switch mechanism so you never 
come in contact with battery voltage anyway.
There are voltages under the hood (when the engine (non-diesel) is running) 
which will give you a nice zap.  They won't kill you unless you have a bad heart 
since they don't have much power behind them.  You want to stay away from the 
big fat wires which go to the sparkplugs.
Ron 
Return to Top
Subject: Solar Panel
From: Max Edelhauser
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 17:17:21 -0800
Does anyone know of a manufacturer of a complete off-the-shelf assembly
for Solar Panel + Mounting Post + Battery Charger + Battery  solution,
like the road emergency celular phone sites along the highways?
Please let me know if you do. I would prefere an e-mail response, but a
news group response is OK too.
- Max
Return to Top
Subject: Re: solder accelereted ageing
From: furini@embratel.net.br (roberto furini filho)
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 01:32:08 GMT
On 6 Nov 1996 14:30:06 GMT, thebaud@ixl.u-bordeaux.fr (Jean-Marc
Thebaud (Resp. C. Zardini)) wrote:
>
>	I am looking for information about solder accelereted ageing, but I would like an answer from the mechanics point of view. If you cannot answer the following questions, please give me references which could help me :
>
>	* what comparision can be made between two identical samples (that is same geometry and same alloy composition) which have undergone two different thermal loadings but whose stress-strain hysteresis curves have the same area?
>
>	* in particular, can we assess that these two samples are at the same state of their lifetime and at the same degree of fatigue?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Jean-Marc THEBAUD
>  PhD studend
>
>
>
>
Dear Jean
I know a good book about accelerated testing that could help you,
it's: "Accelerated Testing", Wayne Nelson .
Wiley & Sons.
Please, let me know about your advance, because it's the theme of my
master thesis.
Regards
Roberto 
furini@embratel.net.br
Return to Top
Subject: FS: ChE/Civil/Mech/BioChem Handbooks, at least 50% off
From: chiang@cs.uiuc.edu (Sam HK Chiang)
Date: 12 Nov 1996 03:08:16 GMT
All books are at least 50% off publisher's price (see
http://www.mcgraw-hill.com and http://www.wiley.com).
No reasonable offers refused.
Sam.
----------------------BEGIN---------------------------------------
CHEMICAL/CIVIL/MECHANICAL ENGINEERING BOOKS
===========================================
<1>
R.H. Perry. Perry's Chem. Engr's Handbook, 6th ed, (cur rel), 
  McGraw-Hill, 1984.
Hard cover. Publisher's price $129.5
Good condition.
Ask  $65
Description:
This is the new edition of the single most comprehensive and 
authoritative reference source available to chemical engineers. 
It has been significantly revised and updated to incorporate 
the many developments that have taken place since the previous 
edition was published over a decade ago. The handbook retains 
its usual broad coverage of all classical chemical engineering 
topics, and in addition, users will find never-before-included
coverage of waste treatment and biochemical engineering. It 
provides current state-of-the-art information on principles, 
design approaches, and equipment, supplemented by substantial 
amounts of data essential for performing calculations and solving 
design problems. 
<2>
H.M. Freeman, Standard Handbook of Hazardour Waste Treatment and 
  Disposal (cur rel), McGraw-Hill, 1989. 
Hard cover. Publisher's price $115
Like New.
Ask  $59
Description:
The timing is right for this kind of in-depth, state-of-the-art 
analysis. Emphasizing current alternatives for managing hazardous 
waste and cleaning up abandoned disposal sites, this handbook 
examines technologies now in use in the field, as well as those 
under development for the future. It also summarizes current
legislation for the treatment and disposal of hazardous
wastes--stressing in particular the ``cradle-to-grave'' approach 
now in vogue. 
<3>
H.C. Vogel, Fermentation & Biochem. Eng. Handbook,
  Noyes publications, 1983.
Hard Cover.  Publisher's price ?
Excellent condition.
Ask $59
This well-rounded, up-to-date handbook of fermentation and 
biochemical engineering presents the latest techniques for
the commerical production of chemicals and pharmaceuticals
via fermentation.  Emphasis is given to unit operations-
fermentation, separation, purification, and recovery.
Principles, process design, and equipment are detailed.
