![]() |
![]() |
Back |
"S. Yoder"Return to Topwrote: > "Draftsperson" doesn't cut it either. Makes me think of >an old Far Side cartoon ;) I recall visions of my youth when my dad farmed with draft horses. No, this has nothing to do with any technical discussion, either (grin) Dennis Shinn Seattle AutoCAD User Group SAUG-BBS [206] 644-7115 [PCGNet]9:517/215 Anatech Systems Construction Detailing 3D modeling support for the construction industry http://www.halcyon.com/jeeper email: jeeper@halcyon.com
Apologise for any cross posting. I'm a designer employed in an important electromechanical engineering company. To design we use CATIA v4.1.6 and I'm used to begin a new study working in the 3D space; I think that 2D space is just a particular case of 3D needed, for example, by the Engineering Department. I'm trying to make some of my colleagues join to this philosophy but it is very hard, they think that 3D is just something nice to see but unuseful at all in order to design. Which is your opinion about this topic? I think that working in the 3D is not only a different way of designing but it is also a real cultural change; may be this is the reason that only young people follow me. Davide Malacalza dmal@iol.itReturn to Top
Dear colleagues, I've been discussing for a long time with other people about the evaluation of the Research & Development area. As you know, R&D; can't be evaluated using the typical indexes usually used inside the firm (ROE, ROI, Income and so on) and I still haven't found a satisfactory answer to this question... if any answer exist, of course! Davide MalacalzaReturn to Top
I S S A C ' 9 6 International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation July 24-26, 1996 Zurich, Switzerland Sponsored by ACM SIGSAM and ACM SIGNUM http://www.inf.ethz.ch/ISSAC96/ISSAC96.html ___________________________________________________________________________ ISSAC'96 will be held in the main building of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Raemistr. 101, Zurich, Switzerland. The conference starts on Wednesday, July 24, and ends on Friday, July 26. To register for ISSAC'96 fill in the attached registration form and send it by e-mail, air mail or fax to the address mentioned there. PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL PROGRAM Tuesday, July 23: 9:00 - 12:00, 14:00 - 17:00: Tutorials (see below) 17:00 - 20:00: Registration 19:00: ISSAC Reception Wednesday, July 24: 8:15 - 8:30: Official Symposium Opening (Prof. Erwin Engeler) 8:30 - 10:00: POLYNOMIAL ALGORITHMS * Arithmetic and Factorization of Polynomials in F_2[x] J. von zur Gathen & J. Gerhard * Factoring Modular Polynomials} J. von zur Gathen & S. Hartlieb * Parallel Distinct Degree Factorization Algorithm T. Fujise & H. Murao * Computing Complexification of a Semialgebraic Set M.F. Roy & N. Vorobjov 10:45 - 12:15: ALGEBRAIC ALGORITHMS * Approximate Polynomial Greatest Common Divisors and Nearest Singular Polynomials N. Karmakar & Lakshman Y.N. * Euclidean Algorithm in Dimension n L. Pottier * Fast Computations in the Lattice of Polynomial Intermediate Fields of a Rational Function Field F. Binder * Testing Shift-Equivalence of Polynomials Using Quantum Machines D.Y. Grigoriev 13:30 - 14:30: INVITED LECTURE Title to be Announced Prof. Volker Weispfenning, Universitaet Passau, Germany 14:45 - 16:15: GROEBNER BASES * An Optimal Algorithm for Constructing the Reduced Groebner Basis of Binomial Ideals U. Koppenhagen & E. Mayr * Exponential Space Computation of Groebner Bases K. Kuehnle & E. Mayr * Multigraded Hilbert Functions and Buchberger Algorithm M. Caboara, G. De Dominicis & L. Robbiano * Groebner Bases under Composition II H. Hong 16:30 - 17:30: POSTER SESSION I AND SOFTWARE DEMOS Thursday, July 25: 8:30 - 10:00: SYSTEM ISSUES * Symbolic Mathematics System Evaluators R. Fateman * A Case Study of Multi-Threaded Groebner Basis Completion B. Amrhein, O. Gloor, & W. Kuechlin * MPP: A Framework for Distributed Polynomial Computations O. Bachmann, H. Schoenemann & S. Gray * Memory Tracing of Algebraic Calculations A. Norman & J. Fitch 10:45 - 12:15: SOLUTIONS OF EQUATIONS * Solution of Elementary Systems of Equations in a Box in R^n D. Richardson * Analysis of Zero Clusters in Multivariate Polynomial Systems H.J. Stetter * A Tangent-Secant Method for Polynomial Complex Root Calculation G. Collins & W. Krandick * Fast High-Precision Computations of Complex Square Roots T. Ahrendt 13:30 - 14:30: INVITED LECTURE