The practical aspects of development, design, and operation
are stressed, and some theory is included to provide the
necessary insight for a particular operation.  Problems
addressed are the collection of pilot data, choice of
scale-up paramenters, selection of the right piece equipment,
pinpointing of likely trouble spots, and methods of 
troubleshooting.  The text, written from a practical and
operating viewpoint, will assist development, design, 
engineering and production personnel in the fermentation
industry.  All of the contributors were selected based on
their industrial background and orientation.
<4>
R.W. Rousseau, Handbook of Separation Process Technology,
  (cur rel) John, Wiley & Sons, 1987.
Hard cover.  Publisher's price $145
Like New.
Ask $73
Description:
Surveys the selection, design, and operation of most of the
industrially important separation processes. Discusses the
underlying principles on which the processes are based, and
provides illustrative examples of the use of the processes in a
modern context. Features thorough treatment of newer separation
processes based on membranes, adsorption, chromatography, ion
exchange, and chemical complexation. Includes a review of
historically important separation processes such as distillation,
absorption, extraction, leaching, and crystallization and
considers these techniques in light of recent developments
affecting them.
<5>
J.E. Bailey, Biochem. Eng. Fundamentals, 2nd ed.(cur rel), 
  McGraw-Hill 1986.
Soft cover.  Publisher's price (hard cover)  $81.82
Ask $29
Description:
This book, written to introduce students to the fundamental 
concepts, knowledge and methodology of biochemical engineering, 
provides students with a self-contained presentation of all of 
the information required for the first overview course in this 
field. The book provides students with an overview of biochemistry, 
microbiology, metabolic chemical reaction networks, enzyme kinetics, 
and molecular genetics so that they can learn the biological basics 
and continue thestudy of engineering aspects. This material is 
up-to-date and includes modern topics extremely important for 
future technological development, such as recombinant DNA 
technology and cell fusion techniques for genetic manipulation. 
<6>
E.B. Nauman, Chem. Reactor Design, John Wiley & Sons, 
  1987. 
Hard cover. Publisher's price ?
Like New.
Ask $29
Description:
This book reflects the tremendous impact of the digital computer 
on themodeling and solution of reactor design problems. No other 
book incorporates such a heavy emphasis on numerical methods and
computation. Throughout, readers are shown how to use and understand 
modern computer-aided design (CAD) techniques, focusing specially 
on design optimization. It also serves as an invaluable reference 
source for industrial engineers who need the latest available 
solution techniques.  In addition, it provides advanced undergraduate 
and graduate students with new information and a new philosophy on 
the application of numerical methods to chemical reaction engineering.
<7>
F.G. Shinskey, Process Control Systems, 3rd ed. (cur rel is 4th ed.), 
  McGraw-Hill, 1986.
Hard cover, publisher's price $69
Like New.
Ask $29
Description:
The best-selling guide to the design of control systems for the 
fluid process industries--now updated and expanded Emphasizing 
performance-based design and tuning, the new edition of the 
best-selling guide to process control provides engineers with 
reliable coverage of control technology principles for industrial 
fluid processes--from basic theory to advanced control applications. 
Written by the foremost authority on process control, the book 
serves as a complete reference to controller selection and tuning, 
controller performance evaluation, and as a design guide for 
configuring optimum systems. Using time-domain and relative-gain 
analysis throughout, Greg Shinskey shows you how to solve common  
control problems and apply proven system solutions--with a minimum 
of effort and mathematical skill. You'll also learn how to use your 
personal computer to speed computations, handle more complex 
situations, and create more accurate process imulations that save 
you time nd make your job easier. Thoroughly revised and updated, 
the Fourth Edition includes new information on inventory control, 
internal model and model predictive control, minimizing deviation 
and integrated error following load changes, closed-loop responses 
for distributred-lag processes, tuning rules for the Smith predictor 
and PID controller with deadtime compensation, the dynamics of the 
static mixer with and without recirculation, process design guidelines 
for pH control, set-point filtering, sampling effects, and more. 
Shinskey's clear explanations--illustrated by more than 250 simulations, 
line drawings, graphs, and response curves--and worked problems at the 
end of each chapter make the book an ideal self-study guide and a 
must-have reference for all engineers who want to keep on top of the 
state of the art in process control.
-- 
+------------------------------------+
  Computer Science Dept.             