Kronecker, Galois, and Symbolic Computation Prof. Harold M. Edwards, Courant Institute, New York University, USA 14:45 - 16:15: GROUPS AND ALGEBRAS * Computing Character Tables of p-Groups A. Thuemmel * New Sequential and Parallel Algorithms for Generating High Dimension Hecke Algebras using the Condensation Technique G. Cooperman & M. Tselman * Algorithms for Primitive Elements of Free Lie Algebras and Lie Superalgebras A.A. Mikhalev & A.A. Zolotykh * Efficient Decomposition of Associative Algebras W. Eberly & M. Giesbrecht 16:30 - 17:30: POSTER SESSION II AND SOFTWARE DEMOS 19:30: Banquet Friday, July 26: 8:30 - 10:00: DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS I * Janet Bases for Second Order Ordinary Differential Equations F. Schwarz * The General Solution of an Ordinary Differential Equation E. Hubert * Symbolic Computation of the Index of Quasilinear Differential-Algebraic Equations G. Thomas * MapleTensor: Progress Report on a New System for Performing Indicial and Component Tensor Calculations Using Symbolic Computation M. Kavian, R. McLenaghan & K.O. Geddes 10:45 - 12:15: DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS II * Differentially Homogeneous Differential Polynomials G. Reinhart & W. Sit * Rational Solutions of the Mixed Differential Equation and Its Application to Factorization of Differential Operators M. van Hoeij * An Algorithm for Complete Enumeration of All Factorizations of a Linear Ordinary Differential Operator S.P. Tsarev * D'Alembertian Solutions of Inhomogeneous Linear Equations S.A. Abramov & E.V. Zima 13:30 - 14:30: INVITED LECTURE Interfacing Computer Algebra and Numerical Modeling Prof. Stanly Steinberg, University of New Mexico, USA 14:30 - 16:10: LINEAR ALGEBRA * On Rank Properties of Toeplitz Matrices over Finite Fields E. Kaltofen & A. Lobo * Computing Popov and Hermite Forms of Polynomial Matrices G. Villard * Asymptotically Fast Computation of the Hermite Normal Forms of Integer Matrices A. Storjohann & G. Labahn * Near Optimal Algorithms for Computing Smith Normal Forms of Integer Matrices A. Storjohann * Generic Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalization by Exact Division U. Erlingsson, E. Kaltofen & D. Musser 16:40 - 18:00: APPLICATIONS * Automatic Generation of Optimization Code Based on Symbolic Non-Linear Domain Formulation R. Bacher * A Methodology of Parsing Mathematical Notation for Mathematical Computation Y. Zhao * Hypergeometric Function Representations K. Roach * Asymptotic Expansions of exp-log Functions D. Richardson, B. Salvy, J. Shackell & J. van der Hoeven TUTORIALS On Tuesday, July 23, seven tutorials will be given by leading experts. The tutorials are intended for students and researchers to broaden their knowledge base. The fee is 90 CHF for students and 120 CHF for others. It includes a morning and an afternoon session. Tutorial registration does not require conference registration. Morning sessions: - Introduction to Symbolic Summation: Peter Paule - Introduction to Solving Polynomial Systems: Teo Mora - Algebraic Methods for Proving Theorems in Elementary and Differential Geometries: Xiaoshan Gao Afternoon sessions: - Advanced Algorithms for Symbolic Summation: Peter Paule - Advanced Algorithms for Solving Polynomial Systems over Complex Numbers: Teo Mora - Advanced Algorithms for Solving Polynomial Systems over Real Numbers: Laureano Gonzales Vega - Algorithmic Methods for Rational Algebraic Curves: Rafael Sendra More information on the tutorials is available on the ISSAC'96 WWW page. For further questions please contact Hoon Hong (Hoon.Hong@risc.uni-linz.ac.at). @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@Return to Top
The 2nd IMACS Conference on Applications of Computer Algebra 17 - 20 July, 1996 Research Institute for Symbolic Computation Castle Hagenberg, Austria http://info.risc.uni-linz.ac.at:70/0/conference/IMACS96/imacs.html (with . . very . . many details inside) _________________________________________________________________________ The IMACS ACA conference series is dedicated to reporting serious applications of computer algebra theories and tools for mathematics, logic, science, engineering and education. The 2nd IMACS ACA conference will be held in a medieval castle near Linz, Austria. Sponsors U.S. Air Force European Office of Aerospace Reseach and Development Austrian Ministery for Economical Affairs Government of Upper Austria Macsyma Inc. MathSolutions Inc. General Chairs