  U. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 
  chiang@cs.uiuc.edu                 
Return to Top
Subject: Statics programs available?
From: gpelkey@atl.mindspring.com (Gary Pelkey)
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 03:14:36 GMT
Does anyone know of a computer program (hopefully low cost, free?)
that will help solve general 'statics' type problems.  That is, if I
want to evaluate various truss designs and place a load at one point,
it will tell me the compressions and tensions on various members.
Believe it or not, this is not to solve a homework assignment (took my
last statics and dynamics course 20+ years ago!).  I just have some
ideas I want to fool around with.  Very new to this group so go easy -
if there is a better one to take this to, let me know.
Thanks in advance.
-  Gary
Return to Top
Subject: Re: Ignitioning Yourself
From: ss80xt@worldnet.att.net (Steve S. )
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 00:47:24 GMT
If you really want to "ignition yourself," stand with your nuts
against the fender.  Grab an ignition wire, with your bare hands, as
close to the boot as you can (engine running), and pull the wire off.
Modern HEI ignitions help.
SS
DC <75277.3335@CompuServe.COM> wrote:
>Why doesn't a person electrocute himself when he turns on the 
>ignition in a car, since he is holding a metal key contacting metal 
>leads (to the battery) in the steering column, and moreover his body
>is touching the car's ground (its frame)?
>Thanks for clarifying this.
>-- 
>From 75277.3335 at CompuServe
Return to Top
Subject: Re: Statics programs available?
From: chrisw@skypoint.com (Christopher Wright)
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 22:49:47 -0600
In article <568pu1$jov@camel4.mindspring.com>, gpelkey@atl.mindspring.com wrote:
>Does anyone know of a computer program (hopefully low cost, free?)
>that will help solve general 'statics' type problems.
Head for the ASME Web site and follow the Mecheng BBS software archive
link. Thre'll be some good ones. If you're a Machead try the MacSciTech
web page  and from there to their software
archive.
Christopher Wright P.E.    |"They couldn't hit an elephant from
chrisw@skypoint.com        | this distance"   (last words of Gen.
___________________________| John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania 1864)
http://www.skypoint.com/subscribers/chrisw
Return to Top
Subject: Re: Ignitioning Yourself
From: Patrick Bulmer
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 20:50:28 -0800
ALL igintion switches are isolated from the contact. If the battery had
a direct lead to ANY of the car's framework, it would ground out and
die.
If you want to know what it would feel like to have the contacts wired
to the key, imagine something in between what it feels like to stick
your tongue on a 9v battery and what it would be like to stick your key
in a wall socket. If you haven't experienced these sensations, give 'em
a try... (after you forget you've ever heard of me)
Incidently, Mel Gibson narrowly escaped death by electrocution with a
12v battery in "Lethal Weapon". Of course that was done after he was
soaked in water and delivered to Endo, the sinister asian fellow who
"has forgotten more about inflicting pain than you or I will ever know".
Best to avoid finding yourself locked in a room with a sinister asian
fellow, a 12v battery and water...
-- 
Best Regards,
Patrick
+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
Patrick Bulmer, General Manager
WebAxxess - http://webaxxess.com											
Home of WebAxxess Mall and Picture Classifieds
WebAxxess Information Services
+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
Return to Top
Subject: Re: Ignitioning Yourself
From: sberch@world.std.com (S.J. Berch)
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 03:37:53 GMT
The question was flame-bait.  The original author posted to this to
quite a few newsgroups just to get everyone going...and it worked.
-sb
On Mon, 11 Nov 1996 15:01:45 -0600, Doug Barnes  wrote:
>DC wrote:
>> 
>> Why doesn't a person electrocute himself when he turns on the
>> ignition in a car, since he is holding a metal key contacting metal
>> leads (to the battery) in the steering column, and moreover his body
>> is touching the car's ground (its frame)?
>> Thanks for clarifying this.
>> 
>> --
>> From 75277.3335 at CompuServe
>
>Are you kidding w/ this question.  Why don't you blow yourself up when
>you blowdry your hair while standing on a wet floor in the bathroom??? 
>SAME CONCEPT!!!