Bruno Buchberger (Austria), Stanly Steinberg (USA) Program Committee Chair Hoon Hong (Austria) Program Committee Akira Aiba (Japan) Erich Barke (Germany) Alexei Bocharov (USA) Victor Edneral Victor .G. Ganzha (Russia) (Germany) Vladimir P. Gerdt (Russia) Hoon Hong (Austria) Michael Johnson Richard Liska (Czech (Australia) Republic) Claudio Maccone Eugenio Roanes-Lozano (Italy) Rolf Mertig (Netherlands) (Spain) Shojiro Sakata (Japan) J. Rafael Sendra (Spain) Ralf Sommer (Germany) Sabine Stifter (Austria) Nikolay Vasiliev (Russia) E.V. Vorozhtsov (Russia) Dongming Wang (France) Michael Wester (USA) Scientific Program July 17th (Wednesday) 08:15-08:30 Conference Opening Morning Parallel Sessions 08:30-12:00 * Automated Theorem Proving I * Formal Analysis of PDEs Afternoon Parallel Sessions 14:00-17:30 * Automated Theorem Proving II * Coding Theory and Cryptology July 18th (Thursday) Morning Parallel Sessions * Geometric Modelling and CAD 08:30-12:00 * General Relativity and Quantum Physics (08:30-10:00) Numerical Problems of Mathematical Physics (10:30-12:00) Afternoon Parallel Sessions 14:00-17:30 * Computational Category Theory * Non-Standard Applications July 19th (Friday) Morning Parallel Sessions 08:30-12:00 * Polynomial Elimination I * Constraint Programming * Analog Circuit Design Afternoon Parallel Sessions 14:00-17:30 * Polynomial Elimination II * Evaluations of Series * Quantifier Elimination 19:30-22:30 Conference Banquet July 20th (Saturday) Morning Parallel Sessions 08:30-12:00 * New Appplications in Mathematica * Comparative CAS Reviews and Philosophy 12:00 -12:15 Conference Closing Current List of Attendees 1.Akira Aiba 2.Helmer Aslaksen 3.Stefania Audoly 4.Daniel Augot 5.Henk Barendregt 6.R. Barrere 7.Laurent Bernardin 8.Piergiorgio Bertoli 9.Alexei Bocharov 10.Carsten Borchers 11.François Boulier 12.Chris Brown 13.Ronald Brown 14.Bruno Buchberger 15.Richard Buckland 16.Hans-Joachim Bungartz 17.Jacques Calmet 18.Olga Caprotti 19.Giuseppa Carrà Ferro 20.Bernd, Ingo Dahn 21.Andreas Dolzmann 22.Winfried Dreckmann 23.Victor Edneral 24.Marc Gaëtano 25.Karin Gatermann 26.Robbie Gates 27.Wolfgang Gehrke 28.Vladimir P. Gerdt 29.Floyd Gerwig 30.Emma-Neila Gonzalez-Campos 31.Hans-Gert Gräbe 32.Laurent Granvilliers 33.Markus Grassl 34.Johannes Grotendorst 35.Guenther Gsaller 36.Jason Harris 37.Lars Hedrich 38.Karsten Homann 39.Hoon Hong 40.Claude Huchet 41.John McIver 42.Ying Jiangqian 43.Mats Jirstrand 44.Michael Johnson 45.Michael Joswig 46.Wolfram Koepf 47.J. Korelc 48.F. William Lawvere 49.Franck Leprevost 50.Carla Limongelli 51.R. Liska 52.Gerton Lunter 53.Claudio Maccone 54.W. Mathis 55.Rolf Mertig 56.J. Lyn Miller 57.Eric Monfroy 58.Antonio Montes 59.J.E. Morais 60.Marianne Morillon 61.Sally D. Morrison 62.Bernard Mourrain 63.Joern Mueller-Quade 64.Shigekazu Nakagawa 65.Masayuki Noro 66.Armin Nueckel 67.Jesus Palacian 68.Frank Postel 69.Pottmann Helmut 70.Stefan Ratschan 71.Mohamed Rayes 72.Gregory J. Reid 73.Christophe Ringeissen 74.Eugenio Roanes-Lozano 75.Bob Rosebrugh 76.Maria Pia Saccomani 77.J.F. San-Juan 78.Yosuke Sato 79.Sauer Tomas 80.David Saunders 81.K. Schaub 82.Klaus U. Schulz 83.Werner M. Seiler 84.J. Rafael Sendra 85.Roman Shtokhamer 86.M. Sofroniou 87.Volker Sorge 88.Andreas Stein 89.Stanly Steinberg 90.Hans J. Stetter 91.Jürgen Stuber 92.Thomas Sturm 93.Ross Taylor 94.Quoc-Nam 95.Michael Trott 96.Edwin Julio Vargas Sanchez 97.Nikolay Vasiliev 98.Sebastian Walcher 99.Robert Walters 100.Volker Weispfenning 101.Michael Wester 102.Franz Winkler 103.Lu Yang 104.Guo Yike 105.Paul Zimmermann @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@Return to Top
gerkelly@iol.ie wrote: : I am interested in finding information on the mathematical modelling : of activated sludge wastewater treatment plants and how much success : has been achieved in replicating real activated sludge plants. John Sheaffer's books on "Future Water" were excellent in my opinion. He refers to half a dozen or so projects in the U.S. which clarify sewage water enough that the ponds are suitable for recreational use. In the case of Muskegan, Michigan, the solids were turned into fertilizer and used to grow corn which made $ one million. The challenge of your modelling would be to show how sewage treatment can come in as an income generator rather than simply a drain (no pun intended) on city resources. FWP. -- *** To discuss cities and city-states for C. 21 email Ftr_Cities-request@websightz.com with subscribe in the body; http://www.websightz.com/ftr_cities ***Return to Top