Return to Top
Subject: Re: Drafting Software Survey
From: noran@ix.netcom.com(Katarina Weinberg)
Date: 12 Nov 1996 04:21:56 GMT
Very defensive... 
With more women in the workplace the language has to adjust.  Just
using old language ignores the effect it has on the audience.  For
example, you do not start a letter [anymore] with "Dear Sirs."  Another
example is the United States Post Service.  They do not call their mail
carriers for postmen.  
Using "correct" language has to with curtesy.  Consider that while more
and women join the workforce.
In
 Gary Lynn Kerr  writes: 
>
>To whom ever wrote that the term draftsMEN was not correct.  GET A
LIFE!  
>When the word men/man is used in a word it is generic and means
mankind.  
>And a female boss has a problem with it she has too much time on her 
>hands.  Also that same feMALE boss probably would not liked being 
>referred to as feMALE/woMEN.  As I said before GET A LIFE! 
>
>
>On Sat, 9 Nov 
>1996, Jim Weir wrote:
>
>> Peter  shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:
>> 
>> ->ATTENTION ALL ENGINEERS AND DRAFTSMEN:
>> 
>> I'd suggest before you get out into the real world with a female
boss that
>> you find another word for "draftsMEN".
>> > 
>
Return to Top
Subject: Re: Fighting Complexity
From: chrisw@skypoint.com (Christopher Wright)
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 22:44:22 -0600
In article <32878A8D.41C6@mae.carleton.ca>, Chad English
 wrote:
>On the job, the best engineer is the one who can come up with
>the simplest, cheapest solution.  In school, the best engineer is the
>one who can solve the most difficult problem.
But how often is the chosen solution the one put forth by the biggest
stick or the biggest mouth?
Christopher Wright P.E.    |"They couldn't hit an elephant from
chrisw@skypoint.com        | this distance"   (last words of Gen.
___________________________| John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania 1864)
http://www.skypoint.com/subscribers/chrisw
Return to Top
Subject: pet design
From: gordon menzies
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 21:57:44 -0800
looking for someone with experiance designing preforms for 2 stage 
injection/blowmolding.i have experiance with pre-heat design,none on 2 
stage. any help would be appriciated
 G.menzies ph molds ltd
Return to Top
Subject: Re: Ignitioning Yourself
From: firstkey@baradv.com (Yeggster)
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 96 07:38:26 GMT
In article <3286A151.1A95@misterfixit.com>,
   MisterFixit  wrote:
>DC wrote:
>> 
>> Why doesn't a person electrocute himself when he turns on the
>> ignition in a car, since he is holding a metal key contacting metal
>> leads (to the battery) in the steering column, and moreover his body
>> is touching the car's ground (its frame)?
>> Thanks for clarifying this.
>> 
>> --
>> From 75277.3335 at CompuServe
>
>
>Well DC, it's a long story but suffice it to say that:
>
>1)  Even if the ignition key were in contact with the 12 volt system in 
>the car (and it isn't) there is not enough voltage there to "electrocute" 
>a person.
>2)  The normal resistance of the skin on your hands is sufficient to 
>protect your body against shock up to somewhere around fifty volts, 
>assuming that your hands are dry.  Not that you couldn't feel the current 
>at fifty volts, but under "normal" conditions that is not enough voltage 
>to "push" the current through your system.  You might want to take a look 
>at an article I wrote on electrical stuff on my website.  Look for 
>"Electrical" which has the link you should read.
>
>Bob
Thhe oficial point where voltage is considered dangerous is 78 volts....
..voltage above 78 volts is cnsiderd high voltage and below its not
some product are often labled with Max. Occ. voltage 78 volts.
The Direct current is actually much worse to get shocked by in high voltage
then Alternating current.
Yeggster
Return to Top
Subject: Re: Ignitioning Yourself
From: "Lawrence S. Galt"
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 20:45:32 -0800
McInnis wrote:
> 
> Actually, I've heard that you can electrocute yourself with 12 Volts,
> but it's real hard to accomplish.
> --
> Mickey McInnis - mcinnis@austin.ibm.com
>
I current through the chest of 50 milliamps or more is increadably
uncomfortable and generally regarded as potentially lethal for a healthy
adult.  With 12 volts that would reguire a body resistance of 240 Ohms
or less.  To achieve this low a resistance would probably require the
leads to be inserted in open wounds on each side.  Possible but
unlikely.
Of course some one who is ill or of small stature could be killed with
less.  That is why electrical circuits in hospitals are tightly
regulated to minimize leakage currents.
-- 
Larry Galt - - - - A Right Wing South-Paw - - - - lgalt@multiverse.com
When the world thinks right & works left, all thats left will be right!
               UNTIL THEN - KEEP YOUR POWDER DRY!
Return to Top
Subject: Re: Modeling a screw or bolt
From: Mighty Dog
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 16:35:45 +1100
On 5 Nov 1996, Brian Greer wrote:
> Hi,
> 	I need some advice on how to model a screw with a constant pitch
> through the whole length.  I'll be using either Microstation 95 or Autocad
> 13. If any one has any suggestions or blocks(cells), please send over.
> Thanks!     BG          bg@scs.unr.edu
> 
> 
On Autocad(R12) I use a polyline that is the shape of the cross section of
the thread and revolve it to make a solid 'thread'. It is not actually a
thread but it looks like a thread.
	There could be another way on R13 or another CAD program but I
have not found one.
Corey Gibson (alias BUBBLES) is the name, Mech eng is the game.
Remember kids, dog food holds all your daily protien requirements.
MAIL; coreyg@minyos.its.rmit.edu.au
URL; http://minyos.its.rmit.edu.au/~coreyg/index.html
Return to Top
Subject: Re: Solar Panel
From: Robert Davis
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 23:47:51 -0800
Max Edelhauser wrote:
> 
> Does anyone know of a manufacturer of a complete off-the-shelf assembly
> for Solar Panel + Mounting Post + Battery Charger + Battery  solution,
> like the road emergency celular phone sites along the highways?
> 
> Please let me know if you do. I would prefere an e-mail response, but a
> news group response is OK too.
> 
> - Max
Try the cathodic protection industry, NACE is the technical society and
the function is in gas line protection. 
Robo
Return to Top
Subject: Rubber Diaphragms
From: hdorot@netvision.net.il
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 96 11:40:51 PDT
 I am looking for a RUbber Diaphragms suppliers
for valves industries.
thanks.
Bahir I. 
email: hdorot@netvision.net.il
Return to Top
Subject: Re: Fighting Complexity
From: Jonathan@actors.demon.co.uk (Jonathan Haigh)
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 10:26:07 GMT
I've come a bit late into this thread, so haven't worked out all the
players, but somebody suggested having three teams compete by picking
holes in each others designs.
This strikes me as very negative and probably none too helpful.  It's
the easiest thing in the world to find fault, and IMHO will almost
always lead to a compromise solution
If you want to use three teams, how about getting them to find the
*best* features of each design and incorporating them into a single
whole?
Or, (and especially since you only have one team) how about training
them in the ideas of TRIZ (Russian for the Theory of Inventive Problem
Solving) which starts with the idea of an Ideal System - one that
carries out all the required functions of the system, with no actual
devices.  It then offers ways of Trimming - removing all unnecessary
functions - and finally suggests ways of _really_ solving problems
_without_ compromise, optimisation, negotiation or trade off.
Solutions from this are often so elegant that my guess is that any
engineer would be really turned on by them.
There's also an excellent piece of software, Invention Machine Lab,
that helps this process.  We're resellers in England (interest
declared! - see Web site below) or have a mooch round 
www.invention-machine.com for more detail.
Cheers,
Jonathan
J. Haigh, Next Step Associates, England (+44) 1 983 760 819
Innovation services for people, products, projects and processes
http://www.enterprise.net/amb/nextstsep
Return to Top
Subject: Re: Ignitioning Yourself
From: brindle@lf.hp.com (Mark Brindle)
Date: 12 Nov 1996 02:05:10 GMT
McInnis (mcinnis@austin.ibm.com) wrote:
: Actually, I've heard that you can electrocute yourself with 12 Volts,
: but it's real hard to accomplish.
Here's one way:  fill your boat about knee-deep with sea water,
then reach down into the bilge-pocket and touch the float-switch
for the bilge pump.  No sweat, it's only 12 vooooooooooooooolts!
...don't try this at home, kids, 
Mark
Return to Top

Downloaded by WWW Programs
Byron Palmer