stanb@sr.hp.com (Stan Bischof) writes: > : >P.S. I also tried connecting two fruits in series and while the voltage > : >increased significantly the bulb still did not light up..... > : Put them in series and you will get the same voltage, but more > : current will be available. Still not enough for an incandescent > : bulb, though. > Put them in SERIES and you get TWICE the voltage but the same current. > Put them in PARALLEL and you get the SAME voltage, but more current > will be available. > Basic gist is correct though, the source in question has very high > internal resistance. Which means, to the neophyte, that he's going to have to connect a considerable amount of fruit in parallel in order to light the incandescent bulb. Actually, he'll probably need to serially connect *banks* of paralleled fruit in order to get an adequate voltage as well. -- Bill Swan An Comunn Gaidhlig Seattle bill@cygnus.wa.com The Seattle Gaelic SocietyReturn to Top
TangSimon@cuhk.edu.hk (_SAC_commando_) wrote: > I S S A C ' 9 6 > International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation > July 24-26, 1996 Zurich, Switzerland > Sponsored by ACM SIGSAM and ACM SIGNUM > http://www.inf.ethz.ch/ISSAC96/ISSAC96.html > May I ask the reason for posting an announcement about a conference that took place 3 months ago? 'You can lead a horse's ass to knowledge, but you can't make him think.'Return to Top
Carolyn DoughertyReturn to Topwrote... >After reading a few of these "drafter" posts, and thinking >about how these men must think about and thus treat the women >they work with...is it any wonder that only 6% of us are women? First of all, the way this statement reads, it's like you're saying that many more women would be engineers if it weren't for the way they were treated in the workplace. As if. You and I both know that what you're describing above isn't the problem -- just a symptom. Second of all, if the goal were to see more women becoming engineers and contributing to the profession (a noble and reasonable goal), you ought not to be worried so much about what *men* in these newsgroups are saying as what *women* are saying. One of the chief proponents of the status quo in the "drafter" discussion was a woman. (Or at least posted under a woman's name. Now that I think about it, how can I know that you are a woman, or you that I am a man?) Women cannot reasonably expect to make revolutionary changes to the engineering profession without presenting a united front as pertains to those changes -- unless the changes are forced through legal action. The way corporations view sexual harassment is IMPO an example of forced change, and as such is sometimes not held in high regard by non-supervisory staff, just as in the cases of TQM and workplace diversity. The united front, however, is slow in coming. I have a friend working as a statistician for a biomedical research outfit. She's got a Master's and is a quick study. She and I often argue about workplace terminology. She used the common expression "man-hours" in one of our talks, and I told her that I was trying to find a new term, something more inclusive, more generic. She was all over me like white on rice: don't I have more important things to think about? Well, yes I do. But not many more important things, and none of them much more important. This is because I believe that (a) our productivity as engineers is more closely tied to our self-esteem than to our salary; and (b) that the expressions we use are closely tied to our self-image, and to what extent we value others. She didn't get it. And I feel that if women don't get it, men can't be expected to. I think that any job description that ends in "man" can be changed to some alternative without changing the essential meaning of the term. "Drafter" instead of "draftsman." (Or "designer" for those with more experience, as was suggested elsewhere in the thread.) But "man-hours" is tough to change, kind of like "freshman." It's in wide use, and "staff hours" and "level of effort" are not as easy to say. I'm open to suggestions on that one. The wider point is, though, that inclusive workplace language is an ethical issue, and should be treated as such by our profession. Dr. Ron Graham Project Engineer for Robotics, GreyPilgrim LLC, Washington DC founder of sci.engr and keeper of the sci.engr.* FAQs EMMA Robotic Manipulator online -- http://www.greypilgrim